Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
Dungus
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 5:30 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by Dungus »

popvulture wrote:Hark the fuckin' herald angels sing. I wish they'd all just leave that shit to Strymon.

EDIT: didn't they say there were going to be two versions though? I remember something about one at around $199, then a "crazier" one at around $300. I would hope at least the weirder one has reverse. We shall see.
I think the cheaper one is just the same as the more expensive one but with one reverb engine thingy instead of two. Can't imagine they'll have different sounds.
Image

I cordially invite you to fuck right off and let the rest of us talk about music like adults.- dubkitty
User avatar
Dungus
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 5:30 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by Dungus »

popvulture wrote:
Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.
Where are you getting deets on this, Dungus? Just curious, wanna know more about the Source thing. Aren't there going to be two versions? Surprised at lack of reverse. :idk:
Found it - http://files.effectsdatabase.com/brands ... is_001.jpg
Image

I cordially invite you to fuck right off and let the rest of us talk about music like adults.- dubkitty
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by popvulture »

D.o.S. wrote:"crazy" reverse reverb :lol:
Haha was more referring to more crazy sounds in general, dickus :lol:

Well, I'm nonetheless psyched to hear how this thing sounds, though I don't think I'll be buying any more complicated verb boxes for a long time.

Now that I think about it, it might be sorta admirable that they said fuck it re: reverse. Aside from shimmer, that's one of the hardest effects to make sound remotely original.
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by tremolo3 »

Dungus wrote: Saw a full frontal pic of it somewhere... probably here! I'll have a look for it. Yeah, it didn't have a reverse function on the scroll wheel thingy, so im assuming it doesn't feature. LOADS of shimmer no doubt, though. :facepalm:
I think you have access to another 12 additional algorithms that you can load with their app, or something like that... Not very familiar nor interested on their stuff but I think that's how their delay works.
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by D.o.S. »

popvulture wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:"crazy" reverse reverb :lol:
Haha was more referring to more crazy sounds in general, dickus :lol:

Well, I'm nonetheless psyched to hear how this thing sounds, though I don't think I'll be buying any more complicated verb boxes for a long time.

Now that I think about it, it might be sorta admirable that they said fuck it re: reverse. Aside from shimmer, that's one of the hardest effects to make sound remotely original.
You can pretty easily make it sound lanigiro yletomer, though.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
Willem
committed
committed
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 4:28 pm
Location: France

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by Willem »

Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.

Are you sure it wouldn't as hidden algorithm with the neuro app?
Fuzzonaut about the RM-1N:
"Amp in a box"?
No, there's no amp in there - tone fairies and feedback goblins live inside this box.
User avatar
Dungus
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1189
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 5:30 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by Dungus »

Willem wrote:
Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.

Are you sure it wouldn't as hidden algorithm with the neuro app?
Image
Image

I cordially invite you to fuck right off and let the rest of us talk about music like adults.- dubkitty
User avatar
UglyCasanova
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 12556
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:47 am
Location: Norway

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by UglyCasanova »

Yeah, the Source verb will have an additional 12 algorithms available through the app.
The Ventris is a powerful stereo reverb pedal featuring 24 distinct effect engines
I've swapped most of the panel presets on my Nemesis for other algorithms. I mean, why would I ever need slapback? :lol:
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by tremolo3 »

UglyCasanova wrote:I mean, why would I ever need slapback? :lol:
Because of Dead Kennedys? :snax:
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
UglyCasanova
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 12556
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:47 am
Location: Norway

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by UglyCasanova »

Yeah...no. :erm:
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by tremolo3 »

mmmmkay
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by D.o.S. »

UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
Faldoe

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by Faldoe »

What's wrong with slapback?

To the OP - if you already have an Rv7 that's probably as good as your get without spending more or a bigger enclosure- like the Cathedral. I found most of the reverbs in it weren't that great but the reverse had a lot of options to tailor the sound.
User avatar
UglyCasanova
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 12556
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:47 am
Location: Norway

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by UglyCasanova »

D.o.S. wrote:
UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:
I like DK, I just don't play that sort of stuff myself. :idk:

The digital delay on short time+repeats and the tone rolled back sounds EXACTLY like the slapback algo. There was absolutely no reason to have a dedicated slot for it on the face of the pedal. That was my point.
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Post by tremolo3 »

UglyCasanova wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:
UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:
I like DK, I just don't play that sort of stuff myself. :idk:

The digital delay on short time+repeats and the tone rolled back sounds EXACTLY like the slapback algo. There was absolutely no reason to have a dedicated slot for it on the face of the pedal. That was my point.
Wait, is there a "slapback" algo? WTF HAHAHA
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
Post Reply