Shallow Water vs...

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
niftyprose
committed
committed
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 5:46 am

Shallow Water vs...

Post by niftyprose »

Hello guys, a question for users of the Fairfield Shallow Water. I loved the demos I heard, esp. Knobs'. But FC stuff is very, very expensive over here, and the Mid-Fi Random Vibrato and Random Phase Vibrato seem to do most of what I want. Anyone with hands-on on these random modulators able to offer perspective? Best, NP
"She opened the case of my guitar and placed six fingertips to the pick-ups beneath the strings. She made me a tea from the dried orange skins on her fire, and taught me the way of guitar voodoo." -- Jim Carroll, 'The Book Of Nods'
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

I used to have a Shallow Water and I found it too... shallow. :lol: Sorry for obvious joke. I just thought it was too subtle on most settings, but this is more a factor of what I do which is normally plenty of fuzz in noisy bands where nuanced subtle sounds are pointless. It sounded like a better idea and it sounds great when other people play it.

So... maybe I'm not the best placed to comment lol. I haven't played either of the other two. Mid fi also sounds too subtle for me from demos, don't know anything about the random phase vibrato.

The Earthquaker Aqueduct has a "random" mode so might be worth having a look at that one too.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
goosekevin
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2236
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm
Location: NSW Australia

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by goosekevin »

coldbrightsunlight wrote: The Earthquaker Aqueduct has a "random" mode so might be worth having a look at that one too.
came here to post about this!! love the random mode, wanted a shallow water for ages but all the demos seemed too subtle and also too dark~ for my taste, the aqueduct scratches that itch and also has a shitload of other really cool modes
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
User avatar
Cody_Pole
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 pm
Location: Bangor,Maine
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Cody_Pole »

Dude get a woozy it replaced my clarinot for what I use it for!
Deflating Expectations.


Good Dudes: blooghost,bob the robot,Jero,dorfmeister,modernage,oneloudrash,noisemaker effects,vidarr,rosscanyonsofstatic,inertia,communarchy,kosta,culturejam,zzz,actionindex, dorfmeister,pumpkin pieces,monkeyboy,nieh,sweetbabyphil,D.O.S and corrinica !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Cody_Pole
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 pm
Location: Bangor,Maine
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Cody_Pole »

goosekevin wrote:
coldbrightsunlight wrote: The Earthquaker Aqueduct has a "random" mode so might be worth having a look at that one too.
came here to post about this!! love the random mode, wanted a shallow water for ages but all the demos seemed too subtle and also too dark~ for my taste, the aqueduct scratches that itch and also has a shitload of other really cool modes

Also this too!
Deflating Expectations.


Good Dudes: blooghost,bob the robot,Jero,dorfmeister,modernage,oneloudrash,noisemaker effects,vidarr,rosscanyonsofstatic,inertia,communarchy,kosta,culturejam,zzz,actionindex, dorfmeister,pumpkin pieces,monkeyboy,nieh,sweetbabyphil,D.O.S and corrinica !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
UglyCasanova
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 12554
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:47 am
Location: Norway

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by UglyCasanova »

Shallow water is very, very subtle. The transparent overdrive of modulation. I personally didn't like it at all, but I know some people swear by it.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

yeah that.

Forgot about the woozy that thing looks fun in demos too
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
adamajah
experienced
experienced
Posts: 984
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 10:35 pm

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by adamajah »

The magic of the Shallow Water is mostly two things: the randomness of the warble, and the Low Pass Gate.
I pretty much never use it less than 100% wet (ie. not a chorus), but just as a warbly filter.
The LPG should be a pedal in itself. It's brilliant and no other pedal can do what it does for some reason.
User avatar
oldangelmidnight
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3746
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:17 pm
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by oldangelmidnight »

I had a Shallow Water and also didn't like it because it was too subtle.
An alternative is the Cooper FX style that you can find in the Generation Loss or CBA Dark World. They're kind of different in how mid-focused they are. I don't like them very much.
My favorite alternative is the Pladask Taken. Also pretty pricey but it's got my favorite combination of tone controls, random modulation sounds, and feedback control.
The Copilot Kinkillin can also get some similar sounds; not as clean, though.
Those two are both delays, at their hearts, and maybe you want something more immediate. Maybe the Boss MD500?
The Alexander Colour Theory can be set up to modulate randomly in weird and interesting ways but it can take some work if you're not familiar with the interface.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

I hated the low pass gate because it made my guitar tone less bright and that's almost never what I want. :lol: did I buy the wrong pedal? I bought the wrong pedal.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
qersty
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2760
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 11:11 am
Location: Sweden to the oldies

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by qersty »

Alexander marshmallow has randomized pitch shifting, it isn't subtle. The super neo-matic does it unsubtly too but more traditional time modulation ...if it is still available that is, I think it was like 100 units or something? But yeah marshmallow is awesome UNSUBTLE PITCH MODULATION and does lofi things too if you can live playing with tens of milliseconds of latency.
imagine finding out your son is your daughter & she's into noise music
User avatar
weebles
experienced
experienced
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:32 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by weebles »

I guess it depends on what you want it for?

Of pedals that do similar things, I've tried a Warped Vinyl mkII, Shallow Water, Instant Lo-Fi Junky, and now use a warped vinyl setting on my Nemesis (all of these went into a Fuck OD with reverb either before or after). Shallow Water was the best *sounding* of those options, but I agree with others who've posted - it sounded amazing at 100% wet, but it was a one-trick pony for me and took up quite a bit of space for that one trick. I also found it didn't play with other effects very well.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

Oh yeah Warped Vinyl that's a good one. Doesn't actually do random but I've played with a friend's and using the ramp on speed and wave shaping you can a similar effect to what I was looking for on the Shallow Water but with a much deeper vibrato/chorus. The modulation isn't random but it can sound unpredictable enough for my purposes.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
Dowi
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2659
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Dowi »

Woozy could be a good choice. I often use it in random mode for subtle movement, but it's more focused on the weird than on the subtle side of things. You can do very heavy pitch flutter easily, but it can be quiet if you keep the Sway knob low.
BIRCH BARK | Solo stuff | Bandcamp - Youtube
HIBAGON | Polyrhythmic Heavy Duo | Bandcamp - Spotyshit
User avatar
Cody_Pole
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1327
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:21 pm
Location: Bangor,Maine
Contact:

Re: Shallow Water vs...

Post by Cody_Pole »

Dowi wrote:Woozy could be a good choice. I often use it in random mode for subtle movement, but it's more focused on the weird than on the subtle side of things. You can do very heavy pitch flutter easily, but it can be quiet if you keep the Sway knob low.
So much this! :!!!:
Deflating Expectations.


Good Dudes: blooghost,bob the robot,Jero,dorfmeister,modernage,oneloudrash,noisemaker effects,vidarr,rosscanyonsofstatic,inertia,communarchy,kosta,culturejam,zzz,actionindex, dorfmeister,pumpkin pieces,monkeyboy,nieh,sweetbabyphil,D.O.S and corrinica !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post Reply