Uncle Grandfather wrote:People with things I can't afford.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Uncle Grandfather wrote:People with things I can't afford.


"People with things I can't afford". Looking at the stuff from your collection I've seen, I'm not sure those people exist, UG.Uncle Grandfather wrote:i thought mojo was for the hipsters...i'm always getting these things confused. People with things I can't afford. I'd just assume call them all that.KaosCill8r wrote:I have to say that I'm a big fan of clones. Only because I'm not chasing any other guitarists tone, so the sound I can get out of whatever pedal is more than good enough for me. So long as it sounds decent, then I'm happy. Also I probably couldn't afford the original pedal and mojo is for the blooze lawyers.
Deals:friendship wrote:You motherfuckers think I won't fuck up a couple octoroks and assemble the Triforce?

Eivind August wrote:
Also, I'm with the clone crew.

Uncle Grandfather wrote:dont you go badmouthing no mojoWes Mantooth wrote:I still have yet to play through any fuzz with any kind of 'vintage mojo.' I just don't buy it at all and I'll happily stick to my assumption and save shit-tons of money

it makes me wonder where the mojo comes from...was it only made in the 60 70s? Cause I have vintage pedals that still cop those classic vintage tones...I thought maybe the mojo was from aging parts but that doesn't seem to be the case.Wes Mantooth wrote:Uncle Grandfather wrote: dont you go badmouthing no mojo![]()
I totally understand how vintage originals can sound different and lead to people preferring it. But I think the widespread notion that expensive mojo parts/vintage pedals automatically equal better sound is bullshit. Thankfully no one really seems to think that here and just goes by their ears

