three reverbs = overkill?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
sylnau
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10403
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:38 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by sylnau »

Hey we're on ILF... nothing is overkill in here. :snax:
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." --John Cage

http://www.youtube.com/sylnau
User avatar
Ghost Hip
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 am
Location: Detroit

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by Ghost Hip »

I remember when I had zero reverb pedals for years, I just assumed I didn't need one. now I have a digiverb and a supernatural and I sort of want a Boss Reverb... Its probably my favorite effect outside of fuzz.
Youtube Channel?
mr. sound boy king wrote: Organic apples are not normal, they are special, like analog, whereas normal apples, like digital, taste sterile and lack warmth.
friendship wrote: y u h8 swoosh woosh
User avatar
resincum
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3883
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:30 am
Location: el paso

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by resincum »

never enough verb
i'm glad i can call you a friend. even if i'll never see you again
Image
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

PumpkinPieces wrote:I remember when I had zero reverb pedals for years, I just assumed I didn't need one. now I have a digiverb and a supernatural and I sort of want a Boss Reverb... Its probably my favorite effect outside of fuzz.
Yeah, I always thought I never needed one, then got one and a couple of months later had 3 because reverb is the best ever.

Right now I've got a RRR near the beginning of my chain, 90% of the time on plate 1, either set light and pretty or full wet. Then I've got a Ghost Echo near the end. I'm very tempted to get an RM-1N as well because they look fun.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
TheOndrakGuy
committed
committed
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 10:13 am
Location: Wolverhampton, UK.
Contact:

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by TheOndrakGuy »

FREEVERB THE THREEVERB!
User avatar
WayToHip
experienced
experienced
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 11:33 pm
Location: Alberta, Canada

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by WayToHip »

Isn't your name echodeluxe? How could you not have three or more reverb pedals?
Tom Dalton wrote:"I want to be as big as I can if it's going to stop a bullet."
User avatar
sylnau
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10403
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:38 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by sylnau »

Why there's no Wattson reverb?
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." --John Cage

http://www.youtube.com/sylnau
User avatar
zeravla
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 942
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 3:18 pm
Location: Oak Cliff TX

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by zeravla »

My theory is that every fuzz should have a reverb before and after it. But also every reverb should have a fuzz before and after it. Into infinity.
The_Active_Conundrum
experienced
experienced
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:16 am
Location: Norse Carolina
Contact:

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by The_Active_Conundrum »

I only have two reverbs, like I'm new to this or something
Great dealings with: ryan summit, UncleGrandfather, Pizza, hbombgraphics, dangergirlstarship, Clockworker, kosta
User avatar
greyscales
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2101
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 7:07 pm
Location: Tampa
Contact:

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by greyscales »

resincum wrote:never enough verb
User avatar
brandnewzo
committed
committed
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:17 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by brandnewzo »

I have a Ghost Echo, RV-5, and a Digiverb on my board. Honestly, I felt a little silly wiring it all up, and was a little nervous of the comments I might get with 28% of my board being reverb pedals, but it honestly sounds great. It takes up just a hair bit more room that a BigSky and it was a lot cheaper too, so I don't feel bad about it at all.
Good deals with: deathmonkey, space6oy
User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by echodeluxe »

WayToHip wrote:Isn't your name echodeluxe? How could you not have three or more reverb pedals?
I have three delays.
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42256
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by Chankgeez »

I sense a Thr-Igor demo coming on. :D

Hello, friends. :hello:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by echodeluxe »

i dont know what youre talking about
User avatar
doommeow
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2021
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:37 pm

Re: three reverbs = overkill?

Post by doommeow »

DarkAxel wrote:
doommeow wrote:I'm running a RM-1N and a Cathedral on my main board, with the individual L/R channels of the EHX each in their own TB loop = so, basically verb x 3. The Reverb Machine is my main real verb (and so much fucking more), coming late in the chain. The Cathedral is used more as a texture and noise generator, the whole thing rigged so I can run it before dirt, after dirt, before AND after dirt simultaneous, simultaneous w/o dirt, etc....

THEN, in the loop of my Superego (once it's all patched correctly) are 2x Alesis Ineko units. Usually have at least one, if not both, on a verb patch.

And I'm still considering a second RM-1N....
can you send a pic of your pedalboard and maybe explain the switching system?

because that seems fucking amazing

Board is currently in disarray. In the middle of a rewire, trying to figure out if/how/where I'm fitting/using the 3 delays and ILFSS gift that I've gotten in the past 6 weeks. :facepalm:

But here's two pics from during the last rewire :
board beta 10 17 2014.jpg
board beta 10 17 2014.jpg (471.96 KiB) Viewed 699 times
IMG_4115.jpg
IMG_4115.jpg (472.98 KiB) Viewed 699 times


IIRC, my signal path at the time was:

Philo King > OC-2 > Octane clone > St :animal: Muff > SAS #1 > TB Loop #1 (so one side, lets say left, of the Cathedral) > Superego (with it's own mess of stuff in the loop, GB24, grstlzr, plus a Bitrman 2x Inekos and a 1/2 dozen other pedals on an entirely separate board patched in thru a blendable feedback loop) > Trimetal > SAS #2 > TB Loop #2 ( so the Right channel of the Cathedral) > Donner delay > RM-1N > Black Fountain > Echo Degrader > CT5 > DittoX2 > Killswitch > Amp (with it's own spring verb)....

So there's no complicated switching involved, not really, a couple of extra bypass loops. The trick is to place each channel of the Cathedral (or whatever stereo device you're using) in it's own TB loop. You can then turn on each channel/side independently, and place them at different points in your path.

Caveats-
- obviously, we're talking mono here. If you're running a stereo rig, disregard everything I've just said.
- Just because you're running the cathedral at two points in your path doesn't mean you suddenly have two pedals. You're still limited to running a single setting at a time.
- Unless you're looking for straight feedback, start with lower settings than you normally would. We're cascading, probably with gain stages in between. Runaways messes are likely.
Post Reply