I enjoyed my Picture Wah, I think thats an RMC4. However, I greatly, infinitely enjoy my Fender Fuzz-Wah from the late 60s. It has fuzz, wah, and volume. However, the wah by itself isn't that great.
There's a snake in my boots. Someone poisoned the waterhole!
univalve wrote:Just out of curiosity (and optics) i bought the Alice in chains wah recently. It is somehow more aggressiv and works better with distortion and fuzz...
Nice! I have wanted a RMC Wizard Wah since the beginning of time, but the Cantrell Wah has made me go "hmmm". After hearing you say that, I'm going "hmmmmmmmmmmm".
Hacken wrote:Im about to buy an MXR CAE wah, i think it has great specs like a built in boost, two different inductors and true bypass. Its like 150 bucks on proguitarshop and i think its fair since a standard cry-baby is 99$
But i havent use wah that much and havent been able to compare everthing out there.
I have the MXR CAE. It's really awesome! You'll love it I'm sure of it.
Talking about SICK sweep: Snarling Dogs Mold Spore Psychoscumatic Wah /Ringmod. Does have seveal wah flavors, which are not bad at all. And has a rather versatile and controllable ringmod tone You can add before the wah. It has a few issues, though:
The thing is built from good parts but assembled cheap = the reason why they get broken in use. The pedal is worth fixing, though, if You're into mind bending psychedelics and ringmod tones.
It really doesn't work too good with batteries. Using a dc power fixes any troubles with inconsistent operating and volume drops.
:::: Metal up Yöur Jazz! with FUZZIFERblack psychedelic doom ::::
Ugly Nora wrote:It's a sad day when Bassus Sanguinis becomes the voice of reason.