Shallow Water vs...

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
ALLisNOISE
committed
committed
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:18 pm

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by ALLisNOISE »

oldangelmidnight wrote: Maybe the Boss MD500?
.
THIS! I was killing time at work today and was unexpectedly wowed by the “scanner” mode on the Vibrato!
It’s not random, per se, but it has input volume control over depth, and if the editing capabilities are as deep as the DD500, you can get pretty crazy with it!
User avatar
tremolo3
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2764
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 1:09 am
Location: Oaxaca, MX
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by tremolo3 »

ALLisNOISE wrote:
oldangelmidnight wrote: Maybe the Boss MD500?
.
THIS! I was killing time at work today and was unexpectedly wowed by the “scanner” mode on the Vibrato!
It’s not random, per se, but it has input volume control over depth, and if the editing capabilities are as deep as the DD500, you can get pretty crazy with it!
There are enough "assign" controls to make it sound random until a captcha realizes it's just semi-random.
John wrote:"guys play quiet, listen to my small costly device."
PumpkinPieces wrote:Fer shoogaze
tuffteef wrote:all you need is a big muff and feelings
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by D.o.S. »

UglyCasanova wrote:Shallow water is very, very subtle. The transparent overdrive of modulation. I personally didn't like it at all, but I know some people swear by it.
My boi.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
mcatano
committed
committed
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 9:59 am

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by mcatano »

I also had a shallow water for a while and sold it. I thought it sounded really nice on its own but I had a really hard time getting it to sit nicely in a mix with anything else. I think if you're doing solo loop/soundscape-y stuff it's a really nice effect; I much prefer it on its own to the gen loss.
User avatar
Ghost Hip
moderator
moderator
Posts: 7469
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:11 am
Location: Detroit

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Ghost Hip »

I really like the shallow water near the end of my guitar chain set 100% wet. I had great results making count to five or MOOD background loops for a solo singer/guitar performance. The way it modulates the background ambient loops with the clean guitar really suited what I was doing. It adds a lot of character to a solo performance, for me at least.

However, I am not a big fan of using it with a synth set up. The LPG surprisingly doesn't sound the way I'd like it to surprisingly.

Also want to note I bought the Alexander Super Neomatic pedal hoping it would replace the shallow water and be able to do more, but it didn't really capture the same vibe. Great pedal though. I'd just look towards other lo-fi/tape warble type pedals i that's what you're going for.
Youtube Channel?
mr. sound boy king wrote: Organic apples are not normal, they are special, like analog, whereas normal apples, like digital, taste sterile and lack warmth.
friendship wrote: y u h8 swoosh woosh
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13514
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by goroth »

I also use it end of chain 100% wet.

I don't get the LPG. I'm assuming I have it set up wrong, but it doesn't seem all that dynamic. It's just degrees of wet blanket.
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

That was my experience of the lpg as well
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
sylnau
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 10403
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 1:38 pm
Location: Quebec City

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by sylnau »

I'm a big fan of Fairfield stuff... but I never understand this one and sold it. It doesn't do much for the price paid.
"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones." --John Cage

http://www.youtube.com/sylnau
User avatar
Cody_Pole
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 pm
Location: Bangor,Maine
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Cody_Pole »

What about the Instant Lo Fi Junky?
Deflating Expectations.


Good Dudes: blooghost,bob the robot,Jero,dorfmeister,modernage,oneloudrash,noisemaker effects,vidarr,rosscanyonsofstatic,inertia,communarchy,kosta,culturejam,zzz,actionindex, dorfmeister,pumpkin pieces,monkeyboy,nieh,sweetbabyphil,D.O.S and corrinica !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Benn Roe
experienced
experienced
Posts: 668
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 5:36 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Benn Roe »

I also had no luck with the Shallow Water. It sounded great in demos, but basically did nothing with my setup. The effect was almost indiscernable at virtually every setting. I have a Generation Loss, which works a lot better for me, though I struggled with it until trading out the standard version for the Chase Bliss chassis. The controls just work better for me, and it dealt with the volume-drop issues.
Former Bands: Lazy Gaga, Kadis-kot, Pyramids, In First Person, the Holy Fucking Spirit, Take Down Your Art, A Petal Fallen
User avatar
Dowi
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Dowi »

Shouldn't the Pladask Romferd be something like that too? Never had one but from the demos i heard i'd put it into the realm of random modulators.
BIRCH BARK | Solo stuff | Bandcamp - Youtube
HIBAGON | Polyrhythmic Heavy Duo | Bandcamp - Spotyshit
User avatar
niftyprose
committed
committed
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:46 am

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by niftyprose »

Thx everyone. After much thought and some reviews of my idiosyncratic signal chain I'm probably going with Doug Tuttle's Random Phase Vibrato (assuming I can get one). The RPV [has just arrived] on the Mid-Fi site but has one big knob, making it that much more versatile than the nothing-but-a-footswitch Random Vibrato, However, since I suspect I will hanker after the Fairfield's LPF, I'd like to offer particular thanks for the Zoom tweak idea. Plan B, f'sure.
"She opened the case of my guitar and placed six fingertips to the pick-ups beneath the strings. She made me a tea from the dried orange skins on her fire, and taught me the way of guitar voodoo." -- Jim Carroll, 'The Book Of Nods'
User avatar
voerking
experienced
experienced
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Saint Louis

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by voerking »

i, too, found the Shallow Water too dark...although i wish i had kept it, because i can see using it when mixing recorded tracks, even though it didn't work for me as a guitar pedal.

The Aqueduct has a lot of cool sounds, but the latency is really a bummer for me.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

It has a latency in the wet signal? That really sucks.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
voerking
experienced
experienced
Posts: 908
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:07 am
Location: Saint Louis

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by voerking »

coldbrightsunlight wrote:It has a latency in the wet signal? That really sucks.
yes. it's especially obvious/annoying when using the footswitch in momentary mode. there's always a hiccup as the pedal catches up. you can hear it in the demos...listen to this one around 7:25:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ogou7JIB0I[/youtube]
Post Reply