Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
ChetMagongalo
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4393
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:22 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by ChetMagongalo »

limitations can be very good. usually I don't like options and more than EQ knob gets me stuck in tweak city
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyfalconX/videos
rustywire wrote:Post your battle jacket of wrong bands
psychic vampire. wrote:I believe all authorities should be destroyed?
User avatar
phantasmagorovich
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by phantasmagorovich »

^ reading this and your sig is kinda funny.

I love that paramtric EQ. Until now I have not gigged the pedal but I'm really looking forward to tailoring the sound to different venues.
And honestly I don't know why there aren't more pedals with this sort of eq. Skully told me he had some ideas about that though...
User avatar
rustywire
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4715
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:54 am
Location: on.

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by rustywire »

I like fuzz pedals without EQ in their circuit. The more direct the fuzz circuit is, the louder and crazier things get.
Ever hear the v5 and v6 Muffs w/tone bypass? They're nuts.

A separate EQ pedal or boost stacks perfectly for both boost/cut/filtering/attenuation.

Something like the Fromel Shape EQ, which is based on the Ibanez(Maxon) PQ-9. Low shelf, high shelf, mid shelf OR parametric mids from 75hz-5600hz.
Or Frostwave Resonator :rock:
[B/S/T shoutouts] Shortlist: Hollow Earth|Ct5|856|Condor|Thermae|OP-1|half track reel2reel|Prophet6 ... :whoa:
rfurtkamp wrote:The only transparent thing I own is a set of drinking glasses.
Image
User avatar
Ro_S
committed
committed
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 7:46 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by Ro_S »

Image
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13514
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by goroth »

I think it's just tradition. I can't find a logical reason as to why fuzz tends to be simple in terms of tonal controls, and distortion tends to have more.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

Definitely tradition rather than a legit reason. EQing before or after fuzz can change the sound in amazing ways and that's something more pedals should explore within themselves I think.

That said I prefer fuzz pedals with one tone control that are just RIGHT. Less time spent tweaking, more spent rocking out.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by bigchiefbc »

At the same time though, I often read people complaining about pedals with 4 knobs being too complicated and people wanting something simple. I don't know, I like having a lot of control, but then once I find a sound I like, I usually never change anything, and the knobs stay there for 3 years or so. So then I always feel like all that control is wasted. The only exception to that is shit like the Flanger Hoax, where the coolest thing about it is the constant tweaking.
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by D.o.S. »

goroth wrote:I think it's just tradition. I can't find a logical reason as to why fuzz tends to be simple in terms of tonal controls, and distortion tends to have more.
Because most fuzz circuits aren't designed to sound good with a whole bunch of changes to the EQ?

Because knobs are for wankers?

Because bitch I may be?
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
wafl
experienced
experienced
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 9:58 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by wafl »

Its probably because an eq that can boost and cut is more complicated than most fuzzes from a circuit design standpoint. Obviously not all fuzzes but most transistor fuzzes and muff based things.
Personally I love pre and post eq.
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42256
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by Chankgeez »

D.o.S. wrote: Because knobs are for wankers?
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Iommic Pope
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11400
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:41 pm
Location: Frimmin' on the Fram

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by Iommic Pope »

D.o.S. wrote: Because knobs are for wankers?
Image
WWPD?
fcknoise wrote:You are all fucking tryhard effort posting nerds
Invisible Man wrote: I'm probably the most humble person I know. I feel good about smelling my own butthole.
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Did you just assume Billy Corgan's dildo preference??
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13514
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by goroth »

As long as the controls make sense then more knobs = more better for me. You don't have to tweak em all the time just to prove that they're useful. I haven't touched the knobs on one of my Elements in at least 6 months, but I'd never have got the sound I like out of it without them (which is why I bought and sold like 20 distortions before finding the elements).
But I like to set and forget stuff. Doesn't matter if it is a 1 knob fuzz or a 15 knob monster, I'm not touching that shit during a gig. Too busy being metal, and too much risk for getting settings wrong.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
rfurtkamp
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5774
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 1:27 am
Location: Idaho
Contact:

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by rfurtkamp »

I already have parametric EQs on both channels of my preamp that the pedalboard goes into.

If I need to tweak more than that plus a dozen fuzzes, well, there's always the rest of the rack.

As far as why they aren't there, same reason that TC is making a fortune selling stuff to people that are afraid of choices: less knobs costs less and is an actual selling point for some ungodly reason to people.
==
My pedalboard costs approximately 191 Metal Zones.

Image
User avatar
Gone Fission
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4926
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:50 pm
Location: The ungovernable tribal regions southwest of D.C.
Contact:

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by Gone Fission »

Most early fuzz circuits are dead simple and primative. Throwing in make-up gain for a passive eq could basically double the complexity of the circuit. And often the circuits are playing around with impedence screwiness for tone and might not play well with eq or eq may not play well with the screwiness.

You want more control? Use a G&L-style bass control in combo with your tone control on your guitar, and add a passive Vari-Tone-type mid notch in your guitar or in a pedal first in your pedal order. Pre-gain tone shaping is incredibly powerful and effective. It's a big reason the pickup market is so huge, IMO--people are looking to tailor their pre-gain eq for their specific rig.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42256
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Fuzz pedals and their EQ limitations.

Post by Chankgeez »

wafl wrote: Personally I love pre and post eq.
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
Post Reply