Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadcast?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- Snufkino
- experienced

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Yes, that's still the case, and it's a lot to fork out just for extra features. Having said that, it requires power and so seems pretty er... powerful. From what I've read (I can't get the main stonedeaf page to open for some reason) it can adjust tone, scooped filter, boosted filter or the freq control, but it looks like it just has one knob on it to set the low parameter of the actual sweep, and I can't see any exp mode toggle on the pdf2, so I'm not sure if you can jump from one parameter to another on the fly or if you're stuck with one choice and have to open it up to change it 
- D.o.S.
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 29881
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
- Location: Ewe-Kay
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
You can borrow my PDF-1 after I move to see if you like it?
- Harry_Manback
- experienced

- Posts: 624
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:23 pm
- Location: Staring straight at the sun.
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
The PDF-2 is so good it even makes my Elements sound better.


- amnesiac305
- experienced

- Posts: 502
- Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 8:19 pm
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
I have long been interested in the PDF-2 but for some reason the look of it really turns me off - aesthetics are usually the least of my concern
Excellent Transactions: monkeydancer, dorfmeister, Rygot, bronzetalon, PumpkinPieces, Wes Mantooth, Deltaphoenix, Blooghost, Fuzz_Pi, Neanderthal Head, lordgalvar
- Snufkino
- experienced

- Posts: 913
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Thanks, I'll give it some thought.D.o.S. wrote:You can borrow my PDF-1 after I move to see if you like it?
Oddly, I kind of feel the opposite. Usually I'm picky about aesthetics, and if it was any other brand, or type of enclosure I'd be put off, but for some reason I'm fine with these. Although if I went for the PDF2 I wonder if I could ask them to put an enclosure aside and just not have it screen printed?amnesiac305 wrote:I have long been interested in the PDF-2 but for some reason the look of it really turns me off - aesthetics are usually the least of my concern
- coldbrightsunlight
- Supporter

- Posts: 13666
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
You can borrow my PDF 1 any time if you want. Didn't even think to offer
but that would be no hassle.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
- coldbrightsunlight
- Supporter

- Posts: 13666
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Yeah totally. I can tell you right now you will love it because it IS QOTSA self titled
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
- coldbrightsunlight
- Supporter

- Posts: 13666
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Probably like £10-15?
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
- fcknoise
- IAMILFFAMOUS

- Posts: 4008
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:01 pm
- Location: Stockholm
- Contact:
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
For sure!!vidret wrote:Yeah so I've heard, and that's why I want to try it, but most dirt pedals don't make that cut when having to sound good going into my amps clean channel on low volumes.monkeydancer wrote:Yeah totally. I can tell you right now you will love it because it IS QOTSA self titled
Very few pedals so far do that, and for the dirt channel i've got black forest already.
How much is shipping? I'm gonna see if brands or goroth wants to split it with me to try it as well.
Cydonia wrote: Too bad no one here is interested in talking about "gear"
BossMann73 wrote:I didn't insult it......I "curated" a "different aesthetic.".
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/sharkmovieappriciatorJohn wrote:I love how this forum has the GDP of Switzerland in pedals but the collective value of everyone's patch cables is less than the change in my couch cushions. And I don't have a couch.
Bandcamp: https://fcknoise.bandcamp.com/
- Dark Barn
- FAMOUS

- Posts: 1801
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 5:12 am
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
I have no experience with the PDF :/ I do really like the Broadcast, snagged a 24v one used from a fellow bass player who was getting an even fancier two channel one made. I was hoping at the time to NOT like it, since I had no real room for it on my board. I just always had wanted to try it. But it turned out I liked it A LOT. That said the tone control is pretty much useless for us bass folks since it is a low cut, and the thing has a great tone wide open. It also sounds very good at all three gain toggle settings, I use it most at medium gain since i already love my Barbershop for low gain stuff.
- coldbrightsunlight
- Supporter

- Posts: 13666
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
- Location: UK
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Should do. Won't be able to post till next week but I'll let you know when I do.vidret wrote:cool. settled, send it
you've got my address since the microbrute right?
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
I make music sometimes:
https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/
https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/
https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
-
D Rock
- committed

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 12:25 am
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Pdf2 is awesome. I haven't tried the broadcast.
Just know the PDF 2 slays, tons of gain on tap and just the best dirt section I've ever had paired with SS/bs buZzz
Just know the PDF 2 slays, tons of gain on tap and just the best dirt section I've ever had paired with SS/bs buZzz
- Interstellar Burst
- involved

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:56 am
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Bumping an old thread here to ask - do people reckon that these do could be interesting/work well together?
I'm pretty wedded to my pdf-2 for it's ability to carve out space for different parts in a recording mix, but am getting that familiar feeling of gassy sexual attraction towards the Broadcast...
(The other dirt pedal in the mix would be a switchable superfuzz/companion fuzz clone, and I'm also gassing to compare the Buzzz with that)
I'm pretty wedded to my pdf-2 for it's ability to carve out space for different parts in a recording mix, but am getting that familiar feeling of gassy sexual attraction towards the Broadcast...
(The other dirt pedal in the mix would be a switchable superfuzz/companion fuzz clone, and I'm also gassing to compare the Buzzz with that)
- MechaGodzilla
- IAMILF

- Posts: 2447
- Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:19 am
Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc
Since this post, I now have a broadcast and it fucking kills. I use it last in the chain and it works like a cranked amp, warming up digital effects like the boss frv1 and it still cleans up like a fuzz face. It goes from clear and crisp to mushy and saggy in low gain mode, like the amp-on-full sounds on a Cream or Faces record. On high gain, you get the fat saggy crunch all the way up to ultra compressed synthy fuzz. And it seems to be friends with every other amp and effect you mix it with. I almost want another as a backup (or to stackMechaGodzilla wrote:I've only heard the broadcast in demos (didn't like) and live through a 100w marshall (liked very much). I'm uncertain how well it would work for me but I'd really like to have a go.
[I don't work for Hudson, I promise, I'm just a guy in love with a pedal