Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadcast?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
Snufkino
experienced
experienced
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am
Location: UK

Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadcast?

Post by Snufkino »

Stone Deaf PDF2
Hudson Effects Broadcast

Two different beasts, but I'm after something fuzzy but practical and these are the two have my attention. I had a compressor to even out the level of my strat pickups, but it felt like a compromise when using it in combination with distortion, fuzz or delay, or even (optical) tremolo. It just kind of killed the nuances that I love about each pedal enough to bug me. It excelled clean, and with reverb and flanger, but It wasn't really earning its keep.

So I'm after something that can even things out and/or tweak certain frequencies but with more flexibility, and be capable of sound filthy, because more filth never hurt. The Broadcast sounds like it has a Super Hard-On kind of thing going on, which I quite like. Evening/stiffening things out, but the Broadcast offers a little added flexibility and lovely sounding fuzz edges. The PDF2 on the other hands seems like it's more of a useful tone shaping tool that will work in conjunction with other pedals very well, as well as adding it's own nice sounding fuzziness.

I'm leaning more toward the PDF2 as it seems way more practical for me, but the Broadcast durt sounds soooo nice, and keeps things a little more simple.

Anyone using either of them? Any other suggestions? :group:
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by popvulture »

Can't testify to the Hudson as I haven't tried it, but I have a PDF-1 and it absolutely rules. My only gripe was that the fuzz wasn't switchable, but obviously now that's fixed. Super versatile pedal, can go subtle or really focused Q with the filtering, and the fuzz sounds really good. Also as you suspect, it indeed works great with other pedals.
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
User avatar
D.o.S.
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:47 am
Location: Ewe-Kay

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by D.o.S. »

Popvulture speaks the truth.

Plus it's basically the sound of the first QOTSA record in a box.
good deals are here.
flesh couch is here.
UglyCasanova wrote: It's not the expensive programs you use, it's the way you click and drag.
Achtane wrote:
comesect2.0 wrote:Michael Jackson king tut little Richard in your butt.
IT'S THE ENNNND OF THE WORRRLD AS WE KNOW IT
frigid midget
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 6:31 pm

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by frigid midget »

I didn't manage to get anything but 'subtle' tones out of my PDF-1 :idk:
The fuzz didn't nearly get gainy enough for me, and the filter didn't get cocked wah enough for me...Ymmv I guess :idk:

No experience with that Hudson pedlol. Don't want to turn this into a "try out this other pedal'" kind of thread if you're really set on getting eather one of those two...But I'm sorta on the lookout for a moog mf drive myself. Seems to have a little more gain than the PDF-1, and in a less scratchy fuzzy harsh kinda way.
User avatar
popvulture
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4563
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:09 am
Location: Austin

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by popvulture »

frigid midget wrote:I didn't manage to get anything but 'subtle' tones out of my PDF-1 :idk:
The fuzz didn't nearly get gainy enough for me, and the filter didn't get cocked wah enough for me...Ymmv I guess :idk:
Really? That's surprising. I don't have mine in front of me right this sec, but the detented thin / fat knob is basically Q, and whatever setting is the narrowest (I can't remember, but I'm gonna go with the obvious and guess "thin") yields some crazy filter sweeps with the freq knob in my experience. On the other end of the Q setting, the effect of the freq is indeed pretty subtle.
neonblack wrote:They say tone is in the hooks
D.o.S. wrote:I'm pretty sure moderation leads to Mustang Sally.
coldbrightsunlight wrote:Yes I am a soppy pop person at heart I think with noises round the edge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JphJfwsUbT4
User avatar
Snufkino
experienced
experienced
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am
Location: UK

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by Snufkino »

frigid midget wrote:But I'm sorta on the lookout for a moog mf drive myself. Seems to have a little more gain than the PDF-1, and in a less scratchy fuzzy harsh kinda way.

That was another I was considering, actually. I've owned it twice before for some stupid reason, but I just couldn't bond with it. It sounds great when the gain is pushed. Nice and full, but otherwise I wasn't using it. It also really benefits from an expression pedal, it's like you have a great wah pedal for not much money. Works really well clean and dirty, but again, I'm not going to use that. Maybe versatile for some, just not for me.
User avatar
fcknoise
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4008
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 4:01 pm
Location: Stockholm
Contact:

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by fcknoise »

This reminded me of the fact that I still want to try a pdf2
Cydonia wrote: Too bad no one here is interested in talking about "gear"
BossMann73 wrote:I didn't insult it......I "curated" a "different aesthetic.".
John wrote:I love how this forum has the GDP of Switzerland in pedals but the collective value of everyone's patch cables is less than the change in my couch cushions. And I don't have a couch.
Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/sharkmovieappriciator
Bandcamp: https://fcknoise.bandcamp.com/
User avatar
insubordination
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1608
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Syracuse, NY

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by insubordination »

If you're going to get a Broadcast, this is the one to get: http://www.peachguitars.com/fx-pedals/h ... 24v-fs.htm
NSFW: show
Image
I've had the original Broadcast as well as the 24v (single footswitch version) and they are amazing, really unique sounding pedals. I've owned more dirt pedals than I can remember and there is truly nothing like the Broadcast. Dunno if it's the transformer or germanium or both, but the way it breaks up is very saturated and awesome sounding (and compressor-like in that it doesn't really get louder when it saturates so much as it just gets...more...ish), but it does low gain really well, and sounds awesome into solid state and tube amps. It will definitely highlight the bright aspects of a guitar or amp, and it's picky about what gets stacked into it, but it sounds unilaterally awesome before virtually any dirt pedal (and great after delay/reverb).

I used it (the 9v version) as dirt on my band's record that we recorded in March (see signature, http://difficult.band, I'm the single guitar playing in the beginning of both tracks, right side) and still use the 24v version, but now as a post-delay lead boost type pedal, but also rhythm stuff with the volume rolled back and delay on (cool story bro). I fucking love it, and am considering the version I linked above. I've never used the PDF-2 but they seem like radically different pedals. I can't think of anything comparable to the Broadcast except the JHS Colour Box or Crayon (barf), and Fredric Accomplished Badger, which I've been meaning to check out: http://www.fredric.co.uk/accomplished-badger, but neither have transformers (except the Colour Box, but, fuck JHS).
Good deals on ILF: too many to list, just ask!

http://difficult.band
http://missingskull.bandcamp.com
User avatar
smallsnd/bigsnd
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3981
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:57 pm

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by smallsnd/bigsnd »

haven't tried the pdf yet but the broadcast is A+ awesome. i actually contacted michael at hudson about using a variation on it as a front end of the pretty years because they sounded so good together and although he wasn't keen on the idea he sent me some nice resources to check out and was incredibly chill overall. i have the switchable 24v version fyi. :thumb:
User avatar
MechaGodzilla
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2447
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:19 am

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by MechaGodzilla »

I've only heard the broadcast in demos (didn't like) and live through a 100w marshall (liked very much). I'm uncertain how well it would work for me but I'd really like to have a go.
User avatar
coldbrightsunlight
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13666
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:20 pm
Location: UK

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by coldbrightsunlight »

No experience with the Hudson, but it looks nice and demos sound good.

The pdf is brilliant though. Love mine and the gain switching on the 2 sorts out my only gripe with it. It can be very subtle or seriously in your face.

Plus this:
D.o.S. wrote:Plus it's basically the sound of the first QOTSA record in a box.
füzz lover. Friend. Quilter evangelist.

I make music sometimes:

https://nitrx.bandcamp.com/

https://mediocrisy.bandcamp.com/

https://fleshcouch.bandcamp.com
User avatar
nshuman
experienced
experienced
Posts: 600
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by nshuman »

The broadcast is cool, not sure I'd qualify it as a fuzz though. I had the original first run with the rare transistor in it, it was cool. I flipped it and now I have a dual gain 24v one. You can definitely get more dirt at 9v, but 24v is the more flexible sound IMHO. The dual gain option (custom option) might be a good option for you if you are looking for flexibility. It adds a second footswitch and second volume pot.

The pots become Low cut, Gain Trim, Level A, Level B. You choose one gain setting but you have an output pot for both settings, selected by the second footswitch.

Then, the 3 way gain switch (3 way in the 24v version low/medium/high, 2 way in the original 9v-24v version low/high) becomes a selector between low-high/low-medium/medium-high. This allows you to use a different switch setting on A and B. Makes it real useful as a low gain od and high gain dirt pedal. They have a custom run going with two footswitches but without the 3 way switch, that's a bit less flexible.
User avatar
Snufkino
experienced
experienced
Posts: 913
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am
Location: UK

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by Snufkino »

I remember reading that the 9v would likely be more fuzzy, so I was thinking that version rather than the newer ones initially, but the 24v makes more sense. Didn't realise there were two dual-footswitch versions.

My hear wants the Broadcast, my brain wants the PDF
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by Chankgeez »

Get both! :!!!:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
Howsyrface
involved
involved
Posts: 56
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:18 am

Re: Durt conundrum. Stone Deaf PDF, or Hudson Effects Broadc

Post by Howsyrface »

Can you still only use Stone Deaf's own expression pedal with the PDF2 (and their other dirt, i guess)? That's pretty lame if that's the case.
Post Reply