George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
benjuro
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Massachusetts

George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by benjuro »

Not looking to start a battle here, just hoping for some input on peeps' experience with the solderless cable pedalboard routine. Wanting to save some space with the teeny plugs, so I think the Planet Waves are out, but these other three are pretty much the same $$$...and of course I'm open to hearing about other options I'm not aware of.
They're going to be set and forget, used for a pedalboard with fixed pedals that rarely if ever change, so plug->unplug->plug->unplug worries are not so big.
Special low-frequency version.
User avatar
Holy Schnikes
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6587
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:05 pm
Location: Taint Louis

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by Holy Schnikes »

I prefer the Lava kit for a few reasons. Sound is full and well balanced as opposed to the harsh/brittle highs I've heard with the George L and Bill L stuff. Also, Lava is way easy to assemble with tiny RA plugs and very low failure rate, most likely due to the design which makes grounding simple and reliable.

The reason I went with a solderless option was simply to save space with custom lengths and cram more shit on my board without a mess of cable everywhere. Changing things up is easier as well. Those reasons alone were worth it to me but I gotta admit, they sound FAR better than the Monster patch cables I had previously, undeniably, and I'm no cable snob.
univalve wrote:Boner on Fire Wallet Panties!
User avatar
julius_deane
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1980
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 12:27 pm
Location: Saint Louis
Contact:

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by julius_deane »

I have George L's because that's what was on sale on MF when I bought them, and I continue to buy them because that's what the shop close to my house carries.

I've never noticed any difference between one cable and another as far as tone goes, but the intricacies of tone don't really matter to me. Plus I tend to like things that some people might call "awful."
i'm a grrnoise
User avatar
valentine1
involved
involved
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:33 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by valentine1 »

i have a lava kit arriving in the mail, as well as a few ELC cables to finish my rig. purchased all this for the same reasons as holy schnikes^ described - i've used george L's before and didn't like them too much because of that mild harshness. when plugging straight into my amp with the lava ELC, it just sounds better. their solderless pedalboard kit is pretty damn appealing, and most people say it's reliable as. this gets my vote!
User avatar
sylnau
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10403
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:38 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by sylnau »

I have Lava nickel plugs right angle and Evidence Audio Monorail cable.
The Lava plugs are easy to connect and take less space.
The Monorail cable sound great... no need for a buffer on my board.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." --John Cage

http://www.youtube.com/sylnau
User avatar
FuzzHugger
Admin
Admin
Posts: 6116
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by FuzzHugger »

I had some failing cables with the George L's...also, the plating started flaking off them after a year or so, with the metal flakes ending up inside pedals. :erm:
User avatar
Gunner Recall
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4828
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: NY

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by Gunner Recall »

I'm a big fan of lava, no complaints here.
Easy to construct (at least imo) and they are TINY. More pedals on the board = good times.
I made about 15 in various lengths that I've had for a while, not one failure.
There are some that call me...morningstaru?
User avatar
proroby
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1091
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:59 am
Location: Wilmington, DE

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by proroby »

I have only used lava cables as far as solder less goes. I think they sound great and were a huge improvement from my random boss cables I had prior. My only qualm is that when you rearrange your board a lot, like I do, which I know you said isn't a problem for you, that they can start to loosen. I've gotten in the habit now of retightening them every time now though so it isn't a huge thing.

Don't mean to sound negative, I love lava cables :thumb: just splitting hairs.
There's a snake in my boots. Someone poisoned the waterhole!
User avatar
NakedInTheRain
interested
interested
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 7:30 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by NakedInTheRain »

i have the lava solderless. takes a bit of practice to make them. but they're very nice.
fuzzes on board: handpainted fuzz factory x2, EQD hoof, fuzzhugger ab-synth
User avatar
benjuro
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1826
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:49 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Re: George L's vs. Lava vs. Bill Lawrence vs. ...?

Post by benjuro »

Thanks for all the input, exactly what I needed to hear :hug:
Special low-frequency version.
Post Reply