The Future of Tubes?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

The Future of Tubes?

Post by neonblack »

http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2015/ ... uum-tubes/

Seems like this will open up a lot of possibilities for genuine tube dirt instead of emulations. Can't wait to see what some of our resident builders do with this tech.
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42256
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Chankgeez »

This + molecular junctions = :whoa: :wha?:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Inconuucl »

:drool:
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
User avatar
Gone Fission
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:50 pm
Location: The ungovernable tribal regions southwest of D.C.
Contact:

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Gone Fission »

I've lived through too many similar revolutionary developments in tube-replacement devices to invest much expectation in this go-round, but cool if it pans out.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by neonblack »

Chankgeez wrote:This + molecular junctions = :whoa: :wha?:
SCIENCE!
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by rfurtkamp »

Not really holding out much hope there for the same reasons as above.

Seen too many flash in the pans to note much.

The digital stuff keeps getting better and better and better, and doesn't die after 30k hours of being plugged in/run - if I think of all the pedals on my board that have been "on" for over 3.5 years....I just can't get worked up over this type of planned obsolescence either.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
Mudfuzz
HERO
HERO
Posts: 16705
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Mudfuzz »

this is boring, go buy an amp, or something Metasonix… or both...
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by neonblack »

You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
User avatar
rustywire
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4715
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:54 am
Location: on.

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by rustywire »

Now if only they'll find a solution to modernize input/output transformers; because currently there's 1 way to get that glorious saturated "big iron sound" and it's with big iron.
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... :whoa:
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
Image
User avatar
antennafarm
experienced
experienced
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:29 pm
Location: Delta City, MI

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by antennafarm »

toaaaaanfreekz and audiofiles have already said they don't sound as good as BIG OLD TUBES before they had a chance to... do anything.

cuz nothing sounded great out of solid state right!
ANTIMAGIC MEDIA - antimagic.net
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Jwar »

neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!

Agreed. I think this is a huge deal. Especially coming from a company like Korg. It's about fucking time someone did this. They do make tube for other non guitar/gear related things in this type of format. This is awesome.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
Mudfuzz
HERO
HERO
Posts: 16705
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Mudfuzz »

neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
it's still just stuff that is emulating/sounding like other stuff vs coming up with a actual new idea..
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42256
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Chankgeez »

There are no new ideas. :idea:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Dark Barn
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1801
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:12 am

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by Dark Barn »

Yeah, it's not the glass, it's the iron. Tubes don't weigh much, most tube amps are heavy due to the transformer. There are some light weight tube amp designs out there already that use regular old tubes but have SMPS power. Still these nutubes could be great, if they sound good.
I've been searchin' for the dolphins in the sea.

The Weak in Review: Weak Arguments Revue
User avatar
backwardsvoyager
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4216
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am

Re: The Future of Tubes?

Post by backwardsvoyager »

Mudfuzz wrote:
neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
it's still just stuff that is emulating/sounding like other stuff vs coming up with a actual new idea..
there's probably a lot that can be done with it outside of JOHN MAYER STADIUM TOUR TUBE TOANZ IN YOOOOOUR POCKET, but i kinda agree. i can see it just fueling the whole MINIATURE EVERYTHING fad and doing nothing else.
either way, as of now korg have done something really cool so we'll see where it goes i guess.

i think it's less about coming up with new ideas and more about the gear fiend demographic mostly not really taking the digital era seriously. people will happily play through spin chip pedals but still 'have' to have tube amps :?:
i want my gear built in Max/MSP goddamnit. the ideas are already there it's just too difficult for mere mortals to get the most out of without the programming/theoretical knowledge.
Post Reply