Fender Blender.

[less_cunning]

LOL.

[Bellyheart]

Tom make a fuzz with an eq after the circuit but in the same enclosure.

[Blurillaz]

Tom make a fuzz with an eq after the circuit but in the same enclosure.

This.
Or just PM him and custom order one.

[darryl2113]

I'm not sure what you are talking about with the blender not having any volume. It(the RI and the v1's) has a tone boost that also boosts the overall volume as well, and with that switch engaged, it is literally one of the loudest pedals out there (amongst other newer contenders). Without the boost engaged, it is very dark, scooped and barely hits unity gain, agreed. But I just don't use that mode when I use it. It DOES NOT like humbuckers very much, ime. It doesn't like an input signal with alot of top end either (I usually roll my tone knob back a little). Its basicly an octavia style pedal with less mids, way more bass and treble, and a fuck ton of gainy compression on tap. Its one of those pedals that you don't just step on. You actually play the pedal( you have to adapt your technique to get the right tones out of it (playing close to the neck and playing softly, the harder you pick the more compressed it gets). some players know how to adjust their touch to them, some just can't quite grasp that concept. I will say that it really isn't that identifiable in very many SP or MBV songs, you won't be playing this pedal and have a "so thats how they got that sound!" moment, at least not the way you would with a Big Muff or Rat. I have the reissue and am very happy with it (got it off ebay for 80 bucks from someone who didn't mesh well with it). I will say this though, don't buy this one thinking you are gonna cop all those great Pumpkins or Valentine's tones, if I had to guess, billy only used it on 2 or 3 solos in the entire pumpkins catalog, and Kevin used it on 2 songs off of Isn't Anything . But I use the fuck out of it for lead playing on recordings and occasional fuck with people's heads live. Good pedal if you can get it for under 100 bucks imo.

[Bratcher]

would the Ampeg Scrambler better to get? or an Ampeg Scrambler clone???

anyway. this thread was implusive TOM DELETE THREAD.

Chord is not a word the Scrambler can understand.

Guitar is not a word the scrambler can understand.

[less_cunning]

hmmm. i guess the Ampeg Scrambler is better for bass? right???

[Bellyheart]

The only thing I really liked about the Blender was when you do dive-bombs or dissonant chords it's really fucking ugly, but it sounds different throughout the bend. Not going to pay that much to use the dysfunctional part of a pedal. Not yet at least.

[1,2,3, Pull Out!]

hmmm. i guess the Ampeg Scrambler is better for bass? right???

True.

[smile_man]

hmmm. i guess the Ampeg Scrambler is better for bass? right???

True.

double true.

[less_cunning]

DE: Absolutely. The Big Muff and Fender Blender were two pedals that sonically had a lot of influence on my fuzz designs. Mind you, I've never based any of my designs electronically on those pedals, but when I am designing, I'm always keeping my ear out to replicate (or even out do!) my favorite fuzz tones. For instance, one of the great things about the Fender Blender is how noisy it is. A lot of boutique pedal builders these days try to cut out noise and hiss from their effects, shaping the distortion sound to be "perfect". Personally, I think you lose a ton of character and possibility with guitar tone if you are afraid to let the circuit be a little wild. My most chaotic pedal (and Fender Blender-like… and then some) is the Destructo Noctavia, and the bad girl wails like a banshee the moment you turn it on, forcing you to really play your guitar!

[Bellyheart]

Anyone know anything about the EHX Graphic Fuzz?

[less_cunning]

Anyone know anything about the EHX Graphic Fuzz?

i was trying to get one of those on craigslist in a trade for my cheap acoustic guitar this summer but the deal fell thru. never got to test it but i guess really they should have called it Graphic Overdrive.

IDK i just really needed an EQ pedal.