Seymour Duncan Trem vs. Iron Ether Trem

[Communarchy]

http://www.seymourduncan.com/products/stompboxes/sfx07_shape_shi/

vs.
[url]
http://ironether.com/pedals/cygnet/[/url]

I know someone was talking about the Iron Ether line, and the Cygnet got me really excited. I told my friend about it and he pointed me to what he thought sounded very similar, that being the new SD trem. The price points are close (Cygnet 185, Shape Shifter 150-160) and from the description it seems that both really do the same sort of things. Any thoughts or am I missing anything?

[bdunlap]

I'm getting the iron ether. I would pick that over the shape shifter, because it has more wave options, a random wave, expression options for speed or doubling (both are extra cost for like $15), has a pulse width control, and looks snazzy. Perfect trem. The only thing that would make it even better is if it incorporated an opto trem but that's not really important. Iiiirrrooonnn eeeettthhheerrrrr

[Jero]

I'm getting the iron ether. I would pick that over the shape shifter, because it has more wave options, a random wave, expression options for speed or doubling (both are extra cost for like $15), has a pulse width control, and looks snazzy. Perfect trem. The only thing that would make it even better is if it incorporated an opto trem but that's not really important. Iiiirrrooonnn eeeettthhheerrrrr

This^