The controversial gear thread

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
Eivind August
HERO
HERO
Posts: 6259
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 12:23 pm
Location: Norway

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Eivind August »

AlexGlassLungs wrote:
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:I am almost positive you cannot ID a circuit as analog or digital by ear alone.
This is sig material because so many goddamn people swear they can and are full of shit.

If I were to plug a digital pedal into my rig I can 100% hear the difference in how the buffer alone effects my amp, on top of that the digital repeats and clarity of a delay for example sound too perfect, clear, and don’t have feel to them, an an analog delay has body and depth to it and has flaws that feel natural. It’s more to it than “I can hear this is digital”. There is a whole feel to the difference in the pedal.
In all seriousness, I too prefer analog delays for a similar, better worded reason. But that is a preference, and I hear people do rad shit with digital delays. It's two different sounds, that is all.

Also, what the duck is "wrong for gear"? Does that mean anything?
https://irerror.bandcamp.com/
friendship wrote:You motherfuckers think I won't fuck up a couple octoroks and assemble the Triforce?
Deals:
NSFW: show
succor, UncleBBQ, jerms, marco.desan, jwar, robapov, Tom Dalton, Gigahearts_FX, frigid midget, K2000, Tristan, untilshewokeme, backwardsvoyager, Strange Tales, brandsmannen, Ugly Casanova, goroth, Abanoise, Casavettes, multi_s, oldangelmidnight, Jero, Inconuucl, Dungus, christianatl, doralin, Wittgenstein, worra, D.o.S, rfurtkamp, blankfield, sillyfabe
User avatar
$harkToootth
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5861
Joined: Fri May 06, 2016 3:28 pm
Location: FACING IT!!!

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by $harkToootth »

We've talked about word salads before. What do you guys put on your word salad?

I donated blood last week. Am I digital?
"SWIPE LEFT ASSHOLE!" -retinal orbita
"Whatever ASSHOLE here’s my pedal that makes humpback whale noises and also it has a built in sequencer so stick it in your craw! -retinal orbita
"Patty Mullen takes me from a ball peen to a sledge" -The Great Velvet Hammer
"...at this exact moment Divine has learned of your jealous scheme from the local town gossip. She also has your address, ASS HOLE!" -Narrator (Mr. J) PINK FLAMINGOS
1 bird per post please
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by actual »

D.o.S. wrote:
actualidiot wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote:
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:I am almost positive you cannot ID a circuit as analog or digital by ear alone.
This is sig material because so many goddamn people swear they can and are full of shit.

If I were to plug a digital pedal into my rig I can 100% hear the difference in how the buffer alone effects my amp, on top of that the digital repeats and clarity of a delay for example sound too perfect, clear, and don’t have feel to them, an an analog delay has body and depth to it and has flaws that feel natural. It’s more to it than “I can hear this is digital”. There is a whole feel to the difference in the pedal.
Wanna be BFFs?
He's certainly making a strong case for your username.
What does D.o.S. stand for anyway?
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by actual »

inb4 disk operating system
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

AlexGlassLungs wrote:
2) Your analog/digital pedal mash-ups- Something I see a lot of is the flaunting of analog or analog signal path pedals. I for one am a huge fan of these types of pedals and quality builds. For slight background on me, I was a straight signal path kinda guitar player with no pedals for a long time and always wanted a great tone from my amp and still do. I’ve always been huge on my amps and Guitar pickups so adding pedals I needed ones that conserved my tone... so for me I won’t put digital pedals on my board. I play with hand wound pickups into anpoint to point I guitar head. I have pedals with PCB and obv you need to but none of them are digital, I don’t want my analog signal path being effected. I understand for a lot of you noise makers that this isn’t really an issue for you but my question isn’t really for you guys. My question is for the people spending a ton of money on their gear, who have spent thousands of dollars on your Guitar Amps pushing digital pedals into them. Why? Why would you put so much into your direct signal and distort it with digital effects? Again this isn’t me calling you out, it’s me simply asking your reasoning behind this. Also to add onto this, besides digital pedals I see a lot of “lesser quality brands” on pedalboards with really amazing pedals on them. Besides the function of what it’s doing, can you not hear the lesser quality of the product, say EHX for example... ok go!
This is literally the only one I can speak on because I don't play guitar, I play bass. :)

So, I have a bass that was around 6k new (I bought it used for 1700) and another bass that was around 5k new (bought it for 2300) a Mesa Bass Prodigy (it was 1500 new) and a pair of Mesa Powerhouse cabs (cannot remember the pricing but I got a killer deal).

That's a ton of money on gear. I also have a full board and even when I play without any effects, I don't notice much of a difference in the tone or degradation of the tone. At least not on my instruments. I feel like not all instruments are made equal. I will probably never be a non active bass player but I have noticed a much larger difference in passives versus actives. My pre-amp seems to be able to push the signal much better through all those buffers.

I'm obviously not a purist, but I can understand it to a certain extent. Modern digital processing is way better than it ever has been however, so I don't think this is a concern. In fact, there are now digital effects that have true or buffered bypass. So they are trying to appease the tone purist in that sense. Personally I think true bypass is stupid in most respects on pedals though. I prefer it to have a buffer to bring down the noise floor. I run my board with a mixture of digital and analog on purpose. I have zero feedback when I am not playing. When I use all analog pedals, there's always some kind of buzz or hum in the background. That shit drives me fucking crazy.

I guess, for me the question isn't why. It's why not? Sure I have a nice bass, and amp. I'm not ruining it's integrity by using other things to compliment it's natural built in tones. That's the way I look at it at least. You mileage may vary.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

Also, fellow ILF'ers. Note how I answered the question without being a dick? Or an asshole??? ;)
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
AlexGlassLungs
committed
committed
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:23 pm

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by AlexGlassLungs »

UglyCasanova wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote: See you posted your opinion on a Jaguar, I posted mine as well. You don’t like the feel of a Jaguar, I don’t like the feel of a machine wound pickup
Can you teach me telekinesis so can feel the inside of my pickups?

With all the digital gear you use you won’t be feeling much of anything :-/

Hahaha but no seriously, it’s almost equivalent to blasting a ton of compression vs no compression. Something you won’t experience if you done try it :idk:
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by D.o.S. »

Down on Stupid.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
UglyCasanova
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 12556
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:47 am
Location: Norway

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by UglyCasanova »

AlexGlassLungs wrote: If I were to plug a digital pedal into my rig I can 100% hear the difference in how the buffer alone effects my amp
This just means your amp isn't expensive enough.
User avatar
Strange Tales
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4499
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 7:14 pm
Location: America's Sorrow: New Jersey
Contact:

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Strange Tales »

D.o.S. wrote:Down on Stupid.
I'm a big fan of self-deprecation as well.
木枯らし // 木漏れ日 // 風に綱は戦ぐ

Strange Tales Distro - Japanese Underground Music Distribution in the US
Invisible Man wrote:Strange Tales: putting the ‘weeb’ in ‘dweeb’ since whenever.
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by D.o.S. »

Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Also, fellow ILF'ers. Note how I answered the question without being a dick? Or an asshole??? ;)
Precedent was set in the first post man.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

UglyCasanova wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote: If I were to plug a digital pedal into my rig I can 100% hear the difference in how the buffer alone effects my amp
This just means your amp isn't expensive enough.
I'd actually tend to agree with this in a way. Not on the money side but perhaps the quality side. A good amp won't change character that much when using a digital process versus an analog.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
actual
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:50 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by actual »

D.o.S. wrote:Down on Stupid.
I say Dicks or Steaks.
Mixing and mastering? Makeshift Audio
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by Jwar »

D.o.S. wrote:
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:Also, fellow ILF'ers. Note how I answered the question without being a dick? Or an asshole??? ;)
Precedent was set in the first post man.
Ever heard of killing them with kindness?

No?

Well, it was worth a shot. :(
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
AlexGlassLungs
committed
committed
Posts: 149
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:23 pm

Re: The controversial gear thread

Post by AlexGlassLungs »

UglyCasanova wrote:
AlexGlassLungs wrote: If I were to plug a digital pedal into my rig I can 100% hear the difference in how the buffer alone effects my amp
This just means your amp isn't expensive enough.
I can be passive aggressive too
Post Reply