BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

pedals fished from the shores of lake okanagan and flash frozen for freshness <drscientist.ca> <FB> <IG>

Moderator: Ryan

dapeegoo
uncommitted
uncommitted
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 11:29 am

BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by dapeegoo »

Has anybody compared the BitQuest Pitch effect vs a MicroPOG? How is the tracking? How are they different?
User avatar
bronzetalon
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:06 pm
Location: STL

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by bronzetalon »

BitQuest Pitch is less good
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4772
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by 01010111 »

Yeah, it has a bit more lag and isn't as stable as the POGs.
User avatar
bronzetalon
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:06 pm
Location: STL

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by bronzetalon »

But for single note stuff its fine.
digiTED
interested
interested
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 2:04 pm
Location: San Franciscotronic
Contact:

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by digiTED »

I need to do a side by side since I can.

Giant +1000 to BQ is that it's not octave only; maniacal chord voicing sound quite cool when I can dial them in well.
User avatar
Clean Channel
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:03 am
Location: Canada

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by Clean Channel »

digiTED wrote:Giant +1000 to BQ is that it's not octave only; maniacal chord voicing sound quite cool when I can dial them in well.


Well said. Another +1000 to BQ from me.
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4772
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by 01010111 »

Clean Channel wrote:
digiTED wrote:Giant +1000 to BQ is that it's not octave only; maniacal chord voicing sound quite cool when I can dial them in well.


Well said. Another +1000 to BQ from me.


That is a very good point! Being able to dial in exact pitches to make chords out of single notes easily makes the BQ infinitely better than the micro pog.
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by neonblack »

wfs1234 wrote:
Clean Channel wrote:
digiTED wrote:Giant +1000 to BQ is that it's not octave only; maniacal chord voicing sound quite cool when I can dial them in well.


Well said. Another +1000 to BQ from me.


That is a very good point! Being able to dial in exact pitches to make chords out of single notes easily makes the BQ infinitely better than the micro pog.


Wait. This is what I wanted a Pitch Bay for. So, I should just get this instead, right?
User avatar
goosekevin
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2236
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm
Location: NSW Australia

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by goosekevin »

neonblack wrote:
wfs1234 wrote:
Clean Channel wrote:
digiTED wrote:Giant +1000 to BQ is that it's not octave only; maniacal chord voicing sound quite cool when I can dial them in well.


Well said. Another +1000 to BQ from me.


That is a very good point! Being able to dial in exact pitches to make chords out of single notes easily makes the BQ infinitely better than the micro pog.


Wait. This is what I wanted a Pitch Bay for. So, I should just get this instead, right?



Yeah you'll get a lot more bang for your buck with the bq
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13508
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by goroth »

With the gain settings and everything you can basically get a pitch bay out of your bit quest. The tracking and octave sound will be pretty well the same as well, as both are based on the spin chip and as far as I know they are reading the pitch in the same way. Sounds that way in any case. Same thing with any Spin based pedal - Organizer, Rainbow thinger etc. POG tracks the pitch in another way and is better at it. But BQ is radder in all forms of the word.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
raulduke
interested
interested
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:51 am

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by raulduke »

The bitquest sounds good to me.

Pogs never get close to sounding like a 'real' twelve string to my ears, so the flexibility of the Bitquest wins.

Tuning the pitch shift up a 5th or 7th sounds brilliant too.

Oh... and did I mention it also does a load of other cool FX.

In short it's awesome :)
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13508
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by goroth »

raulduke wrote:The bitquest sounds good to me.

Pogs never get close to sounding like a 'real' twelve string to my ears, so the flexibility of the Bitquest wins.

Tuning the pitch shift up a 5th or 7th sounds brilliant too.

Oh... and did I mention it also does a load of other cool FX.

In short it's awesome :)

Yep, tuning to a fifth is great for video game tunes :D
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by neonblack »

I have a Second Voice that can do fifths but its analog so its kinda limited. Gnarly as shit though. I watched both of the long demos again last night and I am sold for sure.
User avatar
Ryan
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5277
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
Location: Ogopogo Valley
Contact:

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by Ryan »

dapeegoo wrote:Has anybody compared the BitQuest Pitch effect vs a MicroPOG? How is the tracking? How are they different?


Welcome to ILF! Great question, the two pedals use different processors and they don't have the same performance. The POG uses a much more powerful microprocessor and has a better pitch algorithm, the BitQuest is based on the Spin FV-1 and its pitch shifting is really more of a 'close enough for rock'n'roll' kinda effect. It takes a lot of processing power to do really accurate pitch shifting, have to be very fast and have a lot of memory, and the Spin isn't and doesn't.. the way you change the audio's frequency in the Spin results in a modulating sound, it's a warbly pitch shift, and certain notes you play will warble more if they're related timing wise to the algorithm's timing. Over all though, I'd say it sounds pretty good and tracks pretty well. I think if you played 7 Nation Army in front of a crowd they'd say 'yeah, ok, that's close enough'. :thumb:

It's also great for weird stuff though, like slight detuning for chorus sounds, and tuning chords, I love those sounds too.

Thanks for chiming in everybody, much appreciated!
User avatar
neonblack
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8090
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 12:00 am
Location: Wilmington, NC

Re: BitQuest Pitch vs MicroPOG tracking?

Post by neonblack »

Have you ever thought about an Epic Bitquest? Like the normal circuit but with an expansion so you could run two quests at once? Maybe not all of them, but certain ones that play well with others. Pitch shifting + bit crushing. Mmm. Ring mod + flanger. So many combinations! I would pay extra for an epic model. You could even slim down the expansion side somehow if it would make it less costly.

Alternatively, has anyone played with two of these at once?
Post Reply