Dear gear manufacturers,

rustywire · Post by **rustywire** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:33 pm

Your reissues can exist and be desirable without calling them *vintage such and such*
You make me want to not buy whatever you're selling due to false positives in search results.
When I want vintage I buy vintage. When I want RIs I buy RIs. Buzzwords are for poseurs.
Stop it.

-a fan of fun sound stuff both new and old

D.o.S. · Post by **D.o.S.** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:34 pm

And also put a Death Metal in it. For Jesus.

rustywire · Post by **rustywire** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 5:39 pm

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:15 pm

Can I have an extensive list of examples please?

crochambeau · Post by **crochambeau** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:19 pm

I have better luck plugging "old piece of shit" or "broken" into my search terms when sniffing around for the classics.

cloudscapes · Post by **cloudscapes** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 6:37 pm

can't wait for DSP to be considered 'vintage' when future effects are all quantum entangled or some shit

tremolo3 · Post by **tremolo3** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 7:11 pm

I'll be the first to buy a pedal that adds a digital dust quality to my signal.

rfurtkamp · Post by **rfurtkamp** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:23 pm

ramonovski wrote:I'll be the first to buy a pedal that adds a digital dust quality to my signal.

Just get one of those pedals from the people who brought modulation back.

They did a throwback 80s delay, didn't they?

Jwar · Post by **Jwar** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:29 pm

Bro they didn't bring it back. They re-popularized it or some shit. hahaha

I love vintage tone. If you say it with everything, it may trick me into thinking it's vintage, which equal mojo. Mojo equals a better player I assume. I can use all the mojo I can get.

rfurtkamp · Post by **rfurtkamp** » Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:46 pm

Repopularized it, bring it back...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWdVwt2deY4[/youtube]

rustywire · Post by **rustywire** » Fri Jul 15, 2016 12:27 am

Underrated scene. Jay's goodbye horses Buffalo Bill dance is also hilar if not a bit cringy.
However that seemingly random, large-scale choreographed dance number is one of the biggest cringes ever put to film.
I like the direction this thread has taken.

But to callback the pitchman goofiness:

cloudscapes wrote:can't wait for DSP to be considered 'vintage' when future effects are all quantum entangled or some shit

Yup. It's coming. "VINTAGE POD HD### ALL ORIGINAL HOLY GRAIL 2004 BEST YEAR!!!!!"

rfurtkamp · Post by **rfurtkamp** » Fri Jul 15, 2016 12:35 am

rustywire wrote:
cloudscapes wrote:can't wait for DSP to be considered 'vintage' when future effects are all quantum entangled or some shit
Yup. It's coming. "VINTAGE POD HD### ALL ORIGINAL HOLY GRAIL 2004 BEST YEAR!!!!!"

Worse.

From Guitar World, 2029,

"New guitar hero, Neon Pantyhose, swears by his first generation Line6 Spider amps. He plays eight of them live, plus floorboards.

And a Fender Cyber-twin.

He sounds amazing, twirling the double-necked djent seven string Vai custom Ibanez like a mad Barbie."

rustywire · Post by **rustywire** » Fri Jul 15, 2016 1:10 am

Everything about that scenario sounds alarmingly plausible

01010111 · Post by **01010111** » Fri Jul 15, 2016 3:05 am

You know... I'd totally rock a cyber twin if you could program patches like with the organelle, and it was capable of running like five of them at the same time with an effects loop that could be placed anywhere in that signal chain....

I still think they look cool, and I really liked that the knobs actually turned to the preset values.

rfurtkamp · Post by **rfurtkamp** » Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:44 am

Yea, well, you'd have to get five of them and then hack them up to put in that FX loop.

I like the motorized knob thing - that and the led knobs of the Behringer and Roland stuff that accomlish effectively the same thing.

I'd love one too but I have its spiritual descendant that sounds better in the Mustang V.

ilovefuzz.com

Dear gear manufacturers,

Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,

Re: Dear gear manufacturers,