Keeley Loomer

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
echorec
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4929
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:31 am

Keeley Loomer

Post by echorec »

Hmm...this sounds like a famous band...I just can't seem to place it. :animal:

*edit: product page

https://robertkeeley.com/products/loomer

Image

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atYtnZ65ko4[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1I8YutV0gP8[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yx6aUDvzKUE[/youtube]
Last edited by echorec on Thu Oct 13, 2016 11:37 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by Chankgeez »

:|:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by popvulture »

That is so insanely lame.
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by popvulture »

Sorry if that sounded dickish--I just don't get this band-in-a-box thing they keep trying to do. I feel like all the fun is in figuring out how someone gets a sound, not having it conveniently canned in one device :idk:
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
User avatar
PeteeBee
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2324
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by PeteeBee »

Just to agree with Pop, seems like this would be of really limited use. Sounds nice though.
Iommic Pope wrote:This is the best you've been.
Suffering suits you.
BitchPudding wrote:Let this be written in our history as proof that ILoveFuzz is one tight knit internet family.
User avatar
Iommic Pope
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11400
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: Frimmin' on the Fram

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by Iommic Pope »

Or, you know, find your own shit to sound like.
WWPD?
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote: I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
User avatar
Confuzzled
experienced
experienced
Posts: 879
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 12:44 pm

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by Confuzzled »

meh, but I am curious to see the enclosure and it's size.
User avatar
echorec
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4929
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:31 am

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by echorec »

I have no personal interest in buying a Jaguar and doing my best Kevin Shields impersonation. I manipulate loops and use desktop synths, and I think there will be interesting textures inside for what I do, which is not shoegaze.

---Also, no need to apologize to me for being dickish. I didn't build it, I just shared it. I fully expected the backlash on this (you guys are fairly predictable like that). If a day ever comes, when this board stops being so predictable with its opinions and its allegiances, then I'll probably have to seriously question if I've crossed into an alternate dimension. Carry on, everyone. :hello:
User avatar
echorec
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4929
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:31 am

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by echorec »

popvulture wrote:Sorry if that sounded dickish--I just don't get this band-in-a-box thing they keep trying to do. I feel like all the fun is in figuring out how someone gets a sound, not having it conveniently canned in one device :idk:
But if you take a band-in-a-box pedal and then add other supplements to it, won't you be in different territory? If you buy one of these tribute boxes (blue) and then add red or green or yellow to it, then you're not going to have blue anymore.

Just like the Monterey and that Gilmour-style pedal, I would never buy them to mimic those players, but I think I could get some interesting complimentary sounds out of them by combining them with stuff I already have.
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by Inconuucl »

I'm still waiting for a version of Caverns with reverse reverb like he originally planned, perhaps call it Abyss. :snax:
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by tremolo3 »

Man I hate cover bands, but this... oh well.
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
coupleonapkins
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2882
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by coupleonapkins »

But how long until it shows up on Kevin Shields' board :D ?

Also, $299 :lol:

Image
Good morning!
User avatar
jrmy
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10645
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by jrmy »

Not gonna lie, I'd give it a shot, though $299 is a little steep for me. And as always, I'd be playing it on bass, so perhaps that would put it outside the original intent? But reverse + fuzz is totally something I'm into, no matter who it's meant to emulate.
I'm more like a mids-ist than a bassist.
"The main rule on ILF is don't be an asshole." - Tom Dalton
I can't wait to annoy the shit out of you with my mountain of mids. - bigchiefbc
https://thewirechimes.bandcamp.com/releases
http://crotchthrottle.bandcamp.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jrmyfuzz/
User avatar
PeteeBee
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2324
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by PeteeBee »

Upon seeing the layout, multiple footswitches, and effects loop, I can see this being really useful. Like this, an overdrive and another delay could probably be my pedalboard for most stuff. I'm not going to pick one up because I have stuff I dig, but if I were new to pedals or less currently happy with my gear then this would be more tempting. 299 isn't terrible if you figure a full fuzz and a full reverb are tucked in there.
Iommic Pope wrote:This is the best you've been.
Suffering suits you.
BitchPudding wrote:Let this be written in our history as proof that ILoveFuzz is one tight knit internet family.
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Keeley Loomer

Post by popvulture »

Yeah I figured I wouldn't hurt your feelings or anything, didn't think you were posting it out of extreme excitement. Just caught myself being the guy who posts his unconstructive, THAT SUCKS gut reaction and regretted it :D
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
Post Reply