Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- Wizard
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:50 am
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
I've been dying for a 616 for over a year now. Ever since their existence was announced here on ILF. I've had a Carbon Copy since it came out, and it was my first analog delay. I wanted the 616 because i love my carbon copy, but the 616 has the modulation trim pots on the outside, making them more easily accessible to tweak. Not to forget the MXR is buffered bypass only, and the 616 has a switchable option.
So for me to do this, i acquired our good buddy Veteransdaypoppy's 616 for a week of recording it.
I went into the studio knowing exactly how every single track i play should sound, and what pedal combinations, amp settings, guitars, etc. etc. BUT this 616 was a variable.
here's what i learned.
The 616 is really finicky. It causes your guitar to feed back at loud volumes even when the regen knob is below 3. The regen knob is very touchy. It responds very sensitively to touch. You move it up a hair and it could send you in to space feedback in an instant. The Carbon Copy is slightly more controlled, it can send you to space feedback in an instant as well, but generally you need the regen knob to be above half way for that to work.
The repeats on the 616 are also a bit granier than the Carbon Copy repeats. It oscillates a bit more and i think i like that about it. in some cases. The oscillations are more in the vein of an old ibanez/maxon delay. I actually had a shoot out between a vintage ibanez analog delay and the carbon copy on the day i bought the carbon copy. Because the carbon copy had smoother sounding repeats, and a more ethereal tone quality to it than the Ibanez.
The worst part about the 616 is the buffer setting. The buffer for my clean tone was fine, it didn't effect the sound nearly at all, but the buffer when the circuit was on, was a giant muddy mess. I had alot of issues having the pedal sound right in my rig, due to the fact that i play a single coil guitar through a fender twin reverb with the bright setting on and treble 75% of the way up. But the fact that the buffered option made that sound muddy, was absurd.
The True Bypass option was what i went with 100% of the time, but it also didn't play very nice, due to how harsh the repeats got with my tone set that bright. I feel the Carbon Copy is a perfect middle ground (soundwise) between the 616's buffered and true bypass.
The modulation on the 616 was actually rather hard to have sound subtle when you were using it. It's awesome because it has a really neat warbley chorus vibrato effect (what modulation on delay does, i know), but when i say vibrato, I SAY VIBRATO. if i had the depth above two the repeats would be slightly out of tune here and there and that was just not what i needed. I've adjusted the Carbon Copy's trim pots inside to just where i like them, and it too has a pretty mean vibrato, but the modulation on it works more like a chorus, there's less pitch warble.
Personally, i preferred the carbon copy. Probably because i owned it much longer, but it's generally a lot less extreme in comparison. Everything when slightly changed on the 616 was changed fairly dramaticly. Which is awesome, because it's versitile. But i think i personally like the tighter toned down style of the carbon copy.
i still used the malekko on every single delay track on the album except one full song. The other songs sort of have this bright in your face quality to them, so it worked really well. but because i needed a smooth warm delay, and it was not cooperating at all whilst trying to get that. VDP had my carbon copy throughout most of my recording sessions, so i really had no choice but that or my trusty old Dano Fab Echo....
but the malekko sounds awesome where i needed it.
Ultimately: get a tape echo.
So for me to do this, i acquired our good buddy Veteransdaypoppy's 616 for a week of recording it.
I went into the studio knowing exactly how every single track i play should sound, and what pedal combinations, amp settings, guitars, etc. etc. BUT this 616 was a variable.
here's what i learned.
The 616 is really finicky. It causes your guitar to feed back at loud volumes even when the regen knob is below 3. The regen knob is very touchy. It responds very sensitively to touch. You move it up a hair and it could send you in to space feedback in an instant. The Carbon Copy is slightly more controlled, it can send you to space feedback in an instant as well, but generally you need the regen knob to be above half way for that to work.
The repeats on the 616 are also a bit granier than the Carbon Copy repeats. It oscillates a bit more and i think i like that about it. in some cases. The oscillations are more in the vein of an old ibanez/maxon delay. I actually had a shoot out between a vintage ibanez analog delay and the carbon copy on the day i bought the carbon copy. Because the carbon copy had smoother sounding repeats, and a more ethereal tone quality to it than the Ibanez.
The worst part about the 616 is the buffer setting. The buffer for my clean tone was fine, it didn't effect the sound nearly at all, but the buffer when the circuit was on, was a giant muddy mess. I had alot of issues having the pedal sound right in my rig, due to the fact that i play a single coil guitar through a fender twin reverb with the bright setting on and treble 75% of the way up. But the fact that the buffered option made that sound muddy, was absurd.
The True Bypass option was what i went with 100% of the time, but it also didn't play very nice, due to how harsh the repeats got with my tone set that bright. I feel the Carbon Copy is a perfect middle ground (soundwise) between the 616's buffered and true bypass.
The modulation on the 616 was actually rather hard to have sound subtle when you were using it. It's awesome because it has a really neat warbley chorus vibrato effect (what modulation on delay does, i know), but when i say vibrato, I SAY VIBRATO. if i had the depth above two the repeats would be slightly out of tune here and there and that was just not what i needed. I've adjusted the Carbon Copy's trim pots inside to just where i like them, and it too has a pretty mean vibrato, but the modulation on it works more like a chorus, there's less pitch warble.
Personally, i preferred the carbon copy. Probably because i owned it much longer, but it's generally a lot less extreme in comparison. Everything when slightly changed on the 616 was changed fairly dramaticly. Which is awesome, because it's versitile. But i think i personally like the tighter toned down style of the carbon copy.
i still used the malekko on every single delay track on the album except one full song. The other songs sort of have this bright in your face quality to them, so it worked really well. but because i needed a smooth warm delay, and it was not cooperating at all whilst trying to get that. VDP had my carbon copy throughout most of my recording sessions, so i really had no choice but that or my trusty old Dano Fab Echo....
but the malekko sounds awesome where i needed it.
Ultimately: get a tape echo.
I've got a fuzzbox and i'm not afraid to use it
jrmy wrote:And unlike the rest of the country, we recognize Sarcasm as a crucial building block of spoken language. Kind of like umami in cooking.
- Nychthemeron
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2817
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:39 pm
- Location: CA & MD
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Nice sum up at the end, man.
Do you like listening to homemade music? Me too. Why don't you try one of mine?
Current ILF Love: OHNOHO CHK CHK BOOM, Mellowtone Melx Fuzz 2, EQD Dream Crusher, Devi Ever ID, Dr. Scientist Proto-Miniberator - new vids eventually
some mysteries are best unsolved
Current ILF Love: OHNOHO CHK CHK BOOM, Mellowtone Melx Fuzz 2, EQD Dream Crusher, Devi Ever ID, Dr. Scientist Proto-Miniberator - new vids eventually
some mysteries are best unsolved
- smile_man
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4531
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
I don't really like Malekko.


http://tsunshining.bandcamp.com/ - jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
zackv wrote:stop fooling around and shell out the 320$
SPACERITUAL wrote:SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRITUAAAAAAAAAAAAAL
- floating opera
- committed

- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 3:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
smile_man wrote:I don't really like Malekko.
+1. Malekko & Catlinbread will never see a DOLLAR of my hard earned money. i will NEVER buy either one of those brands pedals.
Tom Dalton wrote: The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.
NSFW: show
- Blurillaz
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:31 pm
- Location: A level you spend too long in
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
floating opera wrote:+1. Malekko & Catlinbread will never see a DOLLAR of my hard earned money. i will NEVER buy either one of those brands pedals.
What if Wavves uses one?
we
- Gunner Recall
- moderator

- Posts: 4828
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: NY
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Do you happen to know when the 616 was built?
Weird about the buffer thing, most people seem to prefer it on buffer mode.
Weird about the buffer thing, most people seem to prefer it on buffer mode.
There are some that call me...morningstaru?
- floating opera
- committed

- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 3:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Blurillaz wrote:floating opera wrote:+1. Malekko & Catlinbread will never see a DOLLAR of my hard earned money. i will NEVER buy either one of those brands pedals.
What if Wavves uses one?
come on dawg Wavves uses Boss pedals. nonetheless. its ironic how all the bands/grupos/musicians et cetera i dig use off-the-rack pedals like Boss-Digitech-MXR et cetera.

Tom Dalton wrote: The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.
NSFW: show
- smile_man
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4531
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
floating opera wrote:
come on dawg Wavves uses Boss pedals. nonetheless. its ironic how all the bands/grupos/musicians et cetera i dig use off-the-rack pedals like Boss-Digitech-MXR et cetera.
Noise music is either boss pedals OR really expensive rack/modular setups.
http://tsunshining.bandcamp.com/ - jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
zackv wrote:stop fooling around and shell out the 320$
SPACERITUAL wrote:SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRITUAAAAAAAAAAAAAL
- floating opera
- committed

- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 3:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
smile_man wrote:
Noise music is either boss pedals OR really expensive rack/modular setups.
well for NOISE its all like DOD pedals. & yeah expensive modular & synths set-ups but not a whole lot of them use rack stuff. i don't know what's used for Noise Music.

Tom Dalton wrote: The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.
NSFW: show
- smile_man
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4531
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
:P I meant NOISE.
HEALTH is mostly the boss slicer, I suppose they are noise music.
HEALTH is mostly the boss slicer, I suppose they are noise music.
http://tsunshining.bandcamp.com/ - jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
zackv wrote:stop fooling around and shell out the 320$
SPACERITUAL wrote:SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRITUAAAAAAAAAAAAAL
- floating opera
- committed

- Posts: 336
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 3:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
man i remember when everyone was buying/talking about the MXR Carbon Copy. analog delay-wise now i've been jonesin' for a vintage DOD analog delay or a Memory Toy. i'd get a Carbon Copy though if i could find one used for a cheap-ish price.
Tom Dalton wrote: The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.
NSFW: show
- Mudfuzz
- HERO

- Posts: 16705
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
- Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Maybe they have gotten better but my guitarist's CC [first gen] stopped working early on. I kind'a lost interest in the things after that.
- smile_man
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4531
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:47 pm
- Location: Toronto
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Isn't the Mem Toy cheaper than the CC? I remember people were calling it the "Carbon Copy Killer".
My friend has one but I don't really like it all that much, the repeats weren't very audible.
My friend has one but I don't really like it all that much, the repeats weren't very audible.
http://tsunshining.bandcamp.com/ - jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
http://www.jamiecoxxx.tumblr.com - art jamz
zackv wrote:stop fooling around and shell out the 320$
SPACERITUAL wrote:SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRITUAAAAAAAAAAAAAL
- theavondon
- Supporter

- Posts: 10742
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
- Location: Denton, TX
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
smile_man wrote:Isn't the Mem Toy cheaper than the CC? I remember people were calling it the "Carbon Copy Killer".
My friend has one but I don't really like it all that much, the repeats weren't very audible.
I enjoy my memory toy.
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
NSFW: show
- hazelwould
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 3590
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:35 pm
Re: Delay Shoot Out: MXR Carbon Copy v. Malekko 616
Wait... So what's wrong with Malekko?