I'll chime in cause I'm familiar with the dmm and DM-3. The latter is just awesome in it's simplicity. Totally a personal thing, but the color and grit of the repeats are the shit imo. Dark and murky, but not TOO washy or fucked up, unlike a lot of other bbd delays. The beauty of the dmm lies in the warble, and the warmth you get even when the repeats are barely audible.Christophe wrote:Shit. ILF stopped emailing me about new posts on this thread. So I've missed a few posts... Well I've never owned a dm2 or a DMM, the most revered delays ever. (by the way a friend of mine showed me the Berhinger version, "vintage time machine", and it sounds fat!). I'm sure I would dig these... I kind of avoid the question of buying a DMM this way: it sounds great but it has left its print already. Why reproduce this sound forever? We need to make today's music, right?rustywire wrote:DMM. You want a DMMChristophe wrote:... (it's hard to describe a sound, but, you know, when delay sounds more like music lying around what you're playing, rather than just repeats? and they all seem capable of great experimental/crazy sounds)...
I mean, that's another question about delay: dm2s and DMMs, are they just good, period, (regardless of music genres etc...), or are we just so hooked on nostalgia that we have a hard time moving on to something else? I'm pretty sure that in a 30-year time, people will consider the Boss space echo (even if it's a remake) like the best thing that ever happened to delay in a stomp box.
That being said, the search is endless, I might fall back on a DMM in the future...
There's way to many awesome newer delays based on those too though. No point in dwelling over vintage stuff (or reissues for that matter) when there's a of improved clones...Right?



