veteransdaypoppy wrote:theavondon wrote:I used one once, and it seemed like there was volume drop, followed by volume increase, followed by drop at regular intervals.
just buy a fuzzbox!
THE GREAT DESTROYER=BOTH
EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
-
theavondon
- Supporter
- Posts: 10742
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
- Location: Denton, TX
Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?
THE GREAT DESTROYER=BOTH
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
NSFW: show
-
veteransdaypoppy
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2649
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:17 am
Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?
floating opera wrote:honestly. i think i lot of ppl just get off saying suchandsuchapedal either sucks tone or has a volume drop.
you read me like a book bro.
-
sevenSHARPnine
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2722
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:56 pm
- Location: Orange County, California
Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
http://www.youtube.com/sevensharpninehtsamurai wrote:sharpie is my hero and lover
-
echobaseone
- committed
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:46 am
Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?
I had one for a wee while. Kind of a fun toy in mono, but TOTAL EFFING AWESOME in stereo. As with quite a few of the newer EHX pedals, the truly usable portion is a narrow band...but again, in stereo there's a lot of cool variations. I currently run a Boss PN-2 and a Hummingbird, and you could get 95% of the way there with a Pulsar, I think.