Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Your band, other bands, singers, songwriters, more.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by D.o.S. »

Aw man, this makes me le sad:

In March, former Kyuss members Josh Homme and Scott Reeder filed a federal lawsuit against ex-bandmates John Garcia and Brant Bjork over their involvement in the band Kyuss Lives!, alleging "trademark infringement and consumer fraud."


There's an RS interview with Brant & John--which is obviously biased, but depressing none-the-less.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/ ... t-20120521
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
aen
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4363
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by aen »

JOsh Homme has always seemed like a gigantic prick to me. Judging by youtube videos, live experiences, and show reports from trusted friends. He's pretty sure he's the god of rock and roll and should be worshipped as such. Fuck him.
Chankgeez wrote:
DWARFCRAFT: We are not fucking around this year.
User avatar
Joe Gress
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2770
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:40 pm
Location: Pueblo Colorado

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by Joe Gress »

Ilike Qotsa more than Kyuss, but this fucking blows. Josh needs to calm his ego down.
awesome signature with witty quotes from all you fuckers :)
User avatar
Ancient Astronaught
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7202
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: Bear Country

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by Ancient Astronaught »

Hmmm I can see both sides of the story unfortunately because I've experienced similar problems in bands before. Yes Josh has a huge ego, but at the same time their blatantly trying to use the name Kyuss while trying to avoid legal problems by simply adding Lives! at the end but still playing Kyuss song's... Josh is handling everything in a perfectly legal fashion while they are trying to find loopholes to allow it to exist, so which one is worse?? The person with the huge ego that handles everything legally, or the one's who can't handle that their own solo careers failed so they reunited their old band through loopholes in the legal system regarding names? Jealousy is at the center of this problem, from both sides, unfortunately Josh will probably win due to their blatant use of loopholes, if they play live any of the song's that Josh has writers credit for, they've doomed themselves unfortunately.

I now in any band that I'm in, establish what I am in that band and what my responsibilities for, but I also value my intellectual property (much like Josh). I was recently in a band where two friends of mine started jamming (bass and drums) who then asked me to come in and fill out the band on guitar and vocals. When I joined they didnt have one full song written yet, no band name, nothing but the partial structure of one song. I came in, wrote 5 more songs in 2 months, came up with a band name, came up with the ideaology behind the band, created all the artwork, wrote all the lyrics and turned the 3 of us into an official Band. At the same time I copyrighted the band name to myself to protect my intellectual property, because I knew ego's would eventually conflict. And it did, the classic 3 chiefs and no indians. I won't go into specifics but when it came time to end the band I took the name with me, there's no way i'm letting someone else come in and take everything that i came up with and all the time i put into the band and everything behind it and run with it. I cover my ass, and I don't blame Josh for doing the same, they shouldn't be mad at him for doing so because they should have done it themselves as well. /rant
Iommic Pope wrote: Skip, you rule. You hate people so much, you're willing to discredit all human progress, its awesome.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

This sucks, I love Kyuss, it's a shame to see them fighting like this. I can understand Josh and Scott wanting to get paid royalties for songs they wrote or whatever, that's just fair, but I think the accusation of consumer fraud is total bullshit, nobody thinks it includes JHo and they've always presented it as not including the full old lineup. Plus, and I know this isn't necessarily relevant, but doesn't Josh Homme have plenty of money already? Seems like he could let them do it.

It's sad to see cool music getting shut down because of legal crap, even if the suit is legally sound, I'm definitely going to see Kyuss Lives if they come back around my way in the future.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
Ancient Astronaught
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7202
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: Bear Country

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by Ancient Astronaught »

I completely agree the consumer fraud claim is bullshit, monkeydancer is correct they never marketed it as Kyuss reunited, but mainly as a tribute band. Yes Josh does have enough money, but welcome to capitalist America..... :picard:
Iommic Pope wrote: Skip, you rule. You hate people so much, you're willing to discredit all human progress, its awesome.
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by D.o.S. »

I'm pretty sure the crux of the matter comes down to Scott & Josh wanting their cut of whatever KL! makes without having to actually be in the band.

And, obviously, the Brant/Josh scowlfest has been going on for a while. See: Whitewater.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROCDGwKAXtc[/youtube]
Why can't we all just bob our heads in peace?
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
madmax1012
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2758
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:35 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by madmax1012 »

aen wrote:JOsh Homme has always seemed like a gigantic prick to me. Judging by youtube videos, live experiences, and show reports from trusted friends. He's pretty sure he's the god of rock and roll and should be worshipped as such. Fuck him.



THIS.
Fuzzy Fred wrote: please excuse me. can we keep this discussion civil and about donkey fucking?
hbombgraphics wrote:Why does it have to be Digital, but with an analog soul and buffalo semen???
User avatar
theavondon
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 10742
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by theavondon »

I mean, Kyuss without Homme and Reeder isn't really Kyuss to me anyway. Plus, it's pretty shady. And, Nick Oliveri being in the band just ensured me never wanting to see them.
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

theavondon wrote:I mean, Kyuss without Homme and Reeder isn't really Kyuss to me anyway.

What about the first 2 albums? Although admittedly Wretch isn't that great, Blues for the Red Sun is awesome.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
MaggotBrainNY
committed
committed
Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Location: Albany, NY
Contact:

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by MaggotBrainNY »

How is Scott Reeder going to play shows with them (and get paid to do it), then turn around and get involved in a lawsuit?

THAT is some bullshit.

And yes, while I do like QOTSA a lot, I would agree with Aen, that Homme seems like an egotistical prick, so his role in this is not entirely surprising.
User avatar
theavondon
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 10742
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by theavondon »

monkeydancer wrote:
theavondon wrote:I mean, Kyuss without Homme and Reeder isn't really Kyuss to me anyway.

What about the first 2 albums? Although admittedly Wretch isn't that great, Blues for the Red Sun is awesome.

I mean, by the time blues came out, they had already kicked nick out.
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
User avatar
univalve
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 6143
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:01 pm
Contact:

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by univalve »

Ancient Astronaught wrote:... if they play live any of the song's that Josh has writers credit for, they've doomed themselves unfortunately.

i have to disagree based on the (german) law: they are a tribute (=cover) band. If they play over here lives shows in Germany they have to pay royalities for each cover song. So Josh gets his money for the songs he wrote. I don't think that Josh has a money problem here. It has to be sth. different why he started that legal offense.
So not doomed - just a stinky cover band :p
monkeydancer wrote:
theavondon wrote:I mean, Kyuss without Homme and Reeder isn't really Kyuss to me anyway.

What about the first 2 albums? Although admittedly Wretch isn't that great, Blues for the Red Sun is awesome.

I think Wretch is pretty good ("god damn son of a bitch!" :lol: ). Underrated album. But i love all of their albums. I hope this shit comes not to my mind when i listen the next time to it.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

Don't get me wrong, I quite like Wretch, but for me it's just nowhere near their other albums, which I love. And while they had kicked nick out before releasing blues, he did play on it! Pretty well too, the bass on that album is sweet.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
Ancient Astronaught
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7202
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:14 pm
Location: Bear Country

Re: Kyuss vs. Kyuss...

Post by Ancient Astronaught »

univalve wrote:
Ancient Astronaught wrote:... if they play live any of the song's that Josh has writers credit for, they've doomed themselves unfortunately.

i have to disagree based on the (german) law: they are a tribute (=cover) band. If they play over here lives shows in Germany they have to pay royalities for each cover song. So Josh gets his money for the songs he wrote. I don't think that Josh has a money problem here. It has to be sth. different why he started that legal offense.
So not doomed - just a stinky cover band :p


I'm not versed on international laws but in America if they've been playing "his" songs live to sold out shows since Kyuss Lives! formed without his permission and without paying him royalties, then he has a really strong case to have them shut down unfortunately, as any tribute band if you make enough money to make the original band feel as if they are missing out on money that is due to them and make it worth their while to pay their lawyer bills. I think that this whole thing started because they were not paying him and are basically trying to say they shouldnt have to because he "screwed them over" by copyrighting everything after Kyuss broke up. If Josh got into publishing in 92 and they broke up in 95 they had 3 years to learn from his knowledge and cover their asses as well, but they didnt, they just let it all go and he seized the opportunity. If I had been telling my band for 3 years to claim their publishing rights, and they ignored me and then the band broke up, why wouldnt i go after atleast my portion of them? and if they arent going to claim their share for 15 years afterwards, his portion for those 15 years is all of it, and at that point they basically lose their right to claim any of it because they waited so long. Music law in america is really weird and screwy like that.
Iommic Pope wrote: Skip, you rule. You hate people so much, you're willing to discredit all human progress, its awesome.
Post Reply