Achtane wrote:FUZZ ALL DAY MAN FUZZ IS GOD ALL OTHER EFFECTS ARE SHIT
Caesar wrote:Dude, can you get the fuck out of my b/s/t thread with your bullshit.
PumpkinPieces wrote: This isn't America, this is I Love Fuzz.
Mudfuzz wrote:Remember when we were all just a bunch of weirdos that liked fucked up shit and not just a bunch of nerds buying bling to impress each other online?
Yeah... but isn't it too old to resurrect it? Meh... probably not But- isn't it for people with.. like... ya' know... actually "good" semi hollows Meh.. screw it! thanks for the link
behndy wrote:why does all this talk about tube bass amps make we want to drop a bunch of coin on one WHEN I'M THE HAPPIEST I'VE EVER BEEN WITH MY TOANZ?
Tubes look cool = yr toans...look...cool..er.
fucking YES. all the excuse i NEED.
........... actually just made some horribly awful noises with my 1x12 SS power amp home rig........ so fuck that. but DAYUM those toobies are enticing.
WHY??!?
Eric! wrote:YOU'RE like having two pedals in one
with your...momentary fuck switch and all..
man. that? with bass cabs for Robo Ballz? give some guitarist that knows how not to be a wanky bitch but still needs his ego stroked the head full of cabs? and an assssss full of drummmmmer.
GIMME.
Eric! wrote:YOU'RE like having two pedals in one
with your...momentary fuck switch and all..
I don't get why anyone buys those cheap quite/flame veneer top guitars that Schecter, ESP, etc put out. Can they not see how flat the grain looks? Then again, I hate exotic tops in general, and I don't get why people would waste that wood on a guitar when it would make excellent furniture.
I don't get why companies like Fender and Gibson can't make $500 guitars in the USA. Seagul makes cheap acoustic guitars in Canada! And I think Godin (Seagul's parent company) are all made in Canada. It really seems like an American company could do it too.
I don't get why anyone would want a 1 pickup w/ volume guitar. I get simplicity, but there are -so- many sounds you're missing out on. A couple of pickups and a few switches, and you could get most sounds out of 1 guitar.
I don't get why there don't seem to be any semi-scientific experiments on the effects of body/neck wood on the sound of an electric guitar. I just don't buy the whole "resonating certain frequencies" thing. I think some woods just absorb more vibrations, and the higher frequencies are the first to go.
McSpunckle wrote:I don't get why anyone buys those cheap quite/flame veneer top guitars that Schecter, ESP, etc put out. Can they not see how flat the grain looks? Then again, I hate exotic tops in general, and I don't get why people would waste that wood on a guitar when it would make excellent furniture.
I don't get why companies like Fender and Gibson can't make $500 guitars in the USA. Seagul makes cheap acoustic guitars in Canada! And I think Godin (Seagul's parent company) are all made in Canada. It really seems like an American company could do it too.
I don't get why there don't seem to be any semi-scientific experiments on the effects of body/neck wood on the sound of an electric guitar. I just don't buy the whole "resonating certain frequencies" thing. I think some woods just absorb more vibrations, and the higher frequencies are the first to go.
i think Godin uses a lot of Canada-sourced materials, which keeps their costs down.
you can to some extent look at the accumulated observational data of guitarists as semi-scientific observation showing that, e.g., ash is much brighter and snappier than alder for Fender-type guitars, and alder is brighter and sustains better than basswood. mahogany slabs tend to be boomy on the neck PU and sustain for a week; a maple cap chokes down the boominess but keeps the sustain. etc. It's just not quantified.
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
FIFTY YEARS OF SCARING THE CHILDREN 1970-2020--and i'm not done yet
why does everybody play dreadnought-sized acoustic guitars when they're ill-suited for so many styles of music?
and why do all acoustic guitars' built-in PUs have to have that awful fucking hole in the side of the guitar for the install? hello? low-profile pots on the edge of the soundhole?
and WHY, WHY, WHY does everyone reissue guitars that originally had the Junior-style combination bridge-tailpiece with a fucking Tunomatic and stop tailpiece? it just ain't right.
Last edited by dubkitty on Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
FIFTY YEARS OF SCARING THE CHILDREN 1970-2020--and i'm not done yet
dubkitty wrote:you can to some extent look at the accumulated observational data of guitarists as semi-scientific observation showing that, e.g., ash is much brighter and snappier than alder for Fender-type guitars, and alder is brighter and sustains better than basswood. mahogany slabs tend to be boomy on the neck PU and sustain for a week; a maple cap chokes down the boominess but keeps the sustain. etc. It's just not quantified.
And that surely matters when you run your signal through a 8m long efx chain...