D.o.S. wrote:You don't think someone who can do something that 99.99 repeating infinity of the population cannot doesn't deserve the trappings that come with it?
Is that a triple negative?? haha I had to read that a few times. But just because someone can do something that 99.99% of the population can't doesn't mean they deserve a great reward or whatever. Is that what you meant? I might be confused.
D.o.S. wrote: It really doesn't make a difference if you've won the genetic lottery for your intellect or for your athleticism, if you really think about it.
Even though there is a genetic influence in both, do you think athleticism is just as great of an attribute as intellect? I don't. I think intellect is a far better attribute to possess.
D.o.S. wrote:And, yes, a large portion of sports fans are troglodytes, but so are a large portion of fuzz lovers. Stupid doesn't cling to any color, creed, or passtime. 'Useful' is just as stupid a concept as any concept of sport that you might are to name, in the cosmic scheme of things anyway.
I agree with you that you can misuse anything to a point of redundancy or excess or in some negative way. I'm not so sure that useful is as stupid of a concept as sports. Maybe outside of a human perspective it could be.