qersty wrote:Trackers are a different workflow, thats mostly why. I like it way more than filling out a piano roll in a "regular" DAW and I couldn't tell you why. I guess it's more like working on hardware but it is also pretty much as computerized writing music can be. I agree it is kinda stupid to have a tracker in a box just so you are DAWless and couldnt tell you why its surfacing other than it being idem as fuck.
Best thing about trackers tho are the real time sample effects, you can do chopping pretty much on the fly in the midi note roll once you get it down plus alot of stuttery jittry and gatery stuff
If it gives you the ability to do things that are more difficult to so in a DAW, or if it’s a workflow thing, then I can see using one. Those two reasons are the essence of why I don’t use a DAW.
tremolo3 wrote:[quote="<a href="tel:01010111">01010111</a>"]This seems like a step backwards in a weird way??
Isn't everything a step backwards in a weird way since the conception of (even weirder) technologies like pure data and supercollider?
Interface of that Poylend tracker looks good and intuitive, and I think that's what the average musician appreciate the most. Although hardware is getting more and more complex that just getting a PC setup would be more logical, downside is that these days gear is more appealing than the things we create with

[/quote]
If it’s intuitive and easy to use/set up, then it makes sense. I agree that as you get a more complex hardware setup, it seems like there’s a point where it just makes more sense to make a PC setup. Gear has always been more enticing than actually creating something, new gear has the promise of new and unknown sounds and abilities. If that promise is true, then it undercuts the value of anything you could make without that new gear. Potentially increasing your abilities through purchasing is always going to be more appealing than actually doing something.