I taught myself a certain amount - modes, scales, chords, so I know something but not a massive amount. Knowing more would be nothing other than a great thing. Shit, I'm lazy...

Moderator: Ghost Hip
mr. sound boy king wrote: Organic apples are not normal, they are special, like analog, whereas normal apples, like digital, taste sterile and lack warmth.
friendship wrote: y u h8 swoosh woosh
wfs1234 wrote:I've made several attempts to learn scales, chords, and theory with some success. What I've noticed is that, initially, the knowledge does make you more formulaic, but after that knowledge becomes natural you can do a lot more and find places for sounds you couldn't find before. It feels restrictive, but it's really enabling.
I struggled a lot with myself as to whether or not this new knowledge would help me or turn me into a "music sounds like this" snob. What I decided is the sounds and relationships between sounds I can hear have already been found, and the relationships between those sounds mapped out. So if you find a sound or a progression of sounds, and know music theory, you have an map of where all kinds of sounds can fit in. It's not that you're not doing something new, it's just that you better know how sounds relate to each other. If you want something jarring, you can find something jarring. If you want something placid and plain, you can find it. Music theory isn't restricting, it enables you to group sounds in ways that you may want but can't find so easily without music theory. The downside is, if you aren't creative or are lacking some kind of sound in your head to let out, knowing music theory will probably turn you into a "music sounds like this" snob.
orangeespoom wrote:if knowing theory makes you less creative chances are you weren't creative in the first place, and you lose at music.