Bass Player: Pedals?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- behndy
- Supporter

- Posts: 19883
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Cali. East Bay Yo.
- Contact:
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
yesh. gates are GOOD. selectable even more so.
but they have to be well done. some builders do great ones, some don't.
but they have to be well done. some builders do great ones, some don't.
Eric! wrote:YOU'RE like having two pedals in one
with your...momentary fuck switch and all..
music, videos, in progress - http://www.youtube.com/c/behndytheactionindex wrote:QUADRACOCK BEHNDERFUCK
okay, Plan B - PANIC

- D.o.S.
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
- Location: Ewe-Kay
- DarkAxel
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 8726
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:38 pm
- Location: BWARRRRM
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
When i hear fuzzed/distorted bass, i like when there's the original attack and character.
but sometimes i like less transparent sounds as well
best sounds..
APC - The Package (might be just well mixed with guitars so i'm not sure... )
QOTSA - Mexicola, You Can't Quit Me Babe
Failure - Heliotropic
Karnivool - Simple Boy (!!!!!!!!)
NIN - Only etc
when i've been recording, i've had some AWESOME results with Woolly Mammoth and MadebyMike Green Muff with midboost. That muff was really awesome. So i'd say make a Muff either with flat mids or a mids knob, they're really awesome for bass... gating can be cool - woolly mammoth was cool as well but more like the "extra sound for a few moments"
but sometimes i like less transparent sounds as well

best sounds..
APC - The Package (might be just well mixed with guitars so i'm not sure... )
QOTSA - Mexicola, You Can't Quit Me Babe
Failure - Heliotropic
Karnivool - Simple Boy (!!!!!!!!)
NIN - Only etc
when i've been recording, i've had some AWESOME results with Woolly Mammoth and MadebyMike Green Muff with midboost. That muff was really awesome. So i'd say make a Muff either with flat mids or a mids knob, they're really awesome for bass... gating can be cool - woolly mammoth was cool as well but more like the "extra sound for a few moments"
Last edited by DarkAxel on Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
I make pedal demos as East Stomp Boutique - http://www.youtube.com/c/eaststompboutique
great deals: Jwar Kayzer Bellyheart wfs1234 bronzetalon Ech0 Scruffie MaxMaps solarolosonoio Schlatte WeHuntKings Monkeydancer Eric! Univalve Huggernaut fuzzmax amorphous Tristan Goroth dan_abnormal Obulus Jrmy BitchPudding beezlebub ianmarks darkfield Abanoise Jskadiang Disarm D'Arcy Snufkino Gerb somethingclever fidget
great deals: Jwar Kayzer Bellyheart wfs1234 bronzetalon Ech0 Scruffie MaxMaps solarolosonoio Schlatte WeHuntKings Monkeydancer Eric! Univalve Huggernaut fuzzmax amorphous Tristan Goroth dan_abnormal Obulus Jrmy BitchPudding beezlebub ianmarks darkfield Abanoise Jskadiang Disarm D'Arcy Snufkino Gerb somethingclever fidget
- Bassus Sanguinis
- Supporter

- Posts: 5075
- Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 7:32 am
- Location: Espoo, Finland
- Contact:
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
bigchiefbc wrote:I may be in the minority of bass players, but personally if you need a clean blend for it to retain low end (or mids/attack for that matter), I'm not interested. I hate the sound of clean blended fuzz, and any time a pedal offers it, I turn it all the way off. As I've said before, it's like playing a game of "just the tip", or trying to be half-pregnant, if you prefer that analogy. If I click on a fuzz, I want fuzz, not fuzz+clank.
...yeah, THIS, I share the sentiment with bigcheaf. First of all, if it's needed for low end, the fuzz is probably weak.
Second, usually the clank with fuzz just doesn't sound good at all. You have to turned the bass tone controls down tp eliminate unwanted clean clank in the first place for it to work. Which doesn't improve the bass aggression a bit. And then ALL is fucked.
I've wondered WHY the bass pedals just can't have a clean blend with a tone controll (low pass filter) dedicated to that clean channel, so it cut's all but the low end if that's what the clean blend is supposed to ensure in there.
However I USE at the moment a Mini Gnomeratron with clean-ish blend and enjoy it. BUT there's always another fuzz or spanking dirt or sub boost /octaver in front of or after that. THAT rocks.


:::: Metal up Yöur Jazz! with FUZZIFERblack psychedelic doom ::::
Ugly Nora wrote:It's a sad day when Bassus Sanguinis becomes the voice of reason.
- moose23
- experienced

- Posts: 648
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:58 am
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
There's always room for a really good bass overdrive.
I think for cleanish blend on a fuzz a diode lift on the first clipping section of a muff is really nice ala a jumbo tonebender or B&M fuzz unit. Fuzz I sell is a cross between a Fuzz Unit and a Russian Muff.
I think for cleanish blend on a fuzz a diode lift on the first clipping section of a muff is really nice ala a jumbo tonebender or B&M fuzz unit. Fuzz I sell is a cross between a Fuzz Unit and a Russian Muff.
- Jwar
- Cosmic of BILF

- Posts: 18239
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: The edge of existence
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
Just clone the Depth Charge. It's seriously the best sounding bass fuzz I've heard. It actually has good musical tone and not just a bunch of fucking static. Don't get me wrong, I like static too but it must be usable static. Some pedals just sound like poo to me. Over hyped poo. A pedal that is blended correctly is a HUGE plus.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".
-JWAR
-JWAR
- jrmy
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 10645
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:09 am
- Contact:
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
For the love of all that's holy, no more Muff variants. Don't get me wrong - Muffs are great, and there are billions of flavors to be had, but that's the problem. There are billions of builders doing their version of a Muff. Whatever you do, either try for something unique, or base it off a less-well-trodden fuzz of yore. There are plenty of awesome non-Muff circuits that could use some greater mutation / distribution / availability.
I'm more like a mids-ist than a bassist.
"The main rule on ILF is don't be an asshole." - Tom Dalton
I can't wait to annoy the shit out of you with my mountain of mids. - bigchiefbc
https://thewirechimes.bandcamp.com/releases
http://crotchthrottle.bandcamp.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jrmyfuzz/
"The main rule on ILF is don't be an asshole." - Tom Dalton
I can't wait to annoy the shit out of you with my mountain of mids. - bigchiefbc
https://thewirechimes.bandcamp.com/releases
http://crotchthrottle.bandcamp.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jrmyfuzz/
- bigchiefbc
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 7313
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
Bassus Sanguinis wrote:bigchiefbc wrote:I may be in the minority of bass players, but personally if you need a clean blend for it to retain low end (or mids/attack for that matter), I'm not interested. I hate the sound of clean blended fuzz, and any time a pedal offers it, I turn it all the way off. As I've said before, it's like playing a game of "just the tip", or trying to be half-pregnant, if you prefer that analogy. If I click on a fuzz, I want fuzz, not fuzz+clank.
...yeah, THIS, I share the sentiment with bigcheaf. First of all, if it's needed for low end, the fuzz is probably weak.
Second, usually the clank with fuzz just doesn't sound good at all. You have to turned the bass tone controls down tp eliminate unwanted clean clank in the first place for it to work. Which doesn't improve the bass aggression a bit. And then ALL is fucked.
I've wondered WHY the bass pedals just can't have a clean blend with a tone controll (low pass filter) dedicated to that clean channel, so it cut's all but the low end if that's what the clean blend is supposed to ensure in there.
However I USE at the moment a Mini Gnomeratron with clean-ish blend and enjoy it. BUT there's always another fuzz or spanking dirt or sub boost /octaver in front of or after that. THAT rocks.
Honestly, I probably wouldn't have a problem with a clean blend if it had a good LPF on it, and if it wasn't truly clean, like make it overdriven/slightly dirty or something. Who knows, I'd give it a shot, anyways.
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:srsly?last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
Fuck you.
- Mudfuzz
- HERO

- Posts: 16705
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
- Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
bigchiefbc wrote:Bassus Sanguinis wrote:bigchiefbc wrote:I may be in the minority of bass players, but personally if you need a clean blend for it to retain low end (or mids/attack for that matter), I'm not interested. I hate the sound of clean blended fuzz, and any time a pedal offers it, I turn it all the way off. As I've said before, it's like playing a game of "just the tip", or trying to be half-pregnant, if you prefer that analogy. If I click on a fuzz, I want fuzz, not fuzz+clank.
...yeah, THIS, I share the sentiment with bigcheaf. First of all, if it's needed for low end, the fuzz is probably weak.
Second, usually the clank with fuzz just doesn't sound good at all. You have to turned the bass tone controls down tp eliminate unwanted clean clank in the first place for it to work. Which doesn't improve the bass aggression a bit. And then ALL is fucked.
I've wondered WHY the bass pedals just can't have a clean blend with a tone controll (low pass filter) dedicated to that clean channel, so it cut's all but the low end if that's what the clean blend is supposed to ensure in there.
However I USE at the moment a Mini Gnomeratron with clean-ish blend and enjoy it. BUT there's always another fuzz or spanking dirt or sub boost /octaver in front of or after that. THAT rocks.
Honestly, I probably wouldn't have a problem with a clean blend if it had a good LPF on it, and if it wasn't truly clean, like make it overdriven/slightly dirty or something. Who knows, I'd give it a shot, anyways.
I actually so agree. I think the whole idea of a "effect" that "distorts" you sound needs purity... fuck lets have a "fuzz" that is a 3-way mixer where you have fuzz, octave fuzz and dry all running parallel and with a POWERful filter which has a freq and a amount control for each channel
- skullservant
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 16575
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
I used to swear by a DOD Death Metal with the bass and mids all the way up, highs on one, followed by a Meatbox. It's definitely not subtle, but it sounds great
- Derelict78
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4844
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 6:57 am
- Location: Cadillac, MI
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
Bassus Sanguinis wrote:Second, usually the clank with fuzz just doesn't sound good at all. You have to turned the bass tone controls down tp eliminate unwanted clean clank in the first place for it to work. Which doesn't improve the bass aggression a bit. And then ALL is fucked.
I've wondered WHY the bass pedals just can't have a clean blend with a tone controll (low pass filter) dedicated to that clean channel, so it cut's all but the low end if that's what the clean blend is supposed to ensure in there.
This is exactly why I wired my bass stereo. I can run fuzz through the bridge pickup and roll the tone down on my neck pickup. if you do put in a clean blend I second or third the clean blend tone knob
aen wrote:Or I'll just use fuzz. Then Ill sound cool regardless.
Achtane wrote:Well, volcanoes are pretty fuckin' cool. Like I guess lava flows are doomy. Slow and still able to to melt your eardrums.
-
Officer Bukowski
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
Maybe we should just listen to some DFA1979 and call it a day?
I make pedals. SHARK TANK
- skullservant
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 16575
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
sounds like a plannnn
- Fuzz_Pi
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2010 11:28 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
Personally I love clean blends, but thats probably because I run a tube amp very dirty as my "clean tone"
But +1 on the suggestions for a clean blend with a low pass filter and gain.
I think you should make a duel channel bass dirt box, have the "clean blend" channel
be separately foot-switchable from the fuzz
But +1 on the suggestions for a clean blend with a low pass filter and gain.
I think you should make a duel channel bass dirt box, have the "clean blend" channel
be separately foot-switchable from the fuzz
- wdinc01
- experienced

- Posts: 586
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:24 am
- Location: Duval FL
Re: Bass Player: Pedals?
jrmy wrote:For the love of all that's holy, no more Muff variants. Don't get me wrong - Muffs are great, and there are billions of flavors to be had, but that's the problem. There are billions of builders doing their version of a Muff. Whatever you do, either try for something unique, or base it off a less-well-trodden fuzz of yore. There are plenty of awesome non-Muff circuits that could use some greater mutation / distribution / availability.
I'd really like someone to make a Buzzaround built for bass. I know EQD makes the Sound Shank, which isn't easily available, and every other "boutique" guitar effects company "makes" one as well, but I'd like to see someone tweak and add/subtract to the circuit to make it a bass fuzz, like Robot Factor/BassFuzz.com did with the Tentacle Love Superfuzz. I think it would be awesome.
Achtane wrote:ILF: Instead of reducing the dimensions of the board, just fill it up with pedals until it looks right.
