Page 3 of 3
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 12:37 pm
by smallsnd/bigsnd
the tide has shifted!
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:16 pm
by goroth
smallsnd/bigsnd wrote:the tide has shifted!
Go option two, go!
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:54 pm
by backwardsvoyager
goroth wrote:smallsnd/bigsnd wrote:the tide has shifted!
Go option two, go!
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:06 pm
by Achtane
backwardsvoyager wrote:goroth wrote:smallsnd/bigsnd wrote:the tide has shifted!
Go option two, go!
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:15 pm
by misterstomach
i still stick with option 1. though the switch would be cool if it were possible. sounds like an awesome delay in the works. if we're throwing out ideas, tap tempo is stupid but footswitchable modulation is awesome. so is stereo.
Re: a quick question about delays and dirt
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:24 pm
by Eric!
Achtane wrote:backwardsvoyager wrote:goroth wrote:smallsnd/bigsnd wrote:the tide has shifted!
Go option two, go!