RAWR (Blur content)

Your band, other bands, singers, songwriters, more.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
Blurillaz
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4592
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: A level you spend too long in

RAWR (Blur content)

Post by Blurillaz »

Last edited by Blurillaz on Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
we
User avatar
veteransdaypoppy
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:17 am

Re: RAWR

Post by veteransdaypoppy »

:joy:
well i guess, but i just don't know.

dollys
User avatar
Blurillaz
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4592
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 6:31 pm
Location: A level you spend too long in

Re: RAWR

Post by Blurillaz »

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--Yf5gd8iTo[/youtube]
we
User avatar
Spiteface
committed
committed
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:49 am

Re: RAWR (Blur content)

Post by Spiteface »

I like that. Might actually be the most british-sounding thing Damon Albarn's done in years.

Here's to hoping the reformation of Blur is something more permanent.
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff.
User avatar
FuzzHugger
Admin
Admin
Posts: 6116
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: RAWR (Blur content)

Post by FuzzHugger »

Can't lie, I love me some Blur. I've always thought they could/should be bigger than they are, though that seems like their own choice.
User avatar
tuffteef
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7890
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 7:05 pm
Location: Downunderverse

Re: RAWR (Blur content)

Post by tuffteef »

love blur :)*
stanimal
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1271
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:40 am

Re: RAWR (Blur content)

Post by stanimal »

yes, think Blur didn't want to be Blur when the comparisons with Oasis et al started to be too much perhaps.... maybe now that Oasis has imploded we can get more Blur and WAY less new Gorillaz....
blooghost wrote: I am here because Heaven is for fucking squares and Hell has no fuzz :animal:
Officer Bukowski wrote:Sorry like half of the people I know are fictional tv characters.
devi ever wrote:Seriously... nothing but ultimate holy fuzz love for you guys. :love: :hug:
User avatar
FuzzHugger
Admin
Admin
Posts: 6116
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:05 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: RAWR (Blur content)

Post by FuzzHugger »

stanimal wrote:yes, think Blur didn't want to be Blur when the comparisons with Oasis et al started to be too much perhaps.... maybe now that Oasis has imploded we can get more Blur and WAY less new Gorillaz....


I think you're right about them not wanting to be considered a less-popular-than-Oasis brit-pop band. I remember reading a quote from Damon (around the time of Think Tank) where he said he could write huge pop hits all day / easily make an album of singles...but that he didn't want to. Normally, I'd call bullshit on an artist that said that, but I think he was probably telling the truth. :)

Haha...I don't mind Gorillaz, but I've never really gotten into them (I usually like my rock/pop/singing and hip hop to be kept separate).

Speaking of Oasis, I went to see them in the early 2000s with a couple of friends (none of us were fans). Travis opened for them...this was probably 3-6 months before they semi-blew-up here. Travis absolutely killed, put on a show and played wayyy heavier than they do on record. Oasis was incredibly boring, just stood there and played...AND they heckled the crowd to top it off! :lol: :facepalm:
Post Reply