Stereo Reverbs?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
backwardsvoyager
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4216
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am

Stereo Reverbs?

Post by backwardsvoyager »

What are your favourite reverb units that are true stereo in/out?

I'm noticing a lot of cool reverbs coming out nowadays but they're nearly all mono, which is a little disappointing. And my favourite verb (RV3) is only mono in.
I would mainly be running a vector synthesizer into it to get super infinite filtered sounds with massive stereo spread and textural movement. My synths have verb but it's way more fun having a versatile, dedicated unit that doesn't need menu diving to perform with. And deep reverb is great for turning a really overt, distinctive sound into something more subdued and atmospheric.
Rack, desktop units, pedals, anything is cool. Something like an Eventide Space seems appealing but i wonder whether people find that TOO versatile or not intuitive to tweak? Old rack units appeal to me too but sometimes you can't modify presets deeply or tweak on the fly.

stuff i've tried and not liked:
hardwire rv-7
line 6 m series verbs
boss rv-5
tc toneprint pedals
ehx cathedral
User avatar
blakestree
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2305
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Savannah, GA USA

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by blakestree »

Neunaber
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.

Blake's Tree
The_Active_Conundrum
experienced
experienced
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:16 am
Location: Norse Carolina
Contact:

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by The_Active_Conundrum »

Sorry you didn't go for that TC toneprint. Its a good cheapish solution for stereo. I'm Almost considring that Vindictive Vibe....just because stereo Univibe clone.

I know it isn't what you're asking, but what about two mono reverbs? can get some interestng sounds while trying to dial them in together. Forgive me if I'm thinking too much in a drone direction.
Great dealings with: ryan summit, UncleGrandfather, Pizza, hbombgraphics, dangergirlstarship, Clockworker, kosta
User avatar
MEC
HERO
HERO
Posts: 4651
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:04 pm
Location: Old North State

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by MEC »

blakestree wrote:Neunaber
Image
http://youthministry.bandcamp.com/
http://remainstheband.bandcamp.com/
Achtane wrote:FUZZ ALL DAY MAN FUZZ IS GOD ALL OTHER EFFECTS ARE SHIT
Caesar wrote:Dude, can you get the fuck out of my b/s/t thread with your bullshit.
PumpkinPieces wrote: This isn't America, this is I Love Fuzz.
Mudfuzz wrote:Remember when we were all just a bunch of weirdos that liked fucked up shit and not just a bunch of nerds buying bling to impress each other online?
User avatar
backwardsvoyager
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4216
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by backwardsvoyager »

blakestree wrote:Neunaber
that had totally been off my radar, but seems really cool, the Slate is intriguing. do you know if they're well suited to line level signals? the reason i was thinking eventide first is largely the switchable input/output impedance.
The_Active_Conundrum wrote:Sorry you didn't go for that TC toneprint. Its a good cheapish solution for stereo. I'm Almost considring that Vindictive Vibe....just because stereo Univibe clone.

I know it isn't what you're asking, but what about two mono reverbs? can get some interestng sounds while trying to dial them in together. Forgive me if I'm thinking too much in a drone direction.
that's a cool suggestion that i hadn't really considered. my only concern there is possibly throwing off the L-R balance as far as level and tone goes, could possibly sound weird? I will investigate for sure when i acquire a second RV-3.
as far as TC is concerned they're a great solution but i just can't jive with the sound of their pedals, something about them doesn't sit right with me.
User avatar
kbit
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11509
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:16 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by kbit »

I had a Space and thought it was a bit much. Since there's like eleven knobs per algorithm there are some controls that controlled very specific aspects of the sound which can be sweet for dialing it in just right but I didn't really enjoy it for tweaking on the fly. I do miss Trem verb though, that shit sounded awesome.
D.o.S. wrote:I'm fucking stupid and no one should operate under any other premise.
User avatar
Gigahearts_FX
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1000
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Manchester, UK
Contact:

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by Gigahearts_FX »

Don't think I'd consider anything since the big sky. It's amazing, truly
www.gigaheartsfx.com - new series of dirt boxes, launched mid September 2025
https://www.youtube.com/@Gigahearts-fx
Instagram - @gigahearts_fx
frigid midget
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:31 pm

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by frigid midget »

I doubt I'll be able to come with a good suggestions if you weren't impressed by any of those pedals you already tried...

But as far as non-conventional reverb goes, in case 'real' reverb is just too boring for you or something: Afterneath.

Also, I think the Red Panda Context could fall inbetween the somewhat predictable units you mensioned, and the big pricey overly complicated ones, which are guaranteed to give you a zillion of options you won't ever use.
Last edited by frigid midget on Sat Jan 31, 2015 9:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
backwardsvoyager
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4216
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by backwardsvoyager »

Gigahearts_FX wrote:Don't think I'd consider anything since the big sky. It's amazing, truly
yeah although its super expensive, that demo they did with the synths was hella impressive. even the weird choral verb sounded awesome. maybe i should save for that.
frigid midget wrote:I doubt I'llbe able to come with a good suggestions if you weren't impressed by any of those pedals you already tried...

But as far as non-conventional reverb goes, in case 'real' reverb is just too boring for you or something: Afterneath.

Also, I think the Red Panda Context could fall inbetween the somewhat predictable units you mensioned, and the big pricey overly complicated ones, which are guaranteed to give you a zillion of options you won't ever use.
I'm interested in those tonally but aren't they both mono in/out?
frigid midget
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:31 pm

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by frigid midget »

Damn, yeah they are, my bad.
User avatar
whiskey_face
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:00 am

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by whiskey_face »

I think the supernatural is stereo ins and outs
Image
good deals with Noise. . .guitmatt, magiclawnchair, delaydecay, Fuzz_Pi, nixhex113, theAntihero, Ancient Astronaught, bigchiefbc, jwojtysiak, neonblack, osbornkt

http://www.facebook.com/daughtersofzionaz
User avatar
doommeow
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2021
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:37 pm

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by doommeow »

If you're a) open to desktop units and b) can find one to try/buy, KYEO for an Alesis Ineko.

9 Reverbs included space and reverse, 7 delays, and 32 other modulations, pitchshifts, and other fun noise tools. Idiot simple interface - program is map out on a grid, one button each to change column and row, three pots to control parameters. True stereo. A sleeper hidden gem for processing other sounds, in a feedback loop, in the loop of a delay etc.

Image
User avatar
kbit
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11509
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:16 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by kbit »

whiskey_face wrote:I think the supernatural is stereo ins and outs
yeah, I've heard this is way better than the rv7 and its super lush.
D.o.S. wrote:I'm fucking stupid and no one should operate under any other premise.
User avatar
blakestree
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2305
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Savannah, GA USA

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by blakestree »

backwardsvoyager wrote:
blakestree wrote:Neunaber
that had totally been off my radar, but seems really cool, the Slate is intriguing. do you know if they're well suited to line level signals? the reason i was thinking eventide first is largely the switchable input/output impedance.
This is from their FAQ:
"The Wet Reverb has been designed to work well with voiced instruments, and in particular, stringed instruments. This includes guitar, bass guitar, pedal steel guitar, violin, keyboards, organ, etc. It does not work well with percussion instruments."

Beyond that, I dunno. I don't have one, but the Wet is my favorite sounding stereo reverb.
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.

Blake's Tree
User avatar
backwardsvoyager
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4216
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am

Re: Stereo Reverbs?

Post by backwardsvoyager »

WET sounds super nice in demos. only drawback is only having 3 knobs to play with at a time. i like that the programming control extends to the stereo width and modulation, so that's a serious contender.

supernatural seems neat but it seems like 2/3 of the modes are really overtly/cheesily modulated, but if the others were nice it'd probably still be worthwhile.

i watched some space demos and it seems to respond really weirdly to knob tweaking when something is playing through it, so strymon probably wins out on the big box front. i found the timeline surprisingly intuitive and ended up tweaking it on the fly a ton, so a bigsky would probably sit pretty well in my workflow. just dat $$$, it would be more expensive than the synths i'm using :lol:

that alesis box looks insanely cool, i would buy that in a heartbeat but searches are proving futile so that may take a long time.

thanks for all the thoughts!
Post Reply