Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Officer Bukowski
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 9:13 pm

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by Officer Bukowski »

The white spider sounds pretty sweet. I'm a sucker for the oscillation switch.

Univalve I've noticed it doesn't dominate the mix by any means but it's not nearly as bad as a muff IMO. I think it works for my band because it's bright and loud. Also running my fuck od after it seems to help. Even if it totally sucked in a band I'd have to keep it for recording and playing at home though.

Behndy I guess I ask that but really I'm just wondering if it would sound good in general. It seems like just about all pedals are made for guitar in the first place. We are kinda spoiled.
I make pedals. SHARK TANK
User avatar
01010111
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4789
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:48 pm
Location: Frogtown

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by 01010111 »

behndy wrote:huurrrrrrrrrrrrm. 'kay. i'm gonna admit it. i get jealous of y'all Thin Stringeded Brethren having so many damn options on pedals. there ARE an amazing amount of options for bassists now in the Land Of Signal Destruction....... but still. only Devi i ever liked a lot was the Super Massive Black Hole.

doooooooooooo y'all ever think "is that going to be any good on guitar?" when you see effects pedz that are interesting?

and yah. Silver Rose is the first thing i've seen of hers for awhile that i got hard over. well, that and the Heaven's Gate. meeeeeeeeeeOW.


Yeah, whenever I see stuff that's tailored specifically for an instrument that's not the guitar I wonder how it would sound with a gutar running into it. Usually the mxr bass pedals :drool: But yeah I can feel for ya, i played bass for a long time until decided that I needed an instrument with a wider range. But those bass tones still call to me.

The dod bass flanger I tried on guitar didn't work out, the center frequency or the flange was too low so it sounded like it was only sweeping below the signal and not above. I always wanted to try the supermassive black hole on guitar but never had the chance, isn't that a mountainking electronics circuit, though?
User avatar
behndy
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19883
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Cali. East Bay Yo.
Contact:

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by behndy »

moar range? MOAR STRIIIIIIIIIINGS!!!!!
Eric! wrote:YOU'RE like having two pedals in one
with your...momentary fuck switch and all..
theactionindex wrote:QUADRACOCK BEHNDERFUCK
music, videos, in progress - http://www.youtube.com/c/behndy

okay, Plan B - PANICImage
User avatar
Jero
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11288
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:12 am
Location: here

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by Jero »

wfs1234 wrote: I always wanted to try the supermassive black hole on guitar but never had the chance, isn't that a mountainking electronics circuit, though?

Yeap! You can get the decked out version from mountainking...it's called the Magnetar.
I make noise toys under Stomping Stones
[url=http://www.stompingstones.com[/url]
oldangelmidnight wrote:This is the classic ILF I love. Emotional highs and lows. Scooped mids in my heart all day long.
User avatar
CaptainWampum
experienced
experienced
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by CaptainWampum »

univalve wrote:i had a tp and white spider. i really liked the sound by itself but both were not cutting through the mix with the band. :idk:


This is weird to me. I played in a 7 piece with two other guitarists and the TP helped me really really cut through.
User avatar
masked elwood
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1237
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by masked elwood »

i have the old E13 torn's peaker plus. i use the fuk outta it while recording but i can't use it through my live rig due it having wayyyyyyyyy too much high end that i can't get rid of. but that's just because of the way i run things on me live rig and has little to do with the pedal.
i've used it so much that i had to put it away for awhile.........so this reminds me that i need to bust it out again.. :hug:
Image
User avatar
grindonomicon
experienced
experienced
Posts: 985
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 11:46 am
Location: middle of nowhere, WI
Contact:

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by grindonomicon »

Does the stand alone TP pedal sound 'better' than as half of a Shoegazer? Cuz I didn't like it in the 'Gazer I had. Couldn't dial in any of those cranky amp sounds or sweet velcro low-gain fuzz.

My Seppuku Octave Drone kicks the Shoegazer I had to the curb and down the sewer.
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by bigchiefbc »

I had a TP for a while, but I honestly prefer the Aenima. I think there's only like 1 component different between them, but the Ae just felt like it had more bawlz, ya know? Similar sound, more bawlz.
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
Astricii
experienced
experienced
Posts: 868
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:27 pm
Location: Denver CO
Contact:

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by Astricii »

grindonomicon wrote:Does the stand alone TP pedal sound 'better' than as half of a Shoegazer? Cuz I didn't like it in the 'Gazer I had. Couldn't dial in any of those cranky amp sounds or sweet velcro low-gain fuzz.

My Seppuku Octave Drone kicks the Shoegazer I had to the curb and down the sewer.



Did you adjust your guitars tone and volume settings? That's a big part of it.

If you were running it after a buffered pedal that would kill it for you too. Buffers/active pickups change the make up of your signal and I notice you can't really get volume knob clean up with a buffer before a fuzz.
Achtane wrote:The whole super-submissive robotic dying cat girl with mosaic for junk thing...BLEH
User avatar
SmallEQ
experienced
experienced
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 1:08 am

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by SmallEQ »

I saw the name "Torns Peaker" for years thinking it was "Tom's Peaker". Then once I realized it was actually "Torns Peaker" it took me another couple of months to get the joke.

I'm Quick!
Birthday Boy
committed
committed
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:36 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by Birthday Boy »

It's a great pedal at what it does; trebly, trashy punk and odd, broken overdrives (last one with the guitar volume back). That's what I've been using it for at least, but I mainly play a Tele. It's different, pretty compressed, fuller and less abrasive with a Les Paul, and has a lovely, squishy attack. More exciting with single coils to me though. It's pretty sensitive regarding what's in front of it. I was just thinking of trying to trade it for a low gain overdrive, cause I don't have one right now. I'd definately miss it though.

CaptainWampum wrote:
univalve wrote:i had a tp and white spider. i really liked the sound by itself but both were not cutting through the mix with the band. :idk:


This is weird to me. I played in a 7 piece with two other guitarists and the TP helped me really really cut through.


Wouldn't it have a lot to do with how the rest of the band was EQ'd? Treble doesn't really cut through treble, but if the other stuff is lower it gets a "niche" in the mix..
User avatar
sylnau
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10403
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:38 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by sylnau »

I wish the current TP would have the second footswitch for oscillation (like the old effector 13 or the oohlala version).
Never tried one... but, it's on my list of thing to try.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." --John Cage

http://www.youtube.com/sylnau
User avatar
ohsojayadeva
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1154
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 9:08 pm
Location: Charlottesville Virginia, USA

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by ohsojayadeva »

bigchiefbc wrote:I had a TP for a while, but I honestly prefer the Aenima. I think there's only like 1 component different between them, but the Ae just felt like it had more bawlz, ya know? Similar sound, more bawlz.


One resistor difference between the two. This can easily be made switchable. I can't recall the exact value, but I know that the resistor in the Aenima is 10x the value in the TP. I had an Aenima, didn't bond. I modded it to TP, still didn't bond. I passed it along to a fellow noisemaker who has been tickled with it. Different strokes.
User avatar
CaptainWampum
experienced
experienced
Posts: 655
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:19 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by CaptainWampum »

bigchiefbc wrote:I had a TP for a while, but I honestly prefer the Aenima. I think there's only like 1 component different between them, but the Ae just felt like it had more bawlz, ya know? Similar sound, more bawlz.


Aenima's just way smoother I think. TP's got a trashy wiggly thing going on.
User avatar
Rygot
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 11:07 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

Re: Anyone else totally obsessed with the Torns Peaker?

Post by Rygot »

I loved the TP and always meant to get one, I only had it in a shoegazer and I wasn't a big fan of it combined.

...one day.
Post Reply