Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
StopReferencing
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: The South of the North

Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by StopReferencing »

Can anyone describe for me the similarities/differences betwixt these three circuits?

I heard some lead on a record that is allegedly Bosstone'd, kind of blew my mind. It was fucking gnarly. Like, gnarlier than a Superfuzz. What's the deal?
Image
User avatar
hbombgraphics
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8654
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:39 pm
Location: Central NY

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by hbombgraphics »

No clue, but posting here so I can be informed quickly when Devin answers.
Gunner Recall wrote:This thread is bad and everyone in it should feel bad.
Iommic Pope wrote:This thread is mediocre at best, but I encourage everyone posting in it to feel as awesome as possible.
https://soundcloud.com/hbombgraphics
User avatar
John Lyons
committed
committed
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:32 am

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by John Lyons »

Bosstone is kind of a gnarly yet controlled circuit but it's not overblown and sloppy by itself.
Kind of a rough distortion with a fuzz edge. Can have a lower octave growl to it.
Keep in mind that there are 5 different versions of the "bosstone". There is one main
version though, and that's the one represented in the online schematics.
That was the one made for the longest run... This circuit is dependent on the
gain of the transistors. The originals used under 200 hfe transistors.

Superfuzz is thicker with an upper octave growl which generates all those harmonics that
make it sound distinctive. The tone switch goes from high end bite to scooped mids which is
thick but not as cutting of a tone. Much more of a "fuzz".

Fuzzrite has a nasty bass shy hard fuzz sound that pans over to a lower gain course fuzz with less
sizzle. In the middle position it gets growly and semi octavish overtones. Not really a fat fuzz in any setting
by itself. Firmly placed in the 60 thin nasty fuzz camp.

All of these depend on the amp and how hard it's pushed...which will fill in some gaps and deficiencies in the
overall sound.

Hope that helps. :)
User avatar
StopReferencing
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: The South of the North

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by StopReferencing »

That's a huge help, John - thanks!

I have what I think is a pretty neat Superfuzz-variant - was trying to get some of those really nasty spitty leads I was hearing on Miles Davis' "Big Fun," wasn't working.

The Catalinbread Merkin had my attention (as it's probably louder than a typical Fuzzrite, and loud is good [or at least above unity]), but the demos make it sound like it's not quite as wild as I'd like it to be.

FWIW, I had a Malekko B:Assmaster for a while, couldn't ever really bond with it. I liked the thing, but it always had this...pinched? sound that I couldn't dial out. I wanted it wild and spitty rather than keening. The Merkin sounds kind of like the B:Assmaster to me, and I think I read somewhere that they (Brassmaster and Fuzzrite) sound somewhat similar...could be my imagination though.

Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up? I don't know if "controlled" is what I'm looking for.
Last edited by StopReferencing on Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
John Lyons
committed
committed
Posts: 290
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:32 am

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by John Lyons »

The Merkin is fairly similar to the Fuzzrite in operation but has more body to
the sound and is more variable, louder as well.

Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up?

I don't think any of them had higher gain transistors but some of the versions
were wilder, yes. BUT if you put high gain transistors in the circuit it will get
wild for sure...out of control oscillation possibly but that's your issue to work out. :p

I'd build the Merkin as you have a better chance of hitting the sound you want.
It's got a lot more flexibility on tap.

Ah just build both. It's cost you a whopping $20 probably. :lol:
Officer Bukowski
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by Officer Bukowski »

What was the mind blowing, fuzz laden record in question? Sounds cool haha

dev always says the ibanez standard fuzz is the nasty superfuzz sound that you want.
I make pedals. SHARK TANK
User avatar
StopReferencing
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: The South of the North

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by StopReferencing »

Ehhhhh y'all are gonna think this is lame. Just...try to contextualize.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVvIovxPaA[/youtube]
Image
User avatar
kosta
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5561
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:00 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by kosta »

I love this era Miles. No need to apologize for this. Some of the baddest records around. Where's the searing guitar part though? Wiki says McLaughlin was using a wah on this stuff mostly.
Object Object : Bandcamp | Soundcloud
A lil dreamy, a lil noisy.
User avatar
Gunner Recall
moderator
moderator
Posts: 4828
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: NY

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by Gunner Recall »

Naw mang that IS a killer fuzz track

John pretty much nailed it.
There are some that call me...morningstaru?
Hacken
committed
committed
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:16 am

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by Hacken »

yeah that was kind of lame, like 6 minutes of horns and shaft guitars for 1½ minute of freaky lead that pans all over the room. But hey! Im drunk!
User avatar
StopReferencing
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: The South of the North

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by StopReferencing »

kosta wrote:Where's the searing guitar part though?


Starting at 6:41.

Hacken wrote:yeah that was kind of lame, like 6 minutes of horns and shaft guitars for 1½ minute of freaky lead that pans all over the room. But hey! Im drunk!


:lol: That description makes it sound not-at-all-lame.

It's just dated/unfashionable. Bob the Robot needs to come in here and call me a hipster thirty times.
Image
User avatar
kosta
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5561
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:00 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by kosta »

Of the stuff I've had, I'd say a boosted Bosstone would get the closest to that. Maybe the right Fuzzrite. The Superfuzz variant that I have is more octave-y and less blister-y than that. That sounds badass whatever he's playing!
Object Object : Bandcamp | Soundcloud
A lil dreamy, a lil noisy.
User avatar
StopReferencing
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1165
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: The South of the North

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by StopReferencing »

kosta wrote:Of the stuff I've had, I'd say a boosted Bosstone would get the closest to that. Maybe the right Fuzzrite. The Superfuzz variant that I have is more octave-y and less blister-y than that. That sounds badass whatever he's playing!


Blister-y is definitely what I'm looking for - emailing back and forth with Mr. Lyons about it. And I agree - pret-ty badass.
Image
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by Dandolin »

Wiki'd :love: :cool:

John Lyons wrote:Bosstone is kind of a gnarly yet controlled circuit but it's not overblown and sloppy by itself.
Kind of a rough distortion with a fuzz edge. Can have a lower octave growl to it.
Keep in mind that there are 5 different versions of the "bosstone". There is one main
version though, and that's the one represented in the online schematics.
That was the one made for the longest run... This circuit is dependent on the
gain of the transistors. The originals used under 200 hfe transistors.

Superfuzz is thicker with an upper octave growl which generates all those harmonics that
make it sound distinctive. The tone switch goes from high end bite to scooped mids which is
thick but not as cutting of a tone. Much more of a "fuzz".

Fuzzrite has a nasty bass shy hard fuzz sound that pans over to a lower gain course fuzz with less
sizzle. In the middle position it gets growly and semi octavish overtones. Not really a fat fuzz in any setting
by itself. Firmly placed in the 60 thin nasty fuzz camp.

All of these depend on the amp and how hard it's pushed...which will fill in some gaps and deficiencies in the
overall sound.

Hope that helps. :)
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
wsas3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2406
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:24 pm
Location: NYC

Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?

Post by wsas3 »

StopReferencing wrote:
kosta wrote:Where's the searing guitar part though?
Bob the Robot needs to come in here and call me a hipster thirty times.

I gotta say from when I ast saw you, you had the beard down :lol:
But seriously it oks pretty boss :thumb:
Chankgeez wrote:True, but you can also use the Klon as a tremolo. Just stomp on the switch as fast or slow as you'd like.
Good dealings with: benjuro, hatshirt(2), Eric!, insubordination, theavondon, skullservant, Ilikewater, GardenoftheDead, AndyTran, behndy, JerryTRCD, StopReferencing, philibis, jfrey, bob the robot, Noise..., space60y(x2), jskadiang, Ryan(2), Helter, mordecainyc, many more
Post Reply