garnet session man reverb tank

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
maninashed
involved
involved
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:43 pm
Location: Toronto-ish

garnet session man reverb tank

Post by maninashed »

does anybody know what size or whatever of a reverb tank a garnet session man has? I'm pretty outta my element with replacing this
User avatar
BetterOffShred
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: garnet session man reverb tank

Post by BetterOffShred »

Just out of curiosity, what leads you to believe the tank itself is bad and not p3rhaps the reverb tranny or the associated tube?
User avatar
fuzzisokiguess
committed
committed
Posts: 281
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:56 am
Location: Being

Re: garnet session man reverb tank

Post by fuzzisokiguess »

http://www.garnetamps.com/smreverb.htm

Sure you’ve found this, but looks like a 2-spring Hammond.

Also this:
https://www.amplifiedparts.com/tech-cor ... d-compared

Lots of variables (resistance, decay) but really id just make sure that a replacement will fit, after that, as betteroffshred noted, whether it works, and whether you like the sound is something else entirely :animal: (edited for beer-related grammar fails)
User avatar
maninashed
involved
involved
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2017 6:43 pm
Location: Toronto-ish

Re: garnet session man reverb tank

Post by maninashed »

well the one I bought doesn't have one hah

so as long as it'll fit in the amp I can use it? I want something more fender-y sounding
User avatar
BetterOffShred
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: garnet session man reverb tank

Post by BetterOffShred »

So you bought the amp, and someone had removed the reverb tank itself? Does it have wiring going to where the tank used to be? Does it have a 12au7 tube or similar in the reverb tube socket? There are a lot of components that operate this system including the transformer, is that still present? Without knowing why the reverb tank has been deleted from the circuit, the number of questions about what's nonfunctional and or missing are numerous. Sure you could buy a tank and stuff it in there, maybe it'll work maybe not. Since there are also numerous impedance ranges and sizes/coils etc it's also a gamble.

Not to send you elsewhere, but I'd go over to Hoffman amps forums and start a thread. There will most likely be someone there who knows all about this model.

Also there is a legitimate danger of B+ voltage around the reverb components, so I would advise caution with any tinkering you do in the amp.
User avatar
crochambeau
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2218
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: garnet session man reverb tank

Post by crochambeau »

There should be RCA cables or jacks feeding the reverb tank.

I peeked at a Session Man schematic and it appears your feed to the reverb tank is a transformer coupled 12AU7, and the xfrmr calls for 8 ohms on the secondary...

SO, you want an 8 ohm input on the tank. You can probably get away with anything in the less than 100 ohms range, but 8 ohm tanks are common.

The secondary of the tank is directly feeding a tube, so you'll want something north of 2K, also common.

I'm a fan of AES with stuff like this, they have a decent range of products and a fairly well thought out synopsis of all the players (mind you, I cannot personally vouch for their findings, as I have not done AB testing across the ranges myself; I have, however, been happy with their services in the past):

https://www.tubesandmore.com/products/reverb_tanks

And a comparison to start your journey:

https://www.tubesandmore.com/tech-corne ... d-compared

Beyond that, as stated above, it is a matter of physical fit and being sure your supporting circuitry is up to the task.
Post Reply