Lil' Looper

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
Bellyheart
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5791
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Richmond, Va

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by Bellyheart »

Yahtzee...welcome
User avatar
Muse FTW
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1753
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:44 pm

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by Muse FTW »

If only it had reverse...
User avatar
penelope tree
committed
committed
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by penelope tree »

Has anyone tried one yet?
User avatar
stripes
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1247
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 11:52 am
Location: NY

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by stripes »

Lil' Looper just sounds like a porn name to me or something...
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by 01010111 »

Yup, it does what it does ok. But I'd advise looking elsewhere for your looping needs.
User avatar
penelope tree
committed
committed
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by penelope tree »

wfs1234 wrote:Yup, it does what it does ok. But I'd advise looking elsewhere for your looping needs.


Why is that? Poor audio quality? Awkward controls?
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by 01010111 »

penelope tree wrote:
wfs1234 wrote:Yup, it does what it does ok. But I'd advise looking elsewhere for your looping needs.


Why is that? Poor audio quality? Awkward controls?


In short: it has way too many little quirks to get around.

The bypass is bad, and gets exponentially worse if you have other buffers in our chain (and the effects are horrible). The undo function is confusingly hard to use. The starting and stopping of the loops is really weird, in a way that should probably be demonstrated to be understood. The metronome is awful, and the lights always flash to some otherworldly rhythm that I have yet to interpret, other than when it flashes red it's the start of the loop. And the effects only affect the input signal.

Good things: you can do polyrhythms (it's tricky but possible). The loop automatically plays back at the input level (this is incredibly convenient). You can start and stop two loops (not at the exact same time though...like I said, quirks). No submenus or hidden features.

If you can afford it get something better, but this thing will do what it advertises if you coax it juuuust right.
User avatar
penelope tree
committed
committed
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by penelope tree »

wfs1234 wrote:
penelope tree wrote:
wfs1234 wrote:Yup, it does what it does ok. But I'd advise looking elsewhere for your looping needs.


Why is that? Poor audio quality? Awkward controls?


In short: it has way too many little quirks to get around.

The bypass is bad, and gets exponentially worse if you have other buffers in our chain (and the effects are horrible). The undo function is confusingly hard to use. The starting and stopping of the loops is really weird, in a way that should probably be demonstrated to be understood. The metronome is awful, and the lights always flash to some otherworldly rhythm that I have yet to interpret, other than when it flashes red it's the start of the loop. And the effects only affect the input signal.

Good things: you can do polyrhythms (it's tricky but possible). The loop automatically plays back at the input level (this is incredibly convenient). You can start and stop two loops (not at the exact same time though...like I said, quirks). No submenus or hidden features.

If you can afford it get something better, but this thing will do what it advertises if you coax it juuuust right.


So it's not quite the bargain that people initially thought. .I don't care much about the effects or metronome but I like the idea of polyrhythmic loops and I don't want something too big. What would the other options be?
User avatar
madmax1012
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by madmax1012 »

I'm interested to. I want to keep my looping compact, or I'd just buy a DL4. I was thinking a digitech? they seem to get decent reviews and have a decent price point me thinks.
Fuzzy Fred wrote: please excuse me. can we keep this discussion civil and about donkey fucking?
hbombgraphics wrote:Why does it have to be Digital, but with an analog soul and buffalo semen???
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by 01010111 »

I don't really know of a way to keep it compact. The boss rc 30 can do multiple loops, from what I've read it's tricky if you have just the looper; if you have the extra footswitch you can do it pretty easy. But I don't of a way to keep it simple. There are other options but they just get bigger.

I thought about getting two rc-2's on the cheap, it might be tricky to get them synced up right but it would work (one thing no one complains about those things is that weird high-frequency buzz that's always on them; it's probably just my weird dog-range hearing but still).

For what it's worth I'm not looking to upgrade from the lil' looper, even with its idiosyncrasies. Because it's very straightforward when it comes to basic operation, turning off the loop at almost the same time is close enough for me (you just have to be fast with the footwork), and I don't care at all about the effects. The other things are small enough that they have just become second nature for me. Also the buttons are big enough I don't ever actually have to bend over to push them, but far enough from the pedals that I don't push them on accident. I can just push with the tip of my shoe and it works.
User avatar
penelope tree
committed
committed
Posts: 444
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by penelope tree »

Is the Vox's sound quality okay? I suppose the alternative for me might be something like the Jam Man Solo but I would prefer to have the capacity for two loops.
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: Lil' Looper

Post by 01010111 »

The loop sound quality's pretty good. I looped a drone thing I had going (eau claire thunder feedback on>ddmmtt>mini gnome) and once it was looped the difference between the loop signal and the original was really small. I had to really listen close to hear it.

That's part of the reason I'm keeping it, plus it's small and it's no trouble getting the second loop in time with the first.
Post Reply