The controversial gear thread

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
vallaton
committed
committed
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:43 am
Location: Helsinki

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by vallaton »

i can't wait for the podcast to come out!
AlexGlassLungs
committed
committed
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:23 pm

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by AlexGlassLungs »

worra wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote:If I put my Matchless up against my friends Marshall DSL it is noticeably way better in tone and it’s not even debatable, that doesn’t mean he should buy a Matchless, it just means that something out there sounds better.

Are you even reading what you're writing?

Ok you got me on that one...
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

AlexGlassLungs wrote:
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Can you please post a video like I said. I want to hear the toan loss from analog to digital through your magical amp.

It’s more than that. Have you ever stuck two strymon pedals next to each other in your chain? Have you not noticed the hissing sound that comes from them even when they’re off? Those pedals are so picky with what’s even next to it especially another strymon pedal. The repeats on an analog delay breakup as it trails when chopping repeated notes from the delay and playing notes over them they bloom and have a natural breakup to them this is something unachivable with a digital delay. That was my point, that’s why I asked why some people run both, I personally can’t get past the perfect robotic feel of digital sounds, I can hear the natural break up and feel of analog pedals. And I do use buffers but most digital pedals have an added buffer inside which if too many are in your chain it adds to a hissy signal and unwanted “distortion” of the the signal. At this point the square wave forms of digital are so small I can’t tell but I can tell how they react with my other pedals and my amp and most of all my signal
I have had several Strymons next to each other and I have a dead quite signal path. I'm not sure what could be causing that for you, but it's not an issue for me.

I mean, I get what you're saying, I've just never personally experienced it.

Here's my current board. Lots of digital. Obviously there's some degradation of the signal due to the massive path but it's not horrible and barely noticeable.

Image
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
vallaton
committed
committed
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:43 am
Location: Helsinki

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by vallaton »

AlexGlassLungs wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:Still waiting on a definition of a digital buffer.
Most digital pedals are buffered bypass and not true bypass.
AlexGlassLungs wrote:I can crush you in gear knowledge, you don’t know me at all...
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by D.o.S. »

AlexGlassLungs wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:Still waiting on a definition of a digital buffer.
Most digital pedals are buffered bypass and not true bypass.
So you don't care about analog or digital, you care about true bypass or buffered bypass (and the millions of variation therein).

Jwar asked you what you though of digital pedals with TBP. You didn't say shit. Because "analog" and "digital" bypasses are nonsense terms that you've clung to desperately?
Last edited by D.o.S. on Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
BetterOffShred
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3412
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:01 pm

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by BetterOffShred »

worra wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote:If I put my Matchless up against my friends Marshall DSL it is noticeably way better in tone and it’s not even debatable, that doesn’t mean he should buy a Matchless, it just means that something out there sounds better.

Are you even reading what you're writing?
Second..
What tone?
Way Better? That's the most Quantifiable statement I've ever read! :snax:

This thread is irritating. All of this stuff is completely subjective and it's only the way the OP has presented his opinions as fact that are controversial. As I said back on page 2 or 3.. Nobody here gives a rats ass about hand wired pure toanz. Most of us are noise junkies who like to make our guitars or basses or toaster fitted with 3 contact mics and a drumstick sound like dying whales floating through the void. :drool: :!!!:
There is no right answer. There is no wrong answer... It's just straight up preference.
Attachments
thedude.jpg
thedude.jpg (38.46 KiB) Viewed 697 times
User avatar
Mudfuzz
HERO
HERO
Posts: 16705
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Mudfuzz »

So.. Are cassette tape or vinyl better than mp3s?
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

I'll put my Mesa up against anything and I've blown it up 4 times!
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by D.o.S. »

Better. Tone.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

Mudfuzz wrote:So.. Are cassette tape or vinyl better than mp3s?
Technically cassettes would be better than those but cd's are the gold standard as far as quality of actually keeping the true tone in tact.

See what I did there? I spoke out of my asshole. :)
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
weebles
experienced
experienced
Posts: 761
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 11:32 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by weebles »

True Bypass is the "semi-automatic" of the effects world.
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

D.o.S. wrote:Better. Tone.
You edit fast sir. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
Mudfuzz
HERO
HERO
Posts: 16705
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Mudfuzz »

Jesus Was a Robot wrote:
Mudfuzz wrote:So.. Are cassette tape or vinyl better than mp3s?
Technically cassettes would be better than those but)
but how many plays before before you have to buy a new fresh copy?
AlexGlassLungs
committed
committed
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:23 pm

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by AlexGlassLungs »

Ok so if there is no deference why did Keely make mods to the Line 6 Pedals? Why do brands like Diamond, Empress, and Chase Bliss make it so a digital path is blended into your analog path instead of just going straight into a digital circuit? You know why? Because going stight into a digital circuit and back out effects your analog signal... no one would go through the trouble of those designs if it didn’t
Post Reply