tchen wrote:all the clips ive heard of the digitech hardwire verb sounded surprisingly good, especially the reverse and gate. pretty affordable too. wouldnt mind picking one up someday. with that said, i bought got a yamaha magicstomp a while back specifically for the reverse reverb.
That's because they use Lexicon reverbs in this pedal. I wouldn't really consider the Hardwire to be Digitech product. I would definitely give the RV-7 a chance Thrushie. There's not a lot of reverse options out there and I think this one would beat out the Marshall.
modernage wrote:That's because they use Lexicon reverbs in this pedal. I wouldn't really consider the Hardwire to be Digitech product. I would definitely give the RV-7 a chance Thrushie. There's not a lot of reverse options out there and I think this one would beat out the Marshall.
hmmm... will have to give the rv-7 a test run. reading about some controversy with their "true bypass" claims. forgetting the "trailing" function, can anyone confirm whether it is or is not strictly speaking true bypass as we know it here in normal operation?
can anyone comment on the stomp boxes compared directly to the MidiVerb II and/or SPX90 reverse reverbs? i keep a small rack with MV II/SPX90/GEP50 largely for reverse verbs (and reverbs/mods in general) which adds some functionality but is also kind of an ass-pain, and a stompy reverse option would be nice. the thing about the Yamaha rack units, though, is that you can tweak the parameters more than a typical stompbox and get some sick weirdness. and that you can get them used for $50-$75 each.
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
FIFTY YEARS OF SCARING THE CHILDREN 1970-2020--and i'm not done yet
dubkitty wrote:can anyone comment on the stomp boxes compared directly to the MidiVerb II and/or SPX90 reverse reverbs? i keep a small rack with MV II/SPX90/GEP50 largely for reverse verbs (and reverbs/mods in general) which adds some functionality but is also kind of an ass-pain, and a stompy reverse option would be nice. the thing about the Yamaha rack units, though, is that you can tweak the parameters more than a typical stompbox and get some sick weirdness. and that you can get them used for $50-$75 each.
Supposedly the Yamaha Magicstomps have everything the SPX series has... and more. I've never owned a rack version, but I have the Magicstomp and it sounds great. Hook it up to a PC and you have endless parameter tweaking. But I think the Magicstomp pedal is suppose to use the same software or whatever that all their old rackmount stuff had... so the pedal comes with most of the effects that were on all those; but if there ssomething missing, im pretty sure theres the ability to download it into the pedal.
The4455 wrote:Just throwing it out there, but is there a "Empress Super delay" of Reverb, that is probably also made by Empress?
In my opinion the top 3 Supereverbs out there are the Strymon BlueSky, Dr Scientist RRR, and the Line 6 M9. I have major GAS for the BlueSky (the only one I don't have).
I had one of those hardwire reverbs because there are so few pedal options for a reverse reverb. It's built well and all, but the reverse reverb just didn't do it for me. It's worth picking up used to give it a try, but I think a rack effect might be the way to go. The plate's great on it though.
Tom Dalton wrote:You're a dumbass for making this thread to begin with.
magiclawnchair wrote:fuck that bitter old man
smile_man wrote:
ifeellikeatourist wrote:
Pedals aren't everything, yada, yada, yeah I know.
fuck you.
McSpunckle wrote:I ctrl+f'd mountain goats and decided we aren't friends anymore.
If you have a reverse delay put it on with minimal feedback into a short decaying plate reverb. It might not be exactly the same but you get the same effect.
thezeng wrote:If you have a reverse delay put it on with minimal feedback into a short decaying plate reverb. It might not be exactly the same but you get the same effect.
