Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- StopReferencing
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
- Location: The South of the North
Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Can anyone describe for me the similarities/differences betwixt these three circuits?
I heard some lead on a record that is allegedly Bosstone'd, kind of blew my mind. It was fucking gnarly. Like, gnarlier than a Superfuzz. What's the deal?
I heard some lead on a record that is allegedly Bosstone'd, kind of blew my mind. It was fucking gnarly. Like, gnarlier than a Superfuzz. What's the deal?

- hbombgraphics
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 8654
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: Central NY
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
No clue, but posting here so I can be informed quickly when Devin answers.
Gunner Recall wrote:This thread is bad and everyone in it should feel bad.
https://soundcloud.com/hbombgraphicsIommic Pope wrote:This thread is mediocre at best, but I encourage everyone posting in it to feel as awesome as possible.
- John Lyons
- committed

- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:32 am
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Bosstone is kind of a gnarly yet controlled circuit but it's not overblown and sloppy by itself.
Kind of a rough distortion with a fuzz edge. Can have a lower octave growl to it.
Keep in mind that there are 5 different versions of the "bosstone". There is one main
version though, and that's the one represented in the online schematics.
That was the one made for the longest run... This circuit is dependent on the
gain of the transistors. The originals used under 200 hfe transistors.
Superfuzz is thicker with an upper octave growl which generates all those harmonics that
make it sound distinctive. The tone switch goes from high end bite to scooped mids which is
thick but not as cutting of a tone. Much more of a "fuzz".
Fuzzrite has a nasty bass shy hard fuzz sound that pans over to a lower gain course fuzz with less
sizzle. In the middle position it gets growly and semi octavish overtones. Not really a fat fuzz in any setting
by itself. Firmly placed in the 60 thin nasty fuzz camp.
All of these depend on the amp and how hard it's pushed...which will fill in some gaps and deficiencies in the
overall sound.
Hope that helps.
Kind of a rough distortion with a fuzz edge. Can have a lower octave growl to it.
Keep in mind that there are 5 different versions of the "bosstone". There is one main
version though, and that's the one represented in the online schematics.
That was the one made for the longest run... This circuit is dependent on the
gain of the transistors. The originals used under 200 hfe transistors.
Superfuzz is thicker with an upper octave growl which generates all those harmonics that
make it sound distinctive. The tone switch goes from high end bite to scooped mids which is
thick but not as cutting of a tone. Much more of a "fuzz".
Fuzzrite has a nasty bass shy hard fuzz sound that pans over to a lower gain course fuzz with less
sizzle. In the middle position it gets growly and semi octavish overtones. Not really a fat fuzz in any setting
by itself. Firmly placed in the 60 thin nasty fuzz camp.
All of these depend on the amp and how hard it's pushed...which will fill in some gaps and deficiencies in the
overall sound.
Hope that helps.

http://basicaudio.net/
I love fonzie
I love fonzie
- StopReferencing
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
- Location: The South of the North
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
That's a huge help, John - thanks!
I have what I think is a pretty neat Superfuzz-variant - was trying to get some of those really nasty spitty leads I was hearing on Miles Davis' "Big Fun," wasn't working.
The Catalinbread Merkin had my attention (as it's probably louder than a typical Fuzzrite, and loud is good [or at least above unity]), but the demos make it sound like it's not quite as wild as I'd like it to be.
FWIW, I had a Malekko B:Assmaster for a while, couldn't ever really bond with it. I liked the thing, but it always had this...pinched? sound that I couldn't dial out. I wanted it wild and spitty rather than keening. The Merkin sounds kind of like the B:Assmaster to me, and I think I read somewhere that they (Brassmaster and Fuzzrite) sound somewhat similar...could be my imagination though.
Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up? I don't know if "controlled" is what I'm looking for.
I have what I think is a pretty neat Superfuzz-variant - was trying to get some of those really nasty spitty leads I was hearing on Miles Davis' "Big Fun," wasn't working.
The Catalinbread Merkin had my attention (as it's probably louder than a typical Fuzzrite, and loud is good [or at least above unity]), but the demos make it sound like it's not quite as wild as I'd like it to be.
FWIW, I had a Malekko B:Assmaster for a while, couldn't ever really bond with it. I liked the thing, but it always had this...pinched? sound that I couldn't dial out. I wanted it wild and spitty rather than keening. The Merkin sounds kind of like the B:Assmaster to me, and I think I read somewhere that they (Brassmaster and Fuzzrite) sound somewhat similar...could be my imagination though.
Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up? I don't know if "controlled" is what I'm looking for.
Last edited by StopReferencing on Fri Aug 26, 2011 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

- John Lyons
- committed

- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:32 am
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
The Merkin is fairly similar to the Fuzzrite in operation but has more body to
the sound and is more variable, louder as well.
Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up?
I don't think any of them had higher gain transistors but some of the versions
were wilder, yes. BUT if you put high gain transistors in the circuit it will get
wild for sure...out of control oscillation possibly but that's your issue to work out.
I'd build the Merkin as you have a better chance of hitting the sound you want.
It's got a lot more flexibility on tap.
Ah just build both. It's cost you a whopping $20 probably.
the sound and is more variable, louder as well.
Did Bosstones with higher gain trannies sound more fucked-up?
I don't think any of them had higher gain transistors but some of the versions
were wilder, yes. BUT if you put high gain transistors in the circuit it will get
wild for sure...out of control oscillation possibly but that's your issue to work out.
I'd build the Merkin as you have a better chance of hitting the sound you want.
It's got a lot more flexibility on tap.
Ah just build both. It's cost you a whopping $20 probably.

http://basicaudio.net/
I love fonzie
I love fonzie
-
Officer Bukowski
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3307
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:13 pm
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
What was the mind blowing, fuzz laden record in question? Sounds cool haha
dev always says the ibanez standard fuzz is the nasty superfuzz sound that you want.
dev always says the ibanez standard fuzz is the nasty superfuzz sound that you want.
I make pedals. SHARK TANK
- StopReferencing
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
- Location: The South of the North
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Ehhhhh y'all are gonna think this is lame. Just...try to contextualize.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVvIovxPaA[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVvIovxPaA[/youtube]

- kosta
- Supporter

- Posts: 5561
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:00 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
I love this era Miles. No need to apologize for this. Some of the baddest records around. Where's the searing guitar part though? Wiki says McLaughlin was using a wah on this stuff mostly.
- Gunner Recall
- moderator

- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NY
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Naw mang that IS a killer fuzz track
John pretty much nailed it.
John pretty much nailed it.
There are some that call me...morningstaru?
-
Hacken
- committed

- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:16 am
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
yeah that was kind of lame, like 6 minutes of horns and shaft guitars for 1½ minute of freaky lead that pans all over the room. But hey! Im drunk!
- StopReferencing
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
- Location: The South of the North
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
kosta wrote:Where's the searing guitar part though?
Starting at 6:41.
Hacken wrote:yeah that was kind of lame, like 6 minutes of horns and shaft guitars for 1½ minute of freaky lead that pans all over the room. But hey! Im drunk!
That description makes it sound not-at-all-lame.It's just dated/unfashionable. Bob the Robot needs to come in here and call me a hipster thirty times.

- kosta
- Supporter

- Posts: 5561
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:00 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Of the stuff I've had, I'd say a boosted Bosstone would get the closest to that. Maybe the right Fuzzrite. The Superfuzz variant that I have is more octave-y and less blister-y than that. That sounds badass whatever he's playing!
- StopReferencing
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1165
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:41 pm
- Location: The South of the North
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
kosta wrote:Of the stuff I've had, I'd say a boosted Bosstone would get the closest to that. Maybe the right Fuzzrite. The Superfuzz variant that I have is more octave-y and less blister-y than that. That sounds badass whatever he's playing!
Blister-y is definitely what I'm looking for - emailing back and forth with Mr. Lyons about it. And I agree - pret-ty badass.

- Dandolin
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 11125
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
- Location: On the pharm in PA
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
Wiki'd
John Lyons wrote:Bosstone is kind of a gnarly yet controlled circuit but it's not overblown and sloppy by itself.
Kind of a rough distortion with a fuzz edge. Can have a lower octave growl to it.
Keep in mind that there are 5 different versions of the "bosstone". There is one main
version though, and that's the one represented in the online schematics.
That was the one made for the longest run... This circuit is dependent on the
gain of the transistors. The originals used under 200 hfe transistors.
Superfuzz is thicker with an upper octave growl which generates all those harmonics that
make it sound distinctive. The tone switch goes from high end bite to scooped mids which is
thick but not as cutting of a tone. Much more of a "fuzz".
Fuzzrite has a nasty bass shy hard fuzz sound that pans over to a lower gain course fuzz with less
sizzle. In the middle position it gets growly and semi octavish overtones. Not really a fat fuzz in any setting
by itself. Firmly placed in the 60 thin nasty fuzz camp.
All of these depend on the amp and how hard it's pushed...which will fill in some gaps and deficiencies in the
overall sound.
Hope that helps.
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
- wsas3
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2406
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:24 pm
- Location: NYC
Re: Fuzzrite vs. Bosstone vs. Superfuzz?
StopReferencing wrote:Bob the Robot needs to come in here and call me a hipster thirty times.kosta wrote:Where's the searing guitar part though?
I gotta say from when I ast saw you, you had the beard down
But seriously it oks pretty boss
Good dealings with: benjuro, hatshirt(2), Eric!, insubordination, theavondon, skullservant, Ilikewater, GardenoftheDead, AndyTran, behndy, JerryTRCD, StopReferencing, philibis, jfrey, bob the robot, Noise..., space60y(x2), jskadiang, Ryan(2), Helter, mordecainyc, many moreChankgeez wrote:True, but you can also use the Klon as a tremolo. Just stomp on the switch as fast or slow as you'd like.