A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Your band, other bands, singers, songwriters, more.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
androidpopjr
committed
committed
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:11 am
Location: Austin, tx

A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by androidpopjr »

User avatar
Ghost Hip
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 am
Location: Detroit

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Ghost Hip »

I like shoegaze, i like punk, i think grunge is a bit silly, and alternative and indie are too general.

done.
Youtube Channel?
mr. sound boy king wrote: Organic apples are not normal, they are special, like analog, whereas normal apples, like digital, taste sterile and lack warmth.
friendship wrote: y u h8 swoosh woosh
User avatar
veteransdaypoppy
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:17 am

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by veteransdaypoppy »

happy 2k posts, pp.
well i guess, but i just don't know.

dollys
User avatar
androidpopjr
committed
committed
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:11 am
Location: Austin, tx

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by androidpopjr »

PumpkinPieces wrote:I like shoegaze, i like punk, i think grunge is a bit silly, and alternative and indie are too general.

done.


I mean it's all just rock n' roll... But I don't know why they would hate being labeled shoegaze. :idk:
User avatar
Wizard
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:50 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Wizard »

How about we all argue semantics while looking at Kevin Shields' pedal board(s).
I've got a fuzzbox and i'm not afraid to use it
jrmy wrote:And unlike the rest of the country, we recognize Sarcasm as a crucial building block of spoken language. Kind of like umami in cooking.
User avatar
androidpopjr
committed
committed
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 3:11 am
Location: Austin, tx

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by androidpopjr »

Wizard wrote:How about we all argue semantics while looking at Kevin Shields' pedal board(s).


haha nice
User avatar
sev
committed
committed
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:16 am
Location: Cyberspace

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by sev »

It's just like any other label. They are perpetuated by various facets of the music business in order to lump together and sell.

Remember "grunge"?

Does Nirvana sound like Soundgarden?
Does Pearl Jam sound like Alice In Chains?
Does Alice In Chains sound like Nirvana?
Does Soundgarden sound like Pearl Jam?

No, no, no, and no.
But they're all "grunge" huh?
:picard:
WILL DRUM FOR FOOD
User avatar
Wizard
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:50 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Wizard »

sev wrote:It's just like any other label. They are perpetuated by various facets of the music business in order to lump together and sell.

Remember "grunge"?

Does Nirvana sound like Soundgarden?
Does Pearl Jam sound like Alice In Chains?
Does Alice In Chains sound like Nirvana?
Does Soundgarden sound like Pearl Jam?

No, no, no, and no.
But they're all "grunge" huh?
:picard:


they all wear flannel. that means they're grundge. oh, i guess that means you can count pavement in too.
I've got a fuzzbox and i'm not afraid to use it
jrmy wrote:And unlike the rest of the country, we recognize Sarcasm as a crucial building block of spoken language. Kind of like umami in cooking.
Roseweave

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Roseweave »

I hate when people try to remove labels altogether. When I feel like getting into a new band, I'll use one or two genres as adjectives. Take them away and it makes it a lot harder to describe the kind of music I like. I don't think this is particularly "Progressive". I think a lot of big studio execs have a vested interest in getting rid of them so everything can become pop rock, to be honest.
User avatar
Enoch-Fox
involved
involved
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 1:10 am

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Enoch-Fox »

"Shoegaze" is one of the least uniform genre labels I've come across (although the despicable use of "indie" as a genre tag needs to cease) but even so there are usually elements that tie the bands together. Bands within genre tags aren't intended to sound IDENTICAL... it's just a touchstone, a hint. People should quit throwing a fit about it.

Also, if listeners are using a tag, it doesn't matter what bands or 'zine writers think about it. This guy can plead as much as he likes for people to stop saying "shoegaze" but it won't happen, the term has entered the vernacular.
User avatar
Mel x
committed
committed
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:20 pm

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Mel x »

androidpopjr wrote:
PumpkinPieces wrote:I like shoegaze, i like punk, i think grunge is a bit silly, and alternative and indie are too general.

done.


I mean it's all just rock n' roll... But I don't know why they would hate being labeled shoegaze. :idk:


because it was coined and used as a negative by the British music press, back then it wasn't a 'genre of music' it was usually used to describe a band that were boring to watch..... The only time you'd hear it used was in a negative context "yeah I'd like loop if they weren't such a bunch of shoegazers" or "I fucking hate shoegazers" it wasn't something to aspire to or call yourself. It was an insult. I have no idea when or how that changed around, it seems to me it was picked up retrospectivally in the US, to describe most of the late 80's early 90's British Indie bands. But people don't really use it here in the UK.
User avatar
Wizard
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1579
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:50 am
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: A Interesting Article I Came Across On Shoegaze

Post by Wizard »

Mel x wrote:because it was coined and used as a negative by the British music press, back then it wasn't a 'genre of music' it was usually used to describe a band that were boring to watch..... The only time you'd hear it used was in a negative context "yeah I'd like loop if they weren't such a bunch of shoegazers" or "I fucking hate shoegazers" it wasn't something to aspire to or call yourself. It was an insult. I have no idea when or how that changed around, it seems to me it was picked up retrospectivally in the US, to describe most of the late 80's early 90's British Indie bands. But people don't really use it here in the UK.


The british have this wonderful habit of doing that... in the late 70's when the TVP's came out and jangle pop made babies with the DIY aesthetic you had this new sort of punky-shambly-jangley sound that was all about expressing feelings and sharing the tapes you made in your bedrooms and being normal and un-punk. Well all that haters called it "twee" the way babies were said to pronounce sweet. It was an insult.. Again. But, the "twee" pop kids embraced it and threw it in their faces. Now and then they proudly referred to themselves as it. Not to mention the fact that MBV was at one point considered "twee" due to thier fuzzy jangly adorable sweet sound and lyrics a la Sunny Sundae Smile and Ecstasy and Strawberry Wine and This Is The New Record.... :lol:
I've got a fuzzbox and i'm not afraid to use it
jrmy wrote:And unlike the rest of the country, we recognize Sarcasm as a crucial building block of spoken language. Kind of like umami in cooking.
Post Reply