function f(x) Clusterfuzz / Third Rail [ongoing reviews]

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

tuj wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt8jgvcTrXY[/youtube]
Nice sounding demo, tuj, but why you using your outside voice?
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by neonblack »

Chankgeez wrote:
tuj wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt8jgvcTrXY[/youtube]
Nice sounding demo, tuj, but why you using your Jwar voice?
User avatar
culturejam
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Nueva Yersey

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by culturejam »

Nice demos guys! (chank and tuj)

We really appreciate it.
Disclaimer #1: Co-Founder, Product Developer at Function f(x).
User avatar
culturejam
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Nueva Yersey

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by culturejam »

David Torn posted another demo, and he found a way to coax some octave DOWN out of the Clusterfuzz. We totally did not design for this, and none of us noticed this during *months* of testing. So we're very surprised, but also kinda stoked.

Disclaimer #1: Co-Founder, Product Developer at Function f(x).
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

Yeah, that Torn octave down setting is crazy. I still haven't totally been able to recreate that. I'm gonna keep trying though. There's so many sounds in the Clusterfuzz.
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
Mrkiammi
uncommitted
uncommitted
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 22, 2015 10:45 am

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Mrkiammi »

culturejam wrote:David Torn posted another demo, and he found a way to coax some octave DOWN out of the Clusterfuzz. We totally did not design for this, and none of us noticed this during *months* of testing. So we're very surprised, but also kinda stoked.

I Think its Way cool, what This pedal Can do, i am currious what did you guys design for, what tone, style, artist
did you have in mind, when This pedal was on the work?
User avatar
culturejam
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Nueva Yersey

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by culturejam »

Honestly, we didn't have any particular target for an artist sound or "classic" fuzz circuit. The goal simply: let's try our best to do something new. I know that sounds cliche and hokey, but it's really what we aimed for.

So the original goal for tone was "heavy, tight, focused fuzz with a responsive tone control and a buttload of output volume". After about 5 fails on that, we came up with a circuit that really hit the mark. I did the initial design work to get to the core sound, and then I realized I could do a little modification and make it sound like it's about to explode. And then the other guys in the company added some outstanding tweaks (including the clipper rotary switch, input filter switch, relay bypass system, reworked input amp stage). As challenging as it is to work as a committee sometimes, the Clusterfuzz is a fantastic example of a true group effort. Sorry to gush. :)
Disclaimer #1: Co-Founder, Product Developer at Function f(x).
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

I was just playing some lap steel with the Clusterfuzz. Messing around with volume and tone knobs on the steel. Sounded great.

Settings:
volume - noon
tone - cranked
fuzz - cranked
8-bit - cranked
filter - to the right
clipping - none

I'll try to record some clips tomorrow.
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
culturejam
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Nueva Yersey

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by culturejam »

Thanks for that, Chank. I don't have a lap steel, but I'll give it a shot with a Les Paul and a slide.

BTW, there is a Clusterfuzz giveaway on Reverb:
https://reverb.com/page/function-f-x-cl ... z-giveaway
Disclaimer #1: Co-Founder, Product Developer at Function f(x).
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by neonblack »

I entered and did everything I could to get the extra entries. Not getting my hopes up but I loved this pedal when I borrowed it. My favorite setting is the one Chank just posted. Awesome synthy squared fuzz that's still somehow responsive and dynamic. :love:
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

You're welcome, culturejam. Didn't know about the giveaway. That's awesome.

Also, with the steel I usually had the volume rolled a quarter of the way back and the tone rolled about half way off. The Clusterfuzz is pretty responsive to changes in the volume and tone knobs. Lots of fantastic sounds comin' outta that fuzz.

Yeah, neon, I tried it with the FET or LED clipping that I frequently prefer, but there's more presence with the no clipping option.
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

OK, new setting for the lap steel. I was looking for a little more clarity and definition:

Settings:
volume - 3:00
tone - cranked
fuzz - all the way off
8-bit - cranked
filter - to the left
clipping - none
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

Everyone's favorite demo dude, ladies & gentlemen, I present to you, Gearmanndude:

[youtube][/youtube]
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
culturejam
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2381
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 5:25 pm
Location: Nueva Yersey

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by culturejam »

I really feel like nobody (except JustNick) has shown the low-gain capabilities. But still, nice demo. :)
Disclaimer #1: Co-Founder, Product Developer at Function f(x).
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: function f(x) the Clusterfuzz /[an ongoing review]\

Post by Chankgeez »

Yeah, no surprise that GMD's demo is just straight up rockin' out.

I wasn't holding my breath that he'd use any low gain settings, but I was hoping he would anyway. :lol:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
Post Reply