three reverbs = overkill?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
resincum
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3883
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:30 am
Location: el paso

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by resincum »

Mike wrote:
echodeluxe wrote:I'm deciding between the rv-5 or a supernatural
Is it right that the Supernatural can do full wet signal?
yes
i'm glad i can call you a friend. even if i'll never see you again
Image
User avatar
whiskey_face
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:00 am

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by whiskey_face »

a 64 tube reverb unit and a supernatural.... moar is required
Image
good deals with Noise. . .guitmatt, magiclawnchair, delaydecay, Fuzz_Pi, nixhex113, theAntihero, Ancient Astronaught, bigchiefbc, jwojtysiak, neonblack, osbornkt

http://www.facebook.com/daughtersofzionaz
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by Jwar »

Technically I have four I think? So no, it's not overkill. :) It's like fuzz. Need moar no matter what!!!
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
rustywire
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4715
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:54 am
Location: on.

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by rustywire »

New name: 3verbdeluxe

(The answer is no)
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... :whoa:
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
Image
User avatar
PeteeBee
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2324
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2014 12:36 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by PeteeBee »

I'm looking to add one more in the fashion of a combo delay and verb pedal in the coming while. I know there are a ton now a days, just trying to dig around and find what overlaps the least with what I have going on and all that jazz.
Iommic Pope wrote:This is the best you've been.
Suffering suits you.
BitchPudding wrote:Let this be written in our history as proof that ILoveFuzz is one tight knit internet family.
User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by echodeluxe »

fart
User avatar
jrmy
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10645
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 11:09 am
Contact:

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by jrmy »

echodeluxe wrote:fart
With reverb, that would be "ffaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrttttttttttttt-t-t-t-t-t-t-tt-t-t--tt--tt-tt-t..."
I'm more like a mids-ist than a bassist.
"The main rule on ILF is don't be an asshole." - Tom Dalton
I can't wait to annoy the shit out of you with my mountain of mids. - bigchiefbc
https://thewirechimes.bandcamp.com/releases
http://crotchthrottle.bandcamp.com/
https://www.instagram.com/jrmyfuzz/
User avatar
Meta-
involved
involved
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:55 pm

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by Meta- »

Brandsmannen wrote:I thought I had kind of overkill reverb, but I realize now that I totally need more. I have an early cathedral, which I mostly use in conjunction with distortion (I find that colder/more digital reverbs work great with that), for MBV-ish reverse reverb stuff and it also doubles as a freeze pedal (infinite mod thing). Then there are a few delays between that and my eventide space, which I really use for all other reverb applications. Oh, and there is reverb on the el Capistan as well, but I mostly don't use it. I have an RV-3, and a liquid ambience on my want list.
mmm...bacon
good dils with: bronzetalonShishmanfred741 spacelordmotherHoly Schnikesbass_econo PumpkinPiecesindianDYsummerchuckjaywalksoniderosergiomunoz74toddtroutmanMSUsousaphoneChetMagongalo
Post Reply