new new new new new DOD?!?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by echodeluxe »

lookie what showed up on my bench today
Image
Image

pretty rad! I can't wait to get home after work and try em out through the Gemini.
User avatar
skullservant
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 16575
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by skullservant »

That sparkle paint job looks pretty ace. Hopefully they didn't do anything stupid to the inside
User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by echodeluxe »

they did go smd. which is not a bad thing. its all correct spec, the circuits are identical to the vintage ones. true bypass and all that jazz. when i get home ill let you know how they sound. i hope awesome.
User avatar
skullservant
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 16575
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:55 am

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by skullservant »

I hope so too! Curious of that phaser.
I can't even imagine how tiny a SMD 250 looks. It's not that many parts to begin with haha
User avatar
woolyh
committed
committed
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: UK

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by woolyh »

Surprised they went SMD, I thought they were going for the MXR Script vintage looking chunky components market ;p
Rock over London, rock on, Chicago.
User avatar
friendship
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4182
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:22 pm

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by friendship »

ill. Run that phasor into the overdrive and get galaxy
sound journal
actualidiot wrote:12-bit's almost analog, right?
User avatar
echodeluxe
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:27 pm

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by echodeluxe »

friendship wrote:ill. Run that phasor into the overdrive and get galaxy
into my gemini. to the moon.
User avatar
retinal orbita
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2899
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: I haven’t had a decent sandwich in thirteen years

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by retinal orbita »

Wow those look so cool. What a cute little phasor!! :love:
User avatar
leaves turn
experienced
experienced
Posts: 948
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by leaves turn »

Yeah I'm pretty psyched that DOD is back. We should be able to do some pretty cool stuff with it. :D
disclaimer: I'm an engineer with DigiTech/DOD
good deals
User avatar
retinal orbita
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2899
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 7:44 pm
Location: I haven’t had a decent sandwich in thirteen years

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by retinal orbita »

There's a guy selling a big box DOD 690 Chorus on CL that I want to buy.... I don't have $149 right now.....
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by 01010111 »

Mmmmmm DAT phasor! :love:
User avatar
friendship
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4182
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:22 pm

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by friendship »

is it basically a Phase 90?
sound journal
actualidiot wrote:12-bit's almost analog, right?
User avatar
woolyh
committed
committed
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: UK

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by woolyh »

Phase 45 IIRC.
Rock over London, rock on, Chicago.
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by 01010111 »

It's basically a phase 45. All the DOD phasers are based on mxr ones except for the 490 which is a tweaked small stone with a huge sweep.
hiorgos
experienced
experienced
Posts: 636
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 10:54 am
Location: ...

Re: new new new new new DOD?!?

Post by hiorgos »

...
Last edited by hiorgos on Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply