Re: Pedals you wish existed?
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:26 pm
Copilot TAKES THE LEAD.
YES! And also with a square wave LFO one could make it jump back and forth between them.stripes wrote:i want fuzz with a CV controlled EQ filter thingy of some sort. to fade live from the "listening through a telephone" to full blown real life fuzz
in that case you would probably want a band pass filter after the fuzz with the CV controlling the band width and another knob controlling the center frequency, then you could use the CV to fade between the bandlimited 'telephone' sound and the full frequency fuzz toan. I reckon that would sound great.stripes wrote:i want fuzz with a CV controlled EQ filter thingy of some sort. to fade live from the "listening through a telephone" to full blown real life fuzz
I personally would have more use for a large box with an lfo that you can adjust the depth, rate and waveshape of (because i dont sync everything up, but others may have more use for small boxes with just cv jacks)autopilot wrote:for the guys wanting CV controllable fuzzes, some questions
-Would you prefer a larger case with built in lfo and multiple parameter $200-300
-Small case with cv jack for a single parameter - sub $100
-Medium case with 2/3 parameter via cv independent cv jacks - $150-200
and what parameters would you prefer to be cv'able - volume, oscillation (feedback loop alike), voices, tone, bias/texture, other
YEH! trying to get my hands on one of those currentlyamnesiac305 wrote:Fairfield 4eyes does this in a limited manner.
I'm one of the few who doesn't really care much about the size of his pedals. If I had a master touring rig then I would probably get them all condensed into a makeshift modular synth. But I guess the "medium" option seems most reasonable. Unless the pedal is digital, in which case designers really should consider some programmable or dipswitchable CV options, it's not about having full modular control over everything just because the spaghetti would get a little out of control. Well, I would love full modular control but at that point Euro or 5U is probably a more practical form factor. I mean, Koma pedals handle it all quite well, but then they're probably too big and expensive for a lot of people.autopilot wrote:for the guys wanting CV controllable fuzzes, some questions
-Would you prefer a larger case with built in lfo and multiple parameter $200-300
-Small case with cv jack for a single parameter - sub $100
-Medium case with 2/3 parameter via cv independent cv jacks - $150-200
and what parameters would you prefer to be cv'able - volume, oscillation (feedback loop alike), voices, tone, bias/texture, other
You want to be able to control the sweep of the flange. The expression factory can do that. You want to control the speed of the lfo controlling the sweep, the ex-7 can do that too and all kind of crazy cool shit. It's quite the versatile beast.Zander wrote:So I went looking to see if this is accurate:wfs1234 wrote:I was just thinking this, and I don't know why I didn't think of mentioning it sooner. It's exactly what mine did, and I'm pretty sure that's exactly what you're looking for Zander.hollowhero wrote:That sounds like what the digitech expression factory does on the ada flanger modeZander wrote:I keep bringing this up. I still want it made...
A flanger pedal on a treadle where you're able to control the sweep of the flange by sweeping the treadle. So when the toe is down the "sheeeee" part of the "jet" is sounding and then the heel is down the "shooooo" part is sounding.
http://www.digitech.com/system/document ... nglish.pdf
So what is described sounds like it might be close, but I don't know that I'm convinced that it's actually what I'm looking for. The "swoosh" of a flanger is caused by the LFO (low frequency oscillator). What I'm saying I'd like is for the function of the LFO to be replaced by the motion of the treadle. Yes, as stated above, I'd love a flanger inside a wah enclosure, but I don't want the "manual" or the "speed" or the "regen" or the "depth" controlled by the treadle. I want to be able to "swoosh" when I want the "swoosh" to happen, not because I've started the song at the "right" part of the regular action of the LFO and get the rhythm exactly right for everything to match.
If I'm playing Van Halen "Unchained" I'd like to be able to recreate that exactly because I have control of the swoosh by making the flange effect swoosh because I'm moving the pedal.
The Digitech Expression factory may do that - I honestly don't know.
I feel like it's so hard to describe the effect I want and how I want to control that effect... I hope this was clear.
Thanks!
I totally agree, they are really cool, but they are also @*&^!ing expensive these days. !*&%@ing ripofftrace wrote:For all you guys who are into cv/lfo controllable stuff and assignable expression pedals, you should check out the Clavia nord modular / micro modular synths. You can make some really amazing effects patches, like 95% of what's been posted in this thread, but you have to use a true bypass box or something to make it work on a pedalboard. Which brings me to my dream pedal. A nord modular unit made from the ground up as a stopbox!