Earthquaker Devices Palisades

walkerrn · Post by **walkerrn** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 12:34 am

As seen over at TPG

looks. awesome.

Chankgeez · Post by **Chankgeez** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:01 am

Does look awesome.

neonblack · Post by **neonblack** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:07 am

Is it a preamp?

backwardsvoyager · Post by **backwardsvoyager** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 6:24 am

wuuuuuuuuuuuut

retinal orbita · Post by **retinal orbita** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 8:56 am

This came up about 6000 times in my Tumblr feed yesterday. What is it? Also I want one?

Chankgeez · Post by **Chankgeez** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:19 am

Is "Bob Loblaw" Jamie's username on TGP? Because that's who posted this:

[QUOTE=Bob Loblaw;17747253]So this wasn't really ready to be seen yet :facepalm Some guys came by to check out the shop, snapped a photo and put it up on instagram without really knowing they shouldn't do that. We don't have anything written up for it yet and production hasn't even started. We'll have some info and videos up soon enough. It's not a multiband distortion but it is a very versatile version of something I said we would never do

[/QUOTE]

UnicornTrap · Post by **UnicornTrap** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 10:10 am

some kinda auto-wah/filter? I'm curious. They've been on a real roll lately coming up with new stuff

neonblack · Post by **neonblack** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:34 am

I'm definitely intrigued. It sure looks like a multiband distortion.

What did they say they would never do? If it wasn't for the lack of EQ, I would say preamp. Well, I already said preamp. Maybe the "voice" and "bandwidth" in conjunction with the tone acts as an eq? That doesn't seem as useful as just having eq controls. Hmm.

walkerrn · Post by **walkerrn** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:08 pm

neonblack wrote:I'm definitely intrigued. It sure looks like a multiband distortion.

What did they say they would never do? If it wasn't for the lack of EQ, I would say preamp. Well, I already said preamp. Maybe the "voice" and "bandwidth" in conjunction with the tone acts as an eq? That doesn't seem as useful as just having eq controls. Hmm.

Yeah trying to think what it could be, interesting it seems to have two gain stages (one always active) but only one tone control.
A type of EQ/preamp was the first thing i thought of too (akin to the empress paraeq w/boost, with a different take on the paraEQ stuff), the other was the WMD geiger counter which is so unwieldy a simplier idea would be brilliant.

fuzzg0d · Post by **fuzzg0d** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 3:45 pm

Tubescreamer

chuckjaywalk · Post by **chuckjaywalk** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 4:10 pm

I'm kinda hoping it is a bit crusher. It's not, but I can dream.

Jero · Post by **Jero** » Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:58 pm

klone

bobcunningham · Post by **bobcunningham** » Sat Apr 26, 2014 1:51 pm

What did they say they'd never make? A phaser wasn't it? Could the control knobs be in any way phaser related?

kbit · Post by **kbit** » Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:25 pm

bobcunningham wrote:What didthey say they'd never make? A phaser wasn't it? Could the control knobs be in any way phaser related?

They have a Phaser already. Grand Orbiter :thumb:

neonblack · Post by **neonblack** » Sat Apr 26, 2014 6:28 pm

It almost looks like it could be some kind of harmony synth fuzz type deal. Like a second voice maybe? But with an extra gain stage and a boost?

Its probably going to turn out to be something either really ridiculous or really mundane in a fancy box.

ilovefuzz.com

Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades

Re: Earthquaker Devices Palisades