The Future of Tubes?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- neonblack
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 8090
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
- Location: Wilmington, NC
The Future of Tubes?
http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2015/ ... uum-tubes/
Seems like this will open up a lot of possibilities for genuine tube dirt instead of emulations. Can't wait to see what some of our resident builders do with this tech.
Seems like this will open up a lot of possibilities for genuine tube dirt instead of emulations. Can't wait to see what some of our resident builders do with this tech.
- Chankgeez
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 42256
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc
Re: The Future of Tubes?
This + molecular junctions =

…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
- Inconuucl
- Supporter

- Posts: 6407
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Gone Fission
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4926
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:50 pm
- Location: The ungovernable tribal regions southwest of D.C.
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Tubes?
I've lived through too many similar revolutionary developments in tube-replacement devices to invest much expectation in this go-round, but cool if it pans out.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
- neonblack
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 8090
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
- Location: Wilmington, NC
Re: The Future of Tubes?
SCIENCE!Chankgeez wrote:This + molecular junctions =![]()
- rfurtkamp
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 5774
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
- Location: Idaho
- Contact:
Re: The Future of Tubes?
Not really holding out much hope there for the same reasons as above.
Seen too many flash in the pans to note much.
The digital stuff keeps getting better and better and better, and doesn't die after 30k hours of being plugged in/run - if I think of all the pedals on my board that have been "on" for over 3.5 years....I just can't get worked up over this type of planned obsolescence either.
Seen too many flash in the pans to note much.
The digital stuff keeps getting better and better and better, and doesn't die after 30k hours of being plugged in/run - if I think of all the pedals on my board that have been "on" for over 3.5 years....I just can't get worked up over this type of planned obsolescence either.
- Mudfuzz
- HERO

- Posts: 16705
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
- Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Re: The Future of Tubes?
this is boring, go buy an amp, or something Metasonix… or both...
- neonblack
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 8090
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
- Location: Wilmington, NC
Re: The Future of Tubes?
You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
- rustywire
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:54 am
- Location: on.
Re: The Future of Tubes?
Now if only they'll find a solution to modernize input/output transformers; because currently there's 1 way to get that glorious saturated "big iron sound" and it's with big iron.
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... 
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
- antennafarm
- experienced

- Posts: 527
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:29 pm
- Location: Delta City, MI
Re: The Future of Tubes?
toaaaaanfreekz and audiofiles have already said they don't sound as good as BIG OLD TUBES before they had a chance to... do anything.
cuz nothing sounded great out of solid state right!
cuz nothing sounded great out of solid state right!
ANTIMAGIC MEDIA - antimagic.net
- Jwar
- Cosmic of BILF

- Posts: 18239
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
- Location: The edge of existence
Re: The Future of Tubes?
neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
Agreed. I think this is a huge deal. Especially coming from a company like Korg. It's about fucking time someone did this. They do make tube for other non guitar/gear related things in this type of format. This is awesome.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".
-JWAR
-JWAR
- Mudfuzz
- HERO

- Posts: 16705
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
- Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Re: The Future of Tubes?
it's still just stuff that is emulating/sounding like other stuff vs coming up with a actual new idea..neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
- Chankgeez
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 42256
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc
Re: The Future of Tubes?
There are no new ideas. 
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
- Dark Barn
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:12 am
Re: The Future of Tubes?
Yeah, it's not the glass, it's the iron. Tubes don't weigh much, most tube amps are heavy due to the transformer. There are some light weight tube amp designs out there already that use regular old tubes but have SMPS power. Still these nutubes could be great, if they sound good.
- backwardsvoyager
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4216
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:52 am
Re: The Future of Tubes?
there's probably a lot that can be done with it outside of JOHN MAYER STADIUM TOUR TUBE TOANZ IN YOOOOOUR POCKET, but i kinda agree. i can see it just fueling the whole MINIATURE EVERYTHING fad and doing nothing else.Mudfuzz wrote:it's still just stuff that is emulating/sounding like other stuff vs coming up with a actual new idea..neonblack wrote:You guys aren't thinking big enough. Or small enough? You can make a tube head that doesn't weigh 800 pounds! Tube amp-in-a-box pedals with real tubes in small boxes. Unique awesome oscillating tube fuzz. Parallel tube/molecular junction distortion!
either way, as of now korg have done something really cool so we'll see where it goes i guess.
i think it's less about coming up with new ideas and more about the gear fiend demographic mostly not really taking the digital era seriously. people will happily play through spin chip pedals but still 'have' to have tube amps
i want my gear built in Max/MSP goddamnit. the ideas are already there it's just too difficult for mere mortals to get the most out of without the programming/theoretical knowledge.
