Dowi wrote:I agree with most of the things said in the last page, but you are all missing a point: THE LOOKS.
With all the respect for the designer and for the apparently incredible sounding circuit, It has one of the worst artworks I have ever seen.
It looks like the sheet music workbooks for kids I had when I was 7 or 8 years old.
Seriously nobody else dislikes it?
You come from one of the best looking pedals in history and then you do.. This.
I think it's a bit too much for me to spend, though it sounds cool.
But I think the sheet music workbook aesthetic is really endearing
As someone who owns a Moog MF104M-SD and a DOD Rubberneck, I'd say if you're looking to spend $350 on a delay pedal without tap tempo go for this:
Otherwise just get a Rubberneck, but be sure to grab an external footswitch for it because I wrecked the first one I owned by constantly using the built in (probably PCB mounted) footswitches for my Rubberneckin' and self-oscillatin' needs.
Chankgeez wrote:
We should have a game show à la Name That Tune
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl:
Chankgeez wrote:
We should have a game show à la Name That Tune
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl:
