EQD Transmisser reverb

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

odontophobia
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 5556
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: grand rapids

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by odontophobia »

This looks pretty great. I really enjoy the Afterneath. This is definitely another flavor of Afterneath. It's definitely going to make it's way onto my want list. I want to use this with my Dreadbox and hook up my expression pedal and just go nuts on this thing.
User avatar
Ev_O)))
experienced
experienced
Posts: 958
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2014 7:53 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Ev_O))) »

perfect verb to pair with my incoming pretty years? probably.
I make noise, droney music: http://blasariusyonder.com
Joel Korte wrote: It's always your fucking fault
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42255
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Chankgeez »

Can someone, please, do a cover of this somehow incorporating the Transmisser?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_zLxPNUIqw[/youtube]
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
coupleonapkins
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2882
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by coupleonapkins »

rustywire wrote:If only there were a toggle switch to enable EXP control of the Warp knob... :eek:
I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me. The Transmisser looks fabulous, but I'm not totally on fire about how it sounds...yet :idk:
Somehow makes me want a LAL Sandstorm instead - maybe my ears are just fatigued today :(
Chankgeez wrote:Can someone, please, do a cover of this somehow incorporating the Transmisser?
I was always partial to this version (Transmisser free in 1993, erm, 1996?):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTHFujLor6o[/youtube]
Good morning!
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Inconuucl »

Ev_O))) wrote:perfect verb to pair with my incoming pretty years? probably.
I'm not so sure. The pretty years and this can be dangerous to your amp in some settings and the py can kill the Transmisser's filter on others. :idk:
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Jwar »

i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
moogboy
committed
committed
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:27 pm
Location: Detroit, Michigan

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by moogboy »

I played this pedal about a month and a half ago because [REDACTED] and from that first moment I knew I needed it. Cannot fucking wait to get my hands on one or three
I play guitar and modular synthesizer in Juggable Offense.
juggableoffense.bandcamp.com
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Inconuucl »

jwar wrote:i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.
It's a matter of stacking resonant bands together more than volume. :idk:
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
User avatar
cherler
experienced
experienced
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:48 pm
Location: Dirtona

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by cherler »

coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.
You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.
Instagram yo

Good dealin's: D.o.S.
User avatar
coupleonapkins
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2882
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 4:09 pm

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by coupleonapkins »

cherler wrote:
coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.
You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.
Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one :facepalm:), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking :idk:). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........:cool:
Good morning!
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Inconuucl »

;;cry
coupleonapkins wrote:
cherler wrote:
coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.
You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.
Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one :facepalm:), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking :idk:). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........:cool:
EQD def outgrew ILF. :lol: :cry:

I'm almost sure that the EQD guys said they didn't want to add EXP in because it only sounds good with subtle changes or something like that. :idk:
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
User avatar
repoman
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2291
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:16 pm
Location: Edge City

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by repoman »

Very Cool
F U T U R E G A M E R
User avatar
Jwar
Cosmic of BILF
Cosmic of BILF
Posts: 18239
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:18 pm
Location: The edge of existence

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Jwar »

Inconuucl wrote:
jwar wrote:i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.
It's a matter of stacking resonant bands together more than volume. :idk:
True. I still think it'd be ok, but only one way to tell. lol
"I do not have the ability to think rationally 90% of the time and I also change my mind at the drop of a hat".

-JWAR :)
User avatar
Inconuucl
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6407
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:35 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: EQD Transmisser reverb

Post by Inconuucl »

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAaahTe4vjc[/youtube]
Le Ciel Inconnu (I was a whale once.)
Image
NSFW: show
Chankgeez wrote: We should have a game show à la Name That Tune

Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 5 pedals.
other contestant: I can shoegaze that tune with 4 pedals.
Inconuucl: I can shoegaze that tune with 3 pedals.
other contestant: OK, shoegaze that tune!
Inconuucl: :!!!:
Post Reply