bronzetalon wrote:
Fender Twin RI w/ Mesa 3/4 Closed Back 1x12 cab.
how do you like that Mesa cab? I'm about to be 112 shopping.
Moderator: Ghost Hip

bronzetalon wrote:
Fender Twin RI w/ Mesa 3/4 Closed Back 1x12 cab.

loudwizard wrote:bronzetalon wrote:
Fender Twin RI w/ Mesa 3/4 Closed Back 1x12 cab.
how do you like that Mesa cab? I'm about to be 112 shopping.




TroySanders wrote:kinda figured that. never figured a concert bass would sound like a twin tho.
Chankgeez wrote:
DWARFCRAFT: We are not fucking around this year.

aen wrote:
This thing is immense. It sounds like a Twin reverb, minus the reverb. BUT THATS WHAT THEY INVENTED PEDALS FOR!!!
Next step- upgrade 15" cab and level venues.
THANKS SONIDERO!!!!!!!


aen wrote:TroySanders wrote:kinda figured that. never figured a concert bass would sound like a twin tho.
Twins are really powerful, warm, full frequency amps, it's just that the open back lets a lot of bass fall out the back, and anyway, most idiots just turn them up too loud and roll off all the lows and play shitty tube screamers through them. Which is why they ahve that "icepick" reputation.
.
Tom Dalton wrote:"I want to be as big as I can if it's going to stop a bullet."

Does it have a CSA label? Doesn't look like it does, but if it does and if it has the code LR24510, it's a Garnet. Otherwise it's something else. From the looks of it, I'd guess something else.WayToHip wrote:aen wrote:TroySanders wrote:I can't tell who made this, b/c I have two stories:
1. Garnet designed, made by Kitchener Electronics. Meant to be used in public schools as a classroom amp.
2. United Amp brand, model name is Conservatory 55T, made by high school students as a shop project. Came from BC.
I believe the first story the most, Garnet licensed his designs a lot, and United Conservatory was a music store chain here in Alberta. Story 2 sounds sexier though. It is a 5-watt, 5-inch speaker(original speaker).
I don't know why there are three inputs, the middle one is the loudest by a slight hair. Has only Volume, Off/Tone, and Off/Tremolo. Super clean, at least for me. Nice warm, indie sound. Tremolo was the dealer maker for me; it's smooth and tastful.


devnulljp wrote:Does it have a CSA label? Doesn't look like it does, but if it does and if it has the code LR24510, it's a Garnet. Otherwise it's something else. From the looks of it, I'd guess something else.
. Once I get into it I'll take a picture, I think it's all tube, even the tremolo.Tom Dalton wrote:"I want to be as big as I can if it's going to stop a bullet."


aen wrote:Or I'll just use fuzz. Then Ill sound cool regardless.
Achtane wrote:Well, volcanoes are pretty fuckin' cool. Like I guess lava flows are doomy. Slow and still able to to melt your eardrums.

proroby wrote:Recently moved back to Philly for the summer. In between pedal boards so I don't have my pedals set up atm. They will go right there on the carpet though!
shitty iphone...

Ragged Trousers wrote:Jimi didn't realise the horrible tone suck we had to listen to every time he used that wah.retinal orbita wrote:Shocking that one doesn't need 2000k in boutique pedals to do interesting things anymore....
I saw this picture of Hendrix, all he used was a wah.... And not even the Jim Dunlop Jimi Hedrix wah, just some old thing.....

Baxandall wrote:Another Diabolical!![]()
![]()
![]()


proroby wrote:Baxandall wrote:Another Diabolical!![]()
![]()
![]()
Indeed, an LFO-17. It has an awesome tube tremolo, much different then my twin's. I love it. Going into that 2x15 Ampeg cab with a weber california and michigan in it, I can't put the volume above 9 without damaging my ears, so I have yet to hear it cranked and fuzzed out, but I have plently of pedals to do that.
Ragged Trousers wrote:Jimi didn't realise the horrible tone suck we had to listen to every time he used that wah.retinal orbita wrote:Shocking that one doesn't need 2000k in boutique pedals to do interesting things anymore....
I saw this picture of Hendrix, all he used was a wah.... And not even the Jim Dunlop Jimi Hedrix wah, just some old thing.....