Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
Blackened Soul
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4756
Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 1:41 am
Location: puget sound where even the moss is covered in moss
Contact:

Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by Blackened Soul »

Has any one compared a DOD Meatbox against a dbx Subharmonic Synthesizer?
Does the reissue Meatbox fix the tracking issues of the original or is it just a copy?
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42254
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by Chankgeez »

Are you also interested in comparison to a Mantic Hulk and/or Density Hulk? :idk: Because I am. :snax:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
qersty
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:11 am
Location: Sweden to the oldies

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by qersty »

As I have understood the meatbox is like an octaver into the "epic trademark"-bass of a boom box to emulate subharmonic synthesis. I have never really understood what subharmonic synthesis is if it is not just a beefy octaver for disco soundsystems. Are the harmonics just static sines?
imagine finding out your son is your daughter & she's into noise music
User avatar
coupleonapkins
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2882
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by coupleonapkins »

Maybe I had imagined Juan Alderete doing a comparison, but I think he just mentioned it in passing during one of the Meatbox reissue vids.

I would only argue that the relatively recent update(s) of the Meatbox would have better tracking than an extinct rack unit, especially since they are both Harman properties :snax:
Chankgeez wrote:Are you also interested in comparison to a Mantic Hulk and/or Density Hulk? :idk: Because I am. :snax:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHWmJ0o6-qo[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHWmJ0o6-qo

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIJsBdbJcrI[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIJsBdbJcrI

Image
Good morning!
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42254
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by Chankgeez »

:lol: :idk:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
whoismarykelly
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:25 pm

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by whoismarykelly »

coupleonapkins wrote:Maybe I had imagined Juan Alderete doing a comparison, but I think he just mentioned it in passing during one of the Meatbox reissue vids.

I would only argue that the relatively recent update(s) of the Meatbox would have better tracking than an extinct rack unit, especially since they are both Harman properties :snax:
Chankgeez wrote:Are you also interested in comparison to a Mantic Hulk and/or Density Hulk? :idk: Because I am. :snax:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHWmJ0o6-qo[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHWmJ0o6-qo

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIJsBdbJcrI[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yIJsBdbJcrI

Image

I don't know of Tom & Friends made changes to the reissue but it likely uses the same Mitsubishi subharmonic synthesizer as the original units and would be subject to the same tracking issues. Its the kind of thing that sounds terrible played alone but huge when its in a band mix and you don't notice the tracking shifting around as much.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

Yeah my experience playing with people using a meatbox is that I never notice the actual tracked note so much when it's turned on, just a massive wall of bass.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
K2000
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1482
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:35 pm

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by K2000 »

In my experience with the Meatbox, a 50-50 mix between wet and dry is best. Less than 50% wet, it's not that noticeable. More than 50% wet, it starts to replace your note and sounds dumb and muddy. With the right mix it enhances your note and makes it sound huge.

Add the Peavey Kosmos into the shootout arena if you're willing to consider rack gear. And there's another (newer) Peavey rack unit that includes Kosmos capability (it may be a crossover? or EQ?)
User avatar
qersty
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:11 am
Location: Sweden to the oldies

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by qersty »

K2000 wrote:In my experience with the Meatbox, a 50-50 mix between wet and dry is best. Less than 50% wet, it's not that noticeable. More than 50% wet, it starts to replace your note and sounds dumb and muddy. With the right mix it enhances your note and makes it sound huge.

Add the Peavey Kosmos into the shootout arena if you're willing to consider rack gear. And there's another (newer) Peavey rack unit that includes Kosmos capability (it may be a crossover? or EQ?)
I had never heard of this! Really gotta look into peavey rack stuff more.
imagine finding out your son is your daughter & she's into noise music
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by Jwar »

Funny thing for me is I bought a Meatbox (new one) and was actually underwhelmed by it. I think it’s because my ears can’t tell the difference anymore in some frequencies. Everyone in my house felt it though lol!

The tracking is awful past noon or so but it also turns into a muddy mess that kind of sounds synthy but I’m afraid to amplify it too much. I’ve already blown a sub once with the Destoyer (Black Arts Toneworks), so I’m scared to do it again lol!


I will say though, it pushes a lot of air. Like a lot.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

:lol: Yeah as I mentioned I find it's far more about flapping trousers with air than it is being an octaver. The notes it's pushing out are kind of incidental to what it's doing.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
greyscales
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2101
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 7:07 pm
Location: Tampa
Contact:

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by greyscales »

I always found the Meatbox tracks about as well as an OC-2. It'll get glitchy between a couple notes but it has so much sub that you feel it more than hear it.

In live settings with a Bass VI I often used it without any octave down, just adding a lot of low end beefiness from the eq. Less chance of blowing speakers that way (which I've done on more than one occasion).
PanicProne
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1066
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:16 pm
Location: Swengland
Contact:

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by PanicProne »

Perhaps not much input here but anyways. Not personally tried any of them but had a friend who always said the Mantic blew the meatbox out of the water in every possible way.
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by D.o.S. »

coldbrightsunlight wrote::lol: Yeah as I mentioned I find it's far more about flapping trousers with air than it is being an octaver. The notes it's pushing out are kind of incidental to what it's doing.
Yep. It's a Make Better button. It makes your tone better.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Subharmonic Synthesizers vs Meatbox?

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

:rock: That it does.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
Post Reply