
NAD's got a GW headed his way!
nad wrote:1) Tired of my Muff Type Thing getting buried in a mix. I don't need this one to cut (I have plenty of Brassmasters for that), but I need something that has actual mids, and this sounds like it do.
The Great Wall is its own thing with a non-Muff-related circuit (so I wouldn't want someone expecting a Muff variant)...but I
was attempting to get into some Muff-Type territory from a fresh angle, and (hopefully) without the same limitations. My goal was something more alive and natural, less buzzy, more lows but still balanced... And with the controls in the V3 and Dlx, it's something that goes "both cleaner and freakier than the Big Muff Pi," as Agreed once put it.
Of course, experiences vary, but the Great Wall
should deliver more mids than a "Muff Type Thing"...the lack of tone control means that frequencies aren't being drastically dampened or filtered out. The Fuzz control can dial in more focus when needed.
nad wrote:2) Wondering of any concern with actives/buffers since I run an octave pedal first in line quite frequently, and occasionally use my G&L L-2000 which could probably drive a speaker cabinet if need be.
4) I stupidly sold my AB-Synth and need another Hug from Fuzzer, although I don't really need any of the oscillation stuff since I already have several such fuxxes that only see sporadic usage.
If you didn't have trouble with the AB-Synth in similar situations/placement, I don't think you'll have trouble with the Great Wall. I don't
recommend running my pedals after a buffer, but that's as a general "catch all" to avoid the problems some buffers cause with fuzzes.
I know I'm saying this all after the fact, but maybe this thread can help others thinking about a Great Wall!
