HM2 vs HM3

[Moustache_Bash]

What is? I don't know.

[htsamurai]

uh hm2 is, I believe fly? and hm3 is surf I think, not sure though, it's been a few years

[crayola64]

uh hm2 is, I believe fly? and hm3 is surf I think, not sure though, it's been a few years

I believe you are correct

[Achtane]

Guys.
I'm confused.
And probably dumb.

[pelliott]

uh hm2 is, I believe fly? and hm3 is surf I think, not sure though, it's been a few years

Nailed it.

[Moustache_Bash]

Haha, this thread is ridiculous.

[pelliott]

It's super effective.

[Moustache_Bash]

Some people on the internetz claim they're pretty much the same. BUT when I watch Kayzer's demos, it sounds like the 2 is more crunchy/mids whereas the 3 sounds more scooped/gainier.

[Officer Bukowski]

hahaha yess

[erector]

It's super effective.

I was all until this post, and then I was all

[Bon Hoga]

If this is about Boss pedals, they're both great for low gain, while the HM3 is actually useful for higher gain applications as well.

[Boxbie]

If this is about Boss pedals, they're both great for low gain, while the HM3 is actually useful for higher gain applications as well.

There's some crystal lettuce on that cats head.

[bigchiefbc]

I'm totally confused now. I have no idea what 3/4s of the posts are referring to.

As to the title, I was assuming this is about the Boss heavy metal pedals.

The HM2 is more of a grindy fuzzy distortion, and the HM3 is a little more scooped and compressed and "METULZ". The HM-2 is superior in my experience, unless you want to do a lot of chugga chugga stuff.

[Achtane]

OH YOU CLEVER BASTARD
HOHOHOHOHO

[htsamurai]

welp looks like at least 2 people got what I was saying