Marshall for cleans?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- rustywire
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4715
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:54 am
- Location: on.
Re: Marshall for cleans?
Yes.
If JCM800 50 or 100 watt, try the low input. Especially one with 6550 power tubes.
JMPs and JTMs/4holers you have numerous options. Jumper the channels and prepare for dem toanz.
Not much of a fan of the 900 and after.
If JCM800 50 or 100 watt, try the low input. Especially one with 6550 power tubes.
JMPs and JTMs/4holers you have numerous options. Jumper the channels and prepare for dem toanz.
Not much of a fan of the 900 and after.
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... 
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
- waltdogg
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3181
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
- Location: hell, ca
Re: Marshall for cleans?
Oh yeah, that JCM800 had 6550s in it as well. I was always telling him to put EL34s in it but the tracks are of it still loaded with 6550s. I wouldn't change anything.
D.o.S. wrote:Why do people eat steak that shit is gross
behndy wrote: lol. she thinks Brazil is wayyyy too unsafe. but i got PLANS.
MechaGodzilla wrote:man, fuck those big neutrik plugs
- echodeluxe
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Marshall for cleans?
i wanna hear datwaltdogg wrote:An 800 with single coils dialed in just right is sooooo sweet. I tracked the guitars, bass and vocals for my friend's EP, his Ric and 800 made for the best sounding chiming guitars on the rhythm tracks.
- imJonWain
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1823
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:56 pm
- Location: AVl, NC
- Contact:
Re: Marshall for cleans?
I second the Laney AOR.... I use my AOR50 for mainly cleans/edge of breakup stuff, low input is great cranked or low pre-amp gain in high input, and these amps are seriously cheap, especially the combos since they look so heinous but you can just rehouse them into a head or new combo + they have a decent on board reverb.
"To my lay mind, the lobster's behavior in the kettle appears to be the expression of a preference; and it may well be that an ability to form preferences is the decisive criterion for real suffering."
http://www.TFRelectronics.com <project info
https://oshpark.com/profiles/TFRelectronics <oshpark shared boards
https://www.staticdisaster.com/ <my radio show
http://www.TFRelectronics.com <project info
https://oshpark.com/profiles/TFRelectronics <oshpark shared boards
https://www.staticdisaster.com/ <my radio show
- Meriphew
- involved

- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 5:19 pm
- Location: Seattle USA
Re: Marshall for cleans?
I have one as well. I agree 100%.Tristan wrote:Dude, old Marshall Plexi's are amazing clean.
I have a 2061X, it's got a surprising amount of headroom for only a 20 watt amp.
A bonus is that a great Marshall just takes dirt pedals really well and always makes it rock.
- waltdogg
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3181
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
- Location: hell, ca
Re: Marshall for cleans?
EDIT: Found it!echodeluxe wrote:i wanna hear datwaltdogg wrote:An 800 with single coils dialed in just right is sooooo sweet. I tracked the guitars, bass and vocals for my friend's EP, his Ric and 800 made for the best sounding chiming guitars on the rhythm tracks.
D.o.S. wrote:Why do people eat steak that shit is gross
behndy wrote: lol. she thinks Brazil is wayyyy too unsafe. but i got PLANS.
MechaGodzilla wrote:man, fuck those big neutrik plugs
- echodeluxe
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Marshall for cleans?
does sound really good. kinda chunky though. not totally clean
- waltdogg
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3181
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
- Location: hell, ca
Re: Marshall for cleans?
I think the pre-amp gain was set right on the edge of breakup. And the bass knob was turned up pretty high.
D.o.S. wrote:Why do people eat steak that shit is gross
behndy wrote: lol. she thinks Brazil is wayyyy too unsafe. but i got PLANS.
MechaGodzilla wrote:man, fuck those big neutrik plugs
- echodeluxe
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Marshall for cleans?
im looking for dat sparkly but big clean sound. no breakup.
- waltdogg
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3181
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2015 5:01 pm
- Location: hell, ca
Re: Marshall for cleans?
Same setup with less pre-amp gain would do that. Don't overthink it. 
D.o.S. wrote:Why do people eat steak that shit is gross
behndy wrote: lol. she thinks Brazil is wayyyy too unsafe. but i got PLANS.
MechaGodzilla wrote:man, fuck those big neutrik plugs
- goroth
- HERO

- Posts: 13514
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
- Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
- Contact:
Re: Marshall for cleans?
Me too, but on reflection I'd be willing to bet my pants that it is more to do with the typical fender/Marshall preamps and the typical fender/Marshall tonestacks than the actual tubes. Disregarding differences in output I don't know if there's that much difference in the actual sound of the tubes.echodeluxe wrote:ii just associate 6L6's with big fat cleans from like, fender amps. i always associated EL34's with brash mids heavy british distortion so, yeah. i dunno. obviously im a dumb dumb.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
- echodeluxe
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm
Re: Marshall for cleans?
I know that it ain't the tubes per se. tubes don't have a "sound".
my band recently added a third guitarist and he plays a JCM800 clean and its actually really nice. he needs to temper his treble a bit but other than that it sounds really cool. great contrast with my super reverb and my bandmates music man 65 combo.
my band recently added a third guitarist and he plays a JCM800 clean and its actually really nice. he needs to temper his treble a bit but other than that it sounds really cool. great contrast with my super reverb and my bandmates music man 65 combo.