

Moderator: Ghost Hip
Dandolin wrote:ooh! do tell....cosmicevan wrote:Lurch Audio modulation craziness
[don't see it on their website? off to insta]
i mean. it's not the silo, right?
is it the ergot? [that name def sounds like it would fit "modulation craziness"]![]()
It was indeed the Silo. I ended up balking when the $297 turned into $340 with taxes and shipping so I didn't snag one. I'll ponder it for the next several days. I really like his work, stuff sounds pretty tone-annihilating and the look is second to few. I have an Ergot and a Sorghum from Lurch that I like a LOT. Just been so spendy lately hard to make a move on a $340 pedal that if I ever decide to sell, no one will care about but me (probably).manymanyhaha wrote:I'm interested too since that Silo looks amazing (though too large for a mono pedal for my board). But modulation is the new 'it' thing if my opinion matters and lots of knobs and switches gets me
All very fair points.friendship wrote:Might be worth noting that the RE-20 debuted in 2007 at an MSRP of $339 USD*, which adjusted for inflation to 2022 would be $464. The RE-202's MSRP is $519, which is about an 11% price increase from the RE-20. But also, the RE-202 expands on the RE-20's features by giving you control over repeat saturation & wow/flutter, tape age, presets, defeat of the preamp, an extra footswitch, an extra playhead, and a few extra reverb algos. The only thing missing is continuous control over the input preamp.
I was pumped to get one at the time, and I remember reading mostly complaints about the RE-20--why so much money for just one sound, it doesn't even have presets, huhhhh? Go read some TGP pages from back then, it's hilarious watching them try to figure out what the appeal of an accurate, solid simulation of an iconic tape echo was.
I was planning on getting the RE-2 as a backup to my RE-20, but the RE-202 is tempting. A lot of the common user complaints addressed by the RE-202 were never a problem for me, personally--I like the preamp, I think the reverb is dope as fuck, and I don't need presets. But the extra playhead and control over age and saturation is compelling!
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
Gone Fission wrote:Also they have a new logo that just looks like random shapes IMO, but I’ve never known logos to generate sound, so whatevs.
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
The first TE bootleg that will cost CB prixes?Dandolin wrote:wait- do ya suppose this is for real?
Also worth noting: April 1 is Friday![]()
Google says it’s an experimental delay with memory.coupleonapkins wrote:
This looks like a feedback looper + delay line