Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Guitar tech, wiring, maintenance, projects, SOS calls, and more!

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
colossus
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Western Mass.
Contact:

Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by colossus »

So I really want to put together a shortscale Telecaster (either a custom or thinline). I figure I'll get a jaguar neck. I know the pocket will leave a gap, but that doesn't concern me. What concerns me is everything else...

So, I'll have to move the bridge up 1.5", that is for sure. Which means the bridge PUP will have to move as well. Which means custom pickguard. Is that all I will have to deal with? It doesn't sound too difficult...
User avatar
weed_killer
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1177
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 7:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by weed_killer »

yeah, that's it. If you get a body without a bridge route it may be easier for you, provided you have the tools. Bill Frisell has a telecaster with a jaguar neck:

Image
User avatar
Gone Fission
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4804
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:50 pm
Location: The ungovernable tribal regions southwest of D.C.
Contact:

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by Gone Fission »

For me, I wouldn't try to fuck with this unless either the body is made for the neck or the neck is made for the body. (I'm guessing the former is the cheaper option if you can find an accommodating shop.) If the best you can do is get an accommodating neck pocket, the bitch of it will be getting the bridge placement right, and with it the bridge pickup route. Like Weed-Killer said, omitting that pickup route and doing it yourself might make it smoother. A top-loader bridge would at least save you the trouble of the through-body string routing.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
User avatar
MEC
HERO
HERO
Posts: 4651
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:04 pm
Location: Old North State

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by MEC »

Image
http://youthministry.bandcamp.com/
http://remainstheband.bandcamp.com/
Achtane wrote:FUZZ ALL DAY MAN FUZZ IS GOD ALL OTHER EFFECTS ARE SHIT
Caesar wrote:Dude, can you get the fuck out of my b/s/t thread with your bullshit.
PumpkinPieces wrote: This isn't America, this is I Love Fuzz.
Mudfuzz wrote:Remember when we were all just a bunch of weirdos that liked fucked up shit and not just a bunch of nerds buying bling to impress each other online?
User avatar
doommeow
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2021
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:37 pm

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by doommeow »

Rondo. They've got 24" tele styles for <$100.

ICBW, but if the body and bridge measurements are designed for that scale, if you aren't happy with the stock neck it should be easy/easier to replace it with a Jaguar neck.
User avatar
fever606
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:03 pm
Location: district of columbia

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by fever606 »

User avatar
colossus
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1007
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Western Mass.
Contact:

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by colossus »

I've decided to just building a regular scale tele instead. Maybe another time!
User avatar
Swordfishtrombone
committed
committed
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:59 am
Location: Chicago

Re: Short-scale telecaster -- potential problems?

Post by Swordfishtrombone »

doommeow wrote:Rondo. They've got 24" tele styles for <$100.

ICBW, but if the body and bridge measurements are designed for that scale, if you aren't happy with the stock neck it should be easy/easier to replace it with a Jaguar neck.


I know OP said they decided to do a normal scale tele, but I figured I'd reply to this anyway. Based on one of their 24" strat copies that I had a few years ago, I'd avoid this unless you have small hands (or at least smaller than mine, since my hands are fairly big). The 24" scale strat copy's lower frets were awkward as fuck for me to play on because the neck was pretty narrow, so my hand was pretty cramped up there and I had to be careful to not unintentionally mute strings. It was well built, and sounded nice imo, but those lower frets made me hate playing the thing. This might be something worth considering if anyone else is considering this...
Image
Post Reply